Pytorch实现MNIST（附SGD、Adam、AdaBound不同优化器下的训练比较） adabound实现

学习工具最快的方法就是在使用的过程中学习，也就是在工作中（解决实际问题中）学习。文章结尾处附完整代码。

一、数据准备
在Pytorch中提供了MNIST的数据，因此我们只需要使用Pytorch提供的数据即可。

from torchvision import datasets, transforms
# batch_size 是指每次送入网络进行训练的数据量
batch_size = 64
# MNIST Dataset
# MNIST数据集已经集成在pytorch datasets中，可以直接调用
train_dataset = datasets.MNIST(root='./data/',
train=True,
transform=transforms.ToTensor(),
download=True)

test_dataset = datasets.MNIST(root='./data/',
train=False,
transform=transforms.ToTensor())

train_loader = torch.utils.data.DataLoader(dataset=train_dataset,
batch_size=batch_size,
shuffle=True)

test_loader = torch.utils.data.DataLoader(dataset=test_dataset,
batch_size=batch_size,
shuffle=False)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
二、建立网络
class Net(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super(Net, self).__init__()
# 输入1通道，输出10通道，kernel 5*5
self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(in_channels=1, out_channels=10, kernel_size=5)
# 输入10通道，输出20通道，kernel 5*5
self.conv2 = nn.Conv2d(10, 20, 5)
# 输入20通道，输出40通道，kernel 3*3
self.conv3 = nn.Conv2d(20, 40, 3)
# 2*2的池化层
self.mp = nn.MaxPool2d(2)
# 全连接层(输入特征数，输出)
self.fc = nn.Linear(40, 10)

def forward(self, x):
# in_size = 64
# one batch 此时的x是包含batchsize维度为4的tensor，即(batchsize，channels，x，y)
# x.size(0)指batchsize的值，把batchsize的值作为网络的in_size
in_size = x.size(0)
# x: 64*1*28*28
x = F.relu(self.mp(self.conv1(x)))
# x: 64*10*12*12 (n+2p-f)/s + 1 = 28 - 5 + 1 = 24,所以在没有池化的时候是24*24,池化层为2*2 ，所以池化之后为12*12
x = F.relu(self.mp(self.conv2(x)))
# x: 64*20*4*4 同理，没有池化的时候是12 - 5 + 1 = 8 ，池化后为4*4
x = F.relu(self.mp(self.conv3(x)))
# 输出x : 64*40*2*2

x = x.view(in_size, -1) # 平铺 tensor 相当于resharp
# print(x.size())
# x: 64*320
x = self.fc(x)
# x: 64*10
# print(x.size())
return F.log_softmax(x) #64*10

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
三、开始训练
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F
import torch.optim as optim

model = Net()
optimizer = optim.SGD(model.parameters(), lr=0.01, momentum=0.5)

def train(epoch):
# enumerate()枚举、列举，对于一个可迭代/遍历的对象，enumerate将其组成一个索引序列，利用它可以同时获得索引和值
for batch_idx, (data, target) in enumerate(train_loader): #batch_idx是enumerate（）函数自带的索引，从0开始
# data.size():[64, 1, 28, 28]
# target.size():[64]
output = model(data)
# output:64*10
loss = F.nll_loss(output, target)
# 每200次，输出一次数据
if batch_idx % 200 == 0:
print('Train Epoch: {} [{}/{} ({:.0f}%)]\tLoss: {:.6f}'.
format(
epoch,
batch_idx * len(data),
len(train_loader.dataset),
100. * batch_idx / len(train_loader),
loss.item()))

optimizer.zero_grad() # 所有参数的梯度清零
loss.backward() # 即反向传播求梯度
optimizer.step() # 调用optimizer进行梯度下降更新参数

# 实验入口
for epoch in range(1, 10):
train(epoch)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
对于训练中的一些参数解释如下：

batch_idx：batch的索引，即batch的数量。
batch_size：每次送入网络的数据量
四、测试模型

def test():
test_loss = 0
correct = 0
for data, target in test_loader:
data, target = Variable(data, volatile=True), Variable(target)
output = model(data.cuda())
# 累加loss
test_loss += F.nll_loss(output, target.cuda(), size_average=False).item()
# get the index of the max log-probability
# 找出每列（索引）概率意义下的最大值
pred = output.data.max(1, keepdim=True)[1]
# print(pred)
correct += pred.eq(target.data.view_as(pred).cuda()).cuda().sum()

test_loss /= len(test_loader.dataset)
print('\nTest set: Average loss: {:.4f}, Accuracy: {}/{} ({:.0f}%)\n'.format(
test_loss, correct, len(test_loader.dataset),
100. * correct / len(test_loader.dataset)))

# 实验入口
for epoch in range(1, 10):
print("test num"+str(epoch))
train(epoch)
test()
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
在此展示结果的最后一次：

可以看到，我们使用SGD作为优化器的优化函数时，测试集后来达到的正确率为92%

五、提高测试集正确率
5.1 增加训练次数（SGD版）
如题，我们将训练次数增至30，优化函数仍然使用SGD，即只在入口循环处改变epoch的取值范围。为了节省空间，结果只输出测试集loss和正确率。
我们可以看到，在num18时，测试集的正确率收敛，达到了96%；loss也是在0.1附近波动。

Test set: Average loss: 2.2955, Accuracy: 1018/10000 (10%)

test num1

Test set: Average loss: 2.2812, Accuracy: 2697/10000 (26%)

test num2

Test set: Average loss: 2.2206, Accuracy: 3862/10000 (38%)

test num3

Test set: Average loss: 1.8014, Accuracy: 6100/10000 (61%)

test num4

Test set: Average loss: 0.7187, Accuracy: 8049/10000 (80%)

test num5

Test set: Average loss: 0.4679, Accuracy: 8593/10000 (85%)

test num6

Test set: Average loss: 0.3685, Accuracy: 8898/10000 (88%)

test num7

Test set: Average loss: 0.3006, Accuracy: 9108/10000 (91%)

test num8

Test set: Average loss: 0.2713, Accuracy: 9177/10000 (91%)

test num9

Test set: Average loss: 0.2343, Accuracy: 9270/10000 (92%)

test num10

Test set: Average loss: 0.2071, Accuracy: 9370/10000 (93%)

test num11

Test set: Average loss: 0.1910, Accuracy: 9413/10000 (94%)

test num12

Test set: Average loss: 0.1783, Accuracy: 9453/10000 (94%)

test num13

Test set: Average loss: 0.1612, Accuracy: 9482/10000 (94%)

test num14

Test set: Average loss: 0.1603, Accuracy: 9497/10000 (94%)

test num15

Test set: Average loss: 0.1522, Accuracy: 9526/10000 (95%)

test num16

Test set: Average loss: 0.1410, Accuracy: 9555/10000 (95%)

test num17

Test set: Average loss: 0.1338, Accuracy: 9573/10000 (95%)

test num18

Test set: Average loss: 0.1307, Accuracy: 9588/10000 (95%)

test num19

Test set: Average loss: 0.1212, Accuracy: 9610/10000 (96%)

test num20

Test set: Average loss: 0.1232, Accuracy: 9622/10000 (96%)

test num21

Test set: Average loss: 0.1149, Accuracy: 9646/10000 (96%)

test num22

Test set: Average loss: 0.1104, Accuracy: 9652/10000 (96%)

test num23

Test set: Average loss: 0.1072, Accuracy: 9668/10000 (96%)

test num24

Test set: Average loss: 0.1113, Accuracy: 9646/10000 (96%)

test num25

Test set: Average loss: 0.1037, Accuracy: 9659/10000 (96%)

test num26

Test set: Average loss: 0.0970, Accuracy: 9700/10000 (97%)

test num27

Test set: Average loss: 0.1013, Accuracy: 9692/10000 (96%)

test num28

Test set: Average loss: 0.1015, Accuracy: 9675/10000 (96%)

test num29

Test set: Average loss: 0.0952, Accuracy: 9711/10000 (97%)

test num30

Test set: Average loss: 0.0885, Accuracy: 9727/10000 (97%)

Process finished with exit code 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
5.2 Adam版（训练次数：30）
Adam还是名副其实的老大，第一次就已经达到了SGD收敛时候的loss值和正确率。我们可以看到，在num26时，Adam优化函数下的模型对于测试集的预测正确率达到了99%，loss为0.0397，但是正确率似乎并没有收敛到99%。

test num1

Test set: Average loss: 0.1108, Accuracy: 9660/10000 (96%)

test num2

Test set: Average loss: 0.0932, Accuracy: 9709/10000 (97%)

test num3

Test set: Average loss: 0.0628, Accuracy: 9800/10000 (98%)

test num4

Test set: Average loss: 0.0562, Accuracy: 9813/10000 (98%)

test num5

Test set: Average loss: 0.0478, Accuracy: 9832/10000 (98%)

test num6

Test set: Average loss: 0.0442, Accuracy: 9850/10000 (98%)

test num7

Test set: Average loss: 0.0386, Accuracy: 9863/10000 (98%)

test num8

Test set: Average loss: 0.0768, Accuracy: 9753/10000 (97%)

test num9

Test set: Average loss: 0.0343, Accuracy: 9879/10000 (98%)

test num10

Test set: Average loss: 0.0347, Accuracy: 9877/10000 (98%)

test num11

Test set: Average loss: 0.0494, Accuracy: 9825/10000 (98%)

test num12

Test set: Average loss: 0.0571, Accuracy: 9811/10000 (98%)

test num13

Test set: Average loss: 0.0342, Accuracy: 9887/10000 (98%)

test num14

Test set: Average loss: 0.0400, Accuracy: 9870/10000 (98%)

test num15

Test set: Average loss: 0.0339, Accuracy: 9889/10000 (98%)

test num16

Test set: Average loss: 0.0371, Accuracy: 9889/10000 (98%)

test num17

Test set: Average loss: 0.0402, Accuracy: 9872/10000 (98%)

test num18

Test set: Average loss: 0.0434, Accuracy: 9887/10000 (98%)

test num19

Test set: Average loss: 0.0377, Accuracy: 9877/10000 (98%)

test num20

Test set: Average loss: 0.0402, Accuracy: 9883/10000 (98%)

test num21

Test set: Average loss: 0.0407, Accuracy: 9886/10000 (98%)

test num22

Test set: Average loss: 0.0482, Accuracy: 9871/10000 (98%)

test num23

Test set: Average loss: 0.0414, Accuracy: 9891/10000 (98%)

test num24

Test set: Average loss: 0.0407, Accuracy: 9890/10000 (98%)

test num25

Test set: Average loss: 0.0403, Accuracy: 9898/10000 (98%)

test num26

Test set: Average loss: 0.0397, Accuracy: 9902/10000 (99%)

test num27

Test set: Average loss: 0.0491, Accuracy: 9873/10000 (98%)

test num28

Test set: Average loss: 0.0416, Accuracy: 9896/10000 (98%)

test num29

Test set: Average loss: 0.0450, Accuracy: 9897/10000 (98%)

test num30

Test set: Average loss: 0.0500, Accuracy: 9875/10000 (98%)

Process finished with exit code 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
5.3 AdaBound版（训练次数：30）
AdaBound即最近北大、浙大本科生新提出的训练速度比肩Adam，性能媲美SGD的优化算法。
可以看到，在num4、num5时就正确率已经达到了98%，loss已经比Adam收敛时候的loss低。而在num8的时候，正确率突破99%！loss达到了0.0303！，在接下来的几次训练中，正确率和loss有细微的波动，但是随着训练次数的增加，正确率和loss还是达到了最佳的收敛值，波动并不是特别大。

test num1

Test set: Average loss: 0.1239, Accuracy: 9614/10000 (96%)

test num2

Test set: Average loss: 0.0965, Accuracy: 9704/10000 (97%)

test num3

Test set: Average loss: 0.0637, Accuracy: 9794/10000 (97%)

test num4

Test set: Average loss: 0.0485, Accuracy: 9852/10000 (98%)

test num5

Test set: Average loss: 0.0403, Accuracy: 9870/10000 (98%)

test num6

Test set: Average loss: 0.0513, Accuracy: 9836/10000 (98%)

test num7

Test set: Average loss: 0.0446, Accuracy: 9856/10000 (98%)

test num8

Test set: Average loss: 0.0303, Accuracy: 9910/10000 (99%)

test num9

Test set: Average loss: 0.0411, Accuracy: 9873/10000 (98%)

test num10

Test set: Average loss: 0.0422, Accuracy: 9870/10000 (98%)

test num11

Test set: Average loss: 0.0319, Accuracy: 9894/10000 (98%)

test num12

Test set: Average loss: 0.0303, Accuracy: 9905/10000 (99%)

test num13

Test set: Average loss: 0.0338, Accuracy: 9897/10000 (98%)

test num14

Test set: Average loss: 0.0313, Accuracy: 9904/10000 (99%)

test num15

Test set: Average loss: 0.0285, Accuracy: 9920/10000 (99%)

test num16

Test set: Average loss: 0.0319, Accuracy: 9917/10000 (99%)

test num17

Test set: Average loss: 0.0427, Accuracy: 9884/10000 (98%)

test num18

Test set: Average loss: 0.0351, Accuracy: 9894/10000 (98%)

test num19

Test set: Average loss: 0.0337, Accuracy: 9897/10000 (98%)

test num20

Test set: Average loss: 0.0321, Accuracy: 9910/10000 (99%)

test num21

Test set: Average loss: 0.0354, Accuracy: 9908/10000 (99%)

test num22

Test set: Average loss: 0.0332, Accuracy: 9905/10000 (99%)

test num23

Test set: Average loss: 0.0347, Accuracy: 9904/10000 (99%)

test num24

Test set: Average loss: 0.0362, Accuracy: 9906/10000 (99%)

test num25

Test set: Average loss: 0.0402, Accuracy: 9900/10000 (99%)

test num26

Test set: Average loss: 0.0380, Accuracy: 9900/10000 (99%)

test num27

Test set: Average loss: 0.0378, Accuracy: 9914/10000 (99%)

test num28

Test set: Average loss: 0.0356, Accuracy: 9913/10000 (99%)

test num29

Test set: Average loss: 0.0360, Accuracy: 9912/10000 (99%)

# Training settings
batch_size = 64

# TODO dataset 和 dataloader
# MNIST Dataset
# MNIST数据集已经集成在pytorch datasets中，可以直接调用
train_dataset = datasets.MNIST(root='./data/',
train=True,
transform=transforms.ToTensor(),
download=True)

test_dataset = datasets.MNIST(root='./data/',
train=False,
transform=transforms.ToTensor())

# Data Loader (Input Pipeline)
train_loader = torch.utils.data.DataLoader(dataset=train_dataset,
batch_size=batch_size,
shuffle=True)

test_loader = torch.utils.data.DataLoader(dataset=test_dataset,
batch_size=batch_size,
shuffle=False)

class Net(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super(Net, self).__init__()
# 输入1通道，输出10通道，kernel 5*5
self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(in_channels=1, out_channels=10, kernel_size=5)
self.conv2 = nn.Conv2d(10, 20, 5)
self.conv3 = nn.Conv2d(20, 40, 3)

self.mp = nn.MaxPool2d(2)
# fully connect
self.fc = nn.Linear(40, 10)#（in_features, out_features）

def forward(self, x):
# in_size = 64
# one batch 此时的x是包含batchsize维度为4的tensor，即(batchsize，channels，x，y)
# x.size(0)指batchsize的值把batchsize的值作为网络的in_size
in_size = x.size(0)
# x: 64*1*28*28
x = F.relu(self.mp(self.conv1(x)))
# x: 64*10*12*12 (n+2p-f)/s + 1 = 28 - 5 + 1 = 24,所以在没有池化的时候是24*24,池化层为2*2 ，所以池化之后为12*12
x = F.relu(self.mp(self.conv2(x)))
# x: 64*20*4*4 同理，没有池化的时候是12 - 5 + 1 = 8 ，池化后为4*4
x = F.relu(self.mp(self.conv3(x)))
# 输出x : 64*40*2*2

x = x.view(in_size, -1) # 平铺 tensor 相当于resharp
# print(x.size())
# x: 64*320
x = self.fc(x)
# x:64*10
# print(x.size())
return F.log_softmax(x) #64*10

model = Net()
model.cuda()
# optimizer = optim.SGD(model.parameters(), lr=0.001, momentum=0.5)
# optimizer = adabound.AdaBound(model.parameters(), lr=1e-3, final_lr=0.1)
optimizer = optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=0.001)

def train(epoch):
# enumerate()枚举、列举，对于一个可迭代/遍历的对象，enumerate将其组成一个索引序列，利用它可以同时获得索引和值
for batch_idx, (data, target) in enumerate(train_loader): # batch_idx是enumerate（）函数自带的索引，从0开始
# data.size():[64, 1, 28, 28]
# target.size():[64]
output = model(data.cuda())
# print(batch_idx)
# output:64*10
loss = F.nll_loss(output, target.cuda())
# 每200次，输出一次数据
# if batch_idx % 200 == 0:
# print('Train Epoch: {} [{}/{} ({:.0f}%)]\tLoss: {:.6f}'.
# format(
# epoch,
# batch_idx * len(data),
# len(train_loader.dataset),
# 100. * batch_idx / len(train_loader),
# loss.item()))

optimizer.zero_grad() # 所有参数的梯度清零
loss.backward() #即反向传播求梯度
optimizer.step() #调用optimizer进行梯度下降更新参数

for epoch in range(1, 30):
print("test num"+str(epoch))
train(epoch)
test()

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
七、参考资料及获得的帮助
AdaBound详解【首发】
完成本次实验得到了何树林同学的大力支持
本次实验的代码在网上参考修改，由于不慎关闭了相关页面……找不到出处了，如果有雷同，请及时告诉我，以便在此声明参考出处。
---------------------
作者：IMU_YY
来源：CSDN
原文：https://blog.csdn.net/yyhaohaoxuexi/article/details/88133007
版权声明：本文为博主原创文章，转载请附上博文链接！

Pytorch实现MNIST（附SGD、Adam、AdaBound不同优化器下的训练比较） adabound实现

猜你喜欢