First, the red core events
August 16, 2018, claiming to "break the US monopoly, China's first independent innovation intelligent browser kernel" red core browser, named by copying the packaging Google browser, and there are plenty of amateur annotation and data cache did as they declared as encrypted.
Second, my comments
There is the phenomenon of so-called plagiarism misappropriating red core, in fact, the market is not unusual, is an innovative software application development, immediately following the question is how to deal with a lot of copying software on the market, even a lot of copying software is innovative software also crushed have occurred, it is worth pondering.
Red core released a statement released with the actual browser serious discrepancies, which did serious damage to his company's reputation, this self-deceiving behavior beg to differ.
Questions about the comment code, a large number of comments does seem redundant pages and amateur, but took no comment codes people can not tolerate. As a large IT company, really we should not have made such a stupid mistake.
Third, I agree with the point of view
1. Programming of people hate to write notes, to see people hate did not comment, appropriate comment is indeed very important, but enough is enough.
2. There is not enough professionalism does not qualify random reviews of others, but even a layman can have the ability to judge right and wrong.
3. The main focus should be placed on the code, should not really write a lot of redundant complicated notes, expensive, not much.
