(Moved from QQ space)
I recently read "The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People" (Chinese version, haven't read the original).
for success.
I have always been skeptical of success.
What is success? Success in what way? Why be successful?
The meaning of human existence has
not yet been understood, and you are thinking of success?
Like the ubiquitous talent show, I think the proliferation of success studies is the product of impetuousness.
Everyone has their own aspirations, and the true state of success is different for everyone.
Success is "destined", it is a natural result after things develop, and it comes naturally.
Any "success" that requires a lot of deliberate effort is not true success.
As "Any 'Xiaoyao' that needs the help of external force is not a real Xiaoyao" ("Xiaoyaoyou").
The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People
I will not say why I read this book. I also read superficially (lots of narrative).
Many people rated this book highly. The book sold very well.
1. Say the negative first.
1.1 It is about successful learning.
Success is all about utilitarianism. Referring to the previous "doubt" about the study of success, a solid negative tone has been laid.
1.2 Successful students often regard some theories or arguments that cannot withstand strict scrutiny as "axioms", and use this to expand and
prove some of their theories.
This book is no exception.
I think this is very important. Because this is already biased towards the rhythm of
brainwashing . If you can't recognize this, and you don't have your own opinions, the more you read, the more stupid you will be. 1.3 After reading the whole book, it feels like reading a composition with full marks in the college entrance examination.
(Yes, you read that right, I attribute this point to negation .) Various famous quotes in the book, various examples of evidence, the arrangement of arguments and arguments... It is almost the same as writing an argumentative essay for the college entrance examination.
Celebrity quotes are extremely pale arguments in argumentative essays, and are only minus points in my grading scale . The reason is the same as "the princes and generals have a kindness" (others can say it, why can't I say it? Why is what others say is right, and what I say is wrong?).
Case study? Is there any scientific evidence? Are there stats? How was the sample taken? Besides, statistics are also outrageous, and may not reflect the essence of things at all.
I think this is very important. Because this is already biased towards the rhythm of
brainwashing . If you can't recognize this, and you don't have your own opinions, the more you read, the more stupid you will be. 1.3 After reading the whole book, it feels like reading a composition with full marks in the college entrance examination.
(Yes, you read that right, I attribute this point to negation .) Various famous quotes in the book, various examples of evidence, the arrangement of arguments and arguments... It is almost the same as writing an argumentative essay for the college entrance examination.
Celebrity quotes are extremely pale arguments in argumentative essays, and are only minus points in my grading scale . The reason is the same as "the princes and generals have a kindness" (others can say it, why can't I say it? Why is what others say is right, and what I say is wrong?).
Case study? Is there any scientific evidence? Are there stats? How was the sample taken? Besides, statistics are also outrageous, and may not reflect the essence of things at all.
2. The book also contains some correct or more useful points.
2.1 The inner essence is more persuasive than the outer words and deeds.
If the surface is not the same, no matter how good the surface is, it will not be able to convince people.
2.2 Seek yourself instead, from the inside out.
After the pursuit of quick special effects has created many problems, we will understand that some fundamental problems cannot be
solved in a superficial way.
Finding happiness, success, or problem-solving from outside sources often doesn't stand the test of time.
2.3 Output and capacity must be balanced to achieve true high performance.
Output is the task completed, and capacity is the ability to complete the task. Similar to "If a worker wants to do good things, he must first sharpen his tools"
, and the purpose of "sharp weapons" is "good things". Both "sharp weapons" and "good deeds" must be grasped.
2.4 Treat employees how you want employees to treat customers.
2.5 Only by participation can there be recognition.
提高员工福利，让他们参与实实在在的分红，自然干劲十足。
如果员工还在为生计工作，那公司在对外的公益慈善方面肯定得不到员工真心实意的付出。
再者，作为盈利公司，就不要去做公益慈善。做什么都是伪善。就像黑商拜佛。
关于公司出钱为员工搞一些俱乐部、兴趣培训课程等。肯定得建立在员工生活优越的
基础上。同时，如果不能保证每位员工都能获得优质的体验就索性不要搞。还不如折现
平分。
2.6 与其着重于时间
与事物的安排，不如把重心放在维持产出与产能的平衡上。
2.7 管理是有效地把事情做好，领导则是确定所做的事是否正确。
2.8 勇于说不。
人各有志，各有优先要务。必要时，应该不卑不亢地拒绝别人，在急迫与重要之间，
知道取舍。
2.9 对事将效率，对人讲效用——即某一行为是否有效。
2.10 高效能合作的秘诀是授权。充分信任型的授权，才是有效的管理之道。
2.11 合作前要阐明期望。（丑话说前头）
2.12 合作要尊重差异
2.13 如果想要合作，就不要突出个人或单位的业绩。
要合作，奖励机制就得符合合作的要求。对个人或单位的奖励会导致内部竞争，互相
拆台，当然不利于合作。要合作，就得设立合作的目标，奖励机制也已此为依据，奖
励覆盖面要光，参与的都有奖，不能突出个人或单位。
其实大道理就那么几个，其它道理都是从这些大道理衍生出来的（“道法自然”）
。人之所以会对非常多的道理产生或相见恨晚，或耳目一新，或不明觉厉等感觉，是
因为他们没有去做过从大道理到各种细道理的推论，或根本没能力去推论。
最后。
世人往往被表面现象所蒙蔽。
世人多只重结果，却忽略了分析过程的重要性。
(I said the importance of " analyzing the process " to emphasize the importance of analyzing the essence of things. I am by no means a
"hypocrite, true loser" who "enjoys the process" and "appreciates the scenery along the way".)
Winners succeed because they succeed.
If you are successful, what you say is right, and anything can be the reason for success. Farts are delicious.
If you fail, no matter how well you do, you will be a loser. Anything can be the cause of failure.
Everything has two sides. To describe the same thing, either positive or negative words can be used.
Everything has two sides. To describe the same thing, either positive or negative words can be used.