Event: A year ago (2018), low red core browser claiming to be the kernel level of innovation accused the code level for commercial purposes false propaganda to mislead the public.
my point of view:
First of all, what is innovation? Because human intelligence is not yet out of thin air to create a thing, so everything's innovation is standing on the shoulders of giants. Red core browser is not innovation? I believe that innovation and plagiarism are not contradictory, if not all of the copy there must be innovative part. However, the innovative part of the product is not that innovation? This eyes of the beholder, the wise see wisdom. I believe that innovation does not lie in how much copied, but rather innovative part is not constructive, valuable. Innovation must move forward in a way, if the red core browser code more concise, notes clearer, more user-friendly interface, can be called innovation, but from the results, the red core did not do, that this species can only be called a cottage, innovation does not meet the requirements. Red core of innovation may focus on the hidden shield, although it may not reach the publicity effect, the product can not be considered innovative, but this idea be considered an innovation.
In addition, red-core era for commercial benefit, with the words on some of the big publicity, sale of national identity, to the role confuse, it is indeed illegal, but to do business in order to maximize the benefits, inevitably in illegal the edge of madness tempted, as a piece said: there is a book full of big money method, the book is the criminal law. This is not a red core era's problems, but since no, there is no room can be forgiven. And its cooperation are some large enterprises and companies, if the browser's security can not be guaranteed may lead to unpredictable consequences. But it should not matter, after all, important things inside the company must have their own security measures, will not rely on a browser. Red core event is just a very common business problems, not cause storms.
Finally talk about the era of red core programmers. Open source era, this level of fraud even better than food safety resolution. They work just like college students cope with the job, as even the copy may not read how to read, given a free hand to change to change took out to sell. Logically speaking browser kernel is not a small company can do it, they lie to deceive those who do not understand that line, to obtain user base.
self-discipline9892 view: The company just wanted to write a system to access the company's intranet application, you need to rely on the browser, the browser developed for a small company is impossible, so the completion of development tasks by chorme mating plug, reasonable, the only company in order to finance blowing too much, extremely redundant code and the Notes, did not look like a regular company developed, it may be just to get money.
5214282032833 user point of view: First, write a comment not a bad thing, but mainly before writing comments in class, written before the method, written after the variable declaration, write code like this each row is perhaps the company's requirements, but it is no need. Secondly, code redundancy is doing it, the object-oriented programming is to reduce the repetition code, now the class properties and methods are substantially encapsulated. Apply Google's Chorme file is understandable, after all predecessors' achievements is today many companies do, but it is immoral for the benefit of over-hyped
Huajiu Qingming 3 opinions: First talk about the success of software products, so many public opinion has revealed that there is a serious false propaganda red core company problems, thus revealing the presence of the biggest problems of today's domestic software, the core code. This need is innovation, to which we have red core more understanding, because in today's information age blend, entirely behind closed doors simply not realistic, so I think the new era of innovation is needed in someone's home draw tear down the old time of the introduction of new technologies, rather than a full copy. As for code comments, I think that before the on-line products, exchanges and cooperation between the team needs the necessary code comments, but only need to key in place, rather than a simple excuse for any, even the repeated notes, which appear to be no reason to scrape together the number of rows. In the on-line product, code comments to the confidentiality of the product, safety, should be removed, if you must display the characteristics of some products, the most incompetent but also the English notes, because the Internet age, a good software product to face often the world!
180 not good enough point of view: the real innovation requires courage to break the routine, to do the unprecedented things. Rather than blindly copy, such as red core ism, there is no morality. In addition, I think the comments of the code simply note Important place undue comment superfluous, a waste of time.
