深入理解Android音视频同步机制（五）如何从零开始写一个音视频同步的播放器

其他 2018-10-30 19:51:42 阅读次数: 0
版权声明：本文为博主原创文章，未经博主允许不得转载。 https://blog.csdn.net/nonmarking/article/details/78747369

前面我们分析了三个播放器的av sync逻辑，可以看到他们都各有不同，那么究竟哪种方法可以达到最好的avsync结果？哪些逻辑是必要的？如果我们想自己从零开始写一个av同步的播放器，都需要做哪些工作？

首先我们测试了几个播放器的音视频同步表现，使用的是syncOne官网的1080p 24fps H264 AAC测试片源，只测试speaker下的结果，测试结果如下
这里写图片描述
下面我们参考cts中的mediacodec使用示例，尝试着写出一个avsync结果与上面结果接近的播放器

MediaCodecPlayer Demo

demo的地址如下：
https://github.com/zhanghuicuc/simplest_android_avplayer

首先来看一下整体流程，如下图所示
这里写图片描述
总体流程和ExoPlayer基本相似。图中的doSomeWork是核心大loop，同步地调用MediaCodc接口，关键的avsync逻辑在drainOutputBuffer方法中实现。

最朴素简单的同步逻辑

先来总体说一下同步逻辑，然后再详细看看代码

Video部分

1.对实际送显时间的计算

private boolean drainOutputBuffer()

//传入参数为pts，返回的realTimeUs其实就是pts，并没有做什么调整
   long realTimeUs =
       mMediaTimeProvider.getRealTimeUsForMediaTime(info.presentationTimeUs);

   //这里的nowUs代表audio播放的时间
   long nowUs = mMediaTimeProvider.getNowUs(); //audio play time
   //nowUs - realTimeUs代表还有多久该播放这一帧
   long lateUs = nowUs - realTimeUs;
…
    //这里调用的是没有timestamp参数的releaseOutputBuffer方法
    mCodec.releaseOutputBuffer(index, render);

Audio部分

1、current play time的计算

public long getAudioTimeUs()

//这里返回audio的播放时间，就是利用的getPlaybackHeadPosition方法
   int numFramesPlayed = mAudioTrack.getPlaybackHeadPosition();
   return (numFramesPlayed * 1000000L) / mSampleRate;

小结

就是拿video的pts与audioTrack.getPlaybackHeadPosition方法返回的播放时间进行对比，然后直接调用没有timestamp参数的releaseOutputBuffer的方法进行显示

详细的代码如下

private boolean drainOutputBuffer() {
...
   int index = mAvailableOutputBufferIndices.peekFirst().intValue();
   MediaCodec.BufferInfo info = mAvailableOutputBufferInfos.peekFirst();
…
   //传入参数为pts，返回的realTimeUs其实就是pts，并没有做什么调整，参见1.1
   long realTimeUs =
       mMediaTimeProvider.getRealTimeUsForMediaTime(info.presentationTimeUs);

   //这里的nowUs代表audio播放的时间，参见1.1
   long nowUs = mMediaTimeProvider.getNowUs(); //audio play time
   //nowUs - realTimeUs代表还有多久该播放这一帧
   long lateUs = nowUs - realTimeUs;

   if (mAudioTrack != null) {
       ...
   } else {
       // video
       boolean render;

       if (lateUs < -45000) {
           // too early;如果video来早了45ms，则等待下一次loop
           return false;
       } else if (lateUs > 30000) {
           //默认的丢帧门限是30ms
           Log.d(TAG, "video late by " + lateUs + " us.");
           render = false;
       } else {
           render = true;
           mPresentationTimeUs = info.presentationTimeUs;
       }

       //这里调用的是没有timestamp参数的releaseOutputBuffer方法
       mCodec.releaseOutputBuffer(index, render);

       mAvailableOutputBufferIndices.removeFirst();
       mAvailableOutputBufferInfos.removeFirst();
       return true;
   }
}

public long getRealTimeUsForMediaTime(long mediaTimeUs) {
   if (mDeltaTimeUs == -1) {
      //第一次调用的时候会走进这个分支，mDeltaTimeUs代表初始pts的偏差，正常情况下它是0
       long nowUs = getNowUs();
       mDeltaTimeUs = nowUs - mediaTimeUs;
   }
   //所以getRealTimeUsForMediaTime返回的就是pts
   return mDeltaTimeUs + mediaTimeUs;
}

public long getNowUs() {
   //如果是video only的流，则返回系统时间，否则返回audio播放的时间
   if (mAudioTrackState == null) {
       return System.currentTimeMillis() * 1000;
   }

   return mAudioTrackState.getAudioTimeUs();
}

public long getAudioTimeUs() {
   //这里返回audio的播放时间，就是利用的getPlaybackHeadPosition方法
   int numFramesPlayed = mAudioTrack.getPlaybackHeadPosition();

   return (numFramesPlayed * 1000000L) / mSampleRate;
}

测试一下这个最简单avsync逻辑的结果 ： -173ms，果然惨不忍睹

第一步改造

改造audio time的获取，加上latency

public long getAudioTimeUs() {
  int numFramesPlayed = mAudioTrack.getPlaybackHeadPosition();
  if (getLatencyMethod != null) {
      try {
          latencyUs = (Integer) getLatencyMethod.invoke(mAudioTrack, (Object[]) null) * 1000L /2;
          latencyUs = Math.max(latencyUs, 0);
      } catch (Exception e){
          getLatencyMethod = null;
      }
  }
  return (numFramesPlayed * 1000000L) / mSampleRate - latencyUs;
}

此时的测试结果是：-128ms， 好了一些，但还不够

第二步改造

考虑到getLatency方法是一个被google自己吐槽的接口，我们再来下一步改造，用上getTimeStamp方法，如下

public long getAudioTimeUs() {
   long systemClockUs = System.nanoTime() / 1000;
   int numFramesPlayed = mAudioTrack.getPlaybackHeadPosition();
   if (systemClockUs - lastTimestampSampleTimeUs >= MIN_TIMESTAMP_SAMPLE_INTERVAL_US) {
       audioTimestampSet = mAudioTrack.getTimestamp(audioTimestamp);
       if (getLatencyMethod != null) {
           try {
               latencyUs = (Integer) getLatencyMethod.invoke(mAudioTrack, (Object[]) null) * 1000L / 2;
               latencyUs = Math.max(latencyUs, 0);
           } catch (Exception e) {
               getLatencyMethod = null;
           }
       }
       lastTimestampSampleTimeUs = systemClockUs;
   }

   if (audioTimestampSet) {
       // Calculate the speed-adjusted position using the timestamp (which may be in the future).
       long elapsedSinceTimestampUs = System.nanoTime() / 1000 - (audioTimestamp.nanoTime / 1000);
       long elapsedSinceTimestampFrames = elapsedSinceTimestampUs * mSampleRate / 1000000L;
       long elapsedFrames = audioTimestamp.framePosition + elapsedSinceTimestampFrames;
       long durationUs = (elapsedFrames * 1000000L) / mSampleRate;
       return durationUs;
   } else {
       long durationUs = (numFramesPlayed * 1000000L) / mSampleRate - latencyUs;
       //durationUs = Math.max(durationUs, 0);
       return durationUs;
   }
}

当我们对比getTimeStamp和getPosition返回的结果，就能发现两者的精度差距

1.getPosition, 最后的nowUs代表audio播放的duration
12-06 16:11:47.695 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 166667,realTimeUs is 46667,nowUs is 40000
12-06 16:11:47.696 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 208333,realTimeUs is 88333,nowUs is 40000
12-06 16:11:47.700 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 362666,realTimeUs is 242666,nowUs is 40000
12-06 16:11:47.706 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 208333,realTimeUs is 88333,nowUs is 40000
12-06 16:11:47.707 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 384000,realTimeUs is 264000,nowUs is 40000
12-06 16:11:47.714 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 208333,realTimeUs is 88333,nowUs is 80000
12-06 16:11:47.716 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 250000,realTimeUs is 130000,nowUs is 80000
12-06 16:11:47.720 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 405333,realTimeUs is 285333,nowUs is 80000
12-06 16:11:47.726 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 250000,realTimeUs is 130000,nowUs is 80000
12-06 16:11:47.728 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 426666,realTimeUs is 306666,nowUs is 80000
12-06 16:11:47.734 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 250000,realTimeUs is 130000,nowUs is 80000
12-06 16:11:47.736 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 448000,realTimeUs is 328000,nowUs is 120000
12-06 16:11:47.742 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 250000,realTimeUs is 130000,nowUs is 120000
12-06 16:11:47.743 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 291667,realTimeUs is 171667,nowUs is 120000
12-06 16:11:47.746 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 469333,realTimeUs is 349333,nowUs is 120000
12-06 16:11:47.753 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 291667,realTimeUs is 171667,nowUs is 120000
12-06 16:11:47.756 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 490666,realTimeUs is 370666,nowUs is 120000
12-06 16:11:47.764 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 291667,realTimeUs is 171667,nowUs is 160000
12-06 16:11:47.764 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 333333,realTimeUs is 213333,nowUs is 160000
12-06 16:11:47.767 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 512000,realTimeUs is 392000,nowUs is 160000
12-06 16:11:47.774 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 333333,realTimeUs is 213333,nowUs is 160000
12-06 16:11:47.776 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 533333,realTimeUs is 413333,nowUs is 160000
12-06 16:11:47.782 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 333333,realTimeUs is 213333,nowUs is 160000
12-06 16:11:47.783 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 554666,realTimeUs is 434666,nowUs is 160000
12-06 16:11:47.790 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 333333,realTimeUs is 213333,nowUs is 160000
12-06 16:11:47.791 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 576000,realTimeUs is 456000,nowUs is 160000
12-06 16:11:47.798 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 333333,realTimeUs is 213333,nowUs is 160000
12-06 16:11:47.806 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 597333,realTimeUs is 477333,nowUs is 200000
12-06 16:11:47.813 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 333333,realTimeUs is 213333,nowUs is 200000
12-06 16:11:47.814 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 375000,realTimeUs is 255000,nowUs is 200000
12-06 16:11:47.817 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 618666,realTimeUs is 498666,nowUs is 200000
12-06 16:11:47.825 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 375000,realTimeUs is 255000,nowUs is 200000
12-06 16:11:47.827 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 640000,realTimeUs is 520000,nowUs is 200000
12-06 16:11:47.836 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 375000,realTimeUs is 255000,nowUs is 200000
12-06 16:11:47.840 20194-20657/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 661333,realTimeUs is 541333,nowUs is 200000

2.getTimeStamp，同样的，最后的nowUs代表audio播放的duration，其实这其中的一大部分功劳也是因为系统时间参与了计算
12-06 16:17:22.122 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 333333,realTimeUs is 213333,nowUs is 161312
12-06 16:17:22.124 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 554666,realTimeUs is 434666,nowUs is 163250
12-06 16:17:22.131 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 333333,realTimeUs is 213333,nowUs is 170125
12-06 16:17:22.131 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 375000,realTimeUs is 255000,nowUs is 170562
12-06 16:17:22.133 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 576000,realTimeUs is 456000,nowUs is 172666
12-06 16:17:22.141 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 375000,realTimeUs is 255000,nowUs is 180604
12-06 16:17:22.142 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 597333,realTimeUs is 477333,nowUs is 181666
12-06 16:17:22.150 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 375000,realTimeUs is 255000,nowUs is 189937
12-06 16:17:22.153 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 618666,realTimeUs is 498666,nowUs is 192145
12-06 16:17:22.159 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 375000,realTimeUs is 255000,nowUs is 198458
12-06 16:17:22.160 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 640000,realTimeUs is 520000,nowUs is 199687
12-06 16:17:22.166 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 375000,realTimeUs is 255000,nowUs is 205520
12-06 16:17:22.167 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 661333,realTimeUs is 541333,nowUs is 206812
12-06 16:17:22.173 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 375000,realTimeUs is 255000,nowUs is 212895
12-06 16:17:22.174 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 416667,realTimeUs is 296667,nowUs is 213104
12-06 16:17:22.176 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: audio: presentationUs is 682666,realTimeUs is 562666,nowUs is 215125
12-06 16:17:22.182 30072-30257/com.example.zhanghui.avplayer D/avsync: video: presentationUs is 416667,realTimeUs is 296667,nowUs is 221479

此时的测试结果是：-87.5ms， 好了一些，已经达到和ijkPlayer差不多的水平了，是否还能更好呢？

第三步改造

基于vsync调整送显时间

audio部分似乎已经没什么可以改的了，下面我们来看看video部分加上基于vsync的调整后会怎么样，前面我们看到在最朴素的逻辑中，使用的是不带timestamp参数的releaseOutputBuffer方法，实际上，这时在framework中会把pts作为timestamp传进去，如下

status_t MediaCodec::onReleaseOutputBuffer(const sp<AMessage> &msg) {
...
    BufferInfo *info = &mPortBuffers[kPortIndexOutput].editItemAt(index);
...
    if (render && info->mData != NULL && info->mData->size() != 0) {
        info->mNotify->setInt32("render", true);

        int64_t mediaTimeUs = -1;
        info->mData->meta()->findInt64("timeUs", &mediaTimeUs);

        int64_t renderTimeNs = 0;
        if (!msg->findInt64("timestampNs", &renderTimeNs)) {
            // use media timestamp if client did not request a specific render timestamp
            ALOGV("using buffer PTS of %lld", (long long)mediaTimeUs);
            renderTimeNs = mediaTimeUs * 1000;
        }
...

简单起见，我们直接复用exoplayer中基于vsync调整的逻辑，做如下修改

这个方法以前是直接返回pts，现在我们让他返回经过vsync调整后的release时间
public long getRealTimeUsForMediaTime(long mediaTimeUs) {
   if (mDeltaTimeUs == -1) {
       long nowUs = getNowUs();
       mDeltaTimeUs = nowUs - mediaTimeUs; //-32000
   }
   long earlyUs = mDeltaTimeUs + mediaTimeUs - getNowUs();
   long unadjustedFrameReleaseTimeNs = System.nanoTime() + (earlyUs * 1000);
   long adjustedReleaseTimeNs = frameReleaseTimeHelper.adjustReleaseTime(
           mediaTimeUs, unadjustedFrameReleaseTimeNs);
   return adjustedReleaseTimeNs / 1000;
}

相应的，在drainOutputBuffer中也要改一下
private boolean drainOutputBuffer() {
   ...

   long realTimeUs =
       mMediaTimeProvider.getRealTimeUsForMediaTime(info.presentationTimeUs); //返回调整后的releaseTime

   long nowUs = mMediaTimeProvider.getNowUs(); //audio play time

   long lateUs = System.nanoTime()/1000 - realTimeUs;

   if (mAudioTrack != null) {
       ...
       return true;
   } else {
       // video
       ….

       //mCodec.releaseOutputBuffer(index, render);
       mCodec.releaseOutputBuffer(index, realTimeUs*1000);
       mAvailableOutputBufferIndices.removeFirst();
       mAvailableOutputBufferInfos.removeFirst();
       return true;
   }
}

此时的测试结果是-76ms，又好了一些，但是已经不甚明显了，能不能再做进一步的优化呢？

第四步改造

提前两倍vsync时间调用releaseOutputBuffer

我们想到之前在NuPlayer和MediaSync中都有提前两倍vsync duration时间调用releaseOutputBuffer方法的逻辑，加上试试看，如下

private boolean drainOutputBuffer() {
  ...
   long lateUs = System.nanoTime()/1000 - realTimeUs;

   if (mAudioTrack != null) {
      …
   } else {
       // video
       boolean render;
       //这里改为如果video比预期release时间来的早了2*vsyncduration时间以上，则跳过并且进入下次循环，否则予以显示
       long twiceVsyncDurationUs = 2 * mMediaTimeProvider.getVsyncDurationNs()/1000;
       if (lateUs < -twiceVsyncDurationUs) {
           // too early;
           return false;
       } else if (lateUs > 30000) {
           Log.d(TAG, "video late by " + lateUs + " us.");
           render = false;
       } else {
           render = true;
           mPresentationTimeUs = info.presentationTimeUs;
       }

       //mCodec.releaseOutputBuffer(index, render);
       mCodec.releaseOutputBuffer(index, realTimeUs*1000);
...
   }
}

此时的测试结果是-66ms，又好了一点点，但是同样已经不甚明显了

第五步改造

再做一些微调
比如在解码audio时也做了一轮vsync调整，这显然是多余的，去掉它

private boolean drainOutputBuffer() {

   if (mAudioTrack != null) {
   } else {
       // video
       boolean render;
       long twiceVsyncDurationUs = 2 * mMediaTimeProvider.getVsyncDurationNs()/1000;

       long realTimeUs =
               mMediaTimeProvider.getRealTimeUsForMediaTime(info.presentationTimeUs); 
       long nowUs = mMediaTimeProvider.getNowUs(); //audio play time
       long lateUs = System.nanoTime()/1000 - realTimeUs;
     ...
       mCodec.releaseOutputBuffer(index, realTimeUs*1000);
       mAvailableOutputBufferIndices.removeFirst();
       mAvailableOutputBufferInfos.removeFirst();
       return true;
   }
}

此时测试的结果是-56ms，看似是和avsync无关的调整，却也产生了一定的效果，也从侧面证明了根据vsync调整releaseTime是一个很耗时的操作

总结一下我们每一步所做的事情和avsync优化的结果，如此，我们可以更好地理解avsync逻辑中各个环节的必要性和所产生的影响了

这里写图片描述

各位看官，如果您觉得本人的博客对您有所帮助，可以扫描如下二维码进行打赏，打赏多少您随意~
这里写图片描述

猜你喜欢

转载自blog.csdn.net/nonmarking/article/details/78747369
今日推荐
火速冲上 GitHub 热榜 —— 开源编程语言、框架哪有这么可爱？
北京人形机器人创新中心发布全球首个纯电驱拟人奔跑的全尺寸人形机器人“天工”
LFOSSA 源来如此公开课 | 掌握云原生未来：CNCF 认证全面攻略与备考秘籍
国产云输入法——仅华为无云端数据上传安全问题
开源日报 | 工业开源项目OGG 1.0；姐姐，你要和我一起配置火狐吗；苹果AI遥遥落后？Fedora 40
开放签电子签章：停止新增，优化体验，前进更进（五一假期前工作）
周排行
Metasploit文件目录与入侵基本概念
跨域(CORS)请求问题[No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource]常见解决方案
CodeIgniter 源码解读之 CodeIgniter.php（二）
SAS入门之（四）改变数据类型
初识元组
[数学建模]数学建模算法和模型（B站视频）（二）
Nginx 服务器源码安装配置流程
C#实现语音视频录制 【基于MCapture + MFile】
开发进度4
下载安装vue的方法网址
每日归档
更多
2024-04-28(0)
2024-04-27(56)
2024-04-26(39)
2024-04-25(22)
2024-04-24(36)
2024-04-23(26)
2024-04-22(39)
2024-04-21(0)
2024-04-20(6)
2024-04-19(5)

代码天地 © 2018 codetd.com

境外服务器   最新电视剧2022