First, the red core events
August 16, 2018, claiming to "break the US monopoly, China's first independent innovation intelligent browser kernel" red core browser, was found "just Google browser to change a layer of skin," not only code that excessive comment, the code redundancy Yu, the old language, data security is also questionable, group ridicule by many programmers.
Second, my comments
Innovation based on the existing mode of thinking, different from the conventional ideas put forward ideas, not imitation but not plagiarism. Notes section of the code is essential, but the main function is to remind the comment of a programmer to use a piece of code, add a comment if every sentence, not only reduces the efficiency even more redundant. More importantly, the safety concerns, if a software can not guarantee its security, no one is willing to use it.
Third, I agree with the point of view
1, endorsed Huajiu lucid point of view, point of view: innovation needs to learn when to push technology to the old people's home to introduce new, rather than a full copy. Code comments also only use in key areas.
2, 180 endorsed the view was not good enough, ideas: the real innovation requires courage to break the routine, rather than to copy. Comments of the code need only note Important place excessive annotation redundant, but a waste of time.
3, shared the views of users 5214282032833, views: write comments where needed, each row does not need to write comments. Predecessors' achievements now a lot of companies are doing, but it is immoral for the benefit of over-hyped.
4, endorsed wow small - alas point of view, point of view: the so-called browser kernel "indigenous innovation" defense system "Hidden Shield", but in fact is based on the Google browser kernel, and can not achieve the safety performance propaganda. Such excessive publicity people have been cheated feeling.
