Software Designer Exam Preparation Experience

Personal situation: I just graduated from the undergraduate degree of computer science and technology. I started to prepare for software designers in September. I took the exam in November, intermittently for two months. During the period, I didn’t review for two weeks. I have some help, and when I was preparing for the exam, I also got some experience, and I hope to share it with you.
The reason why I want to share it on csdn is because many people who take the soft test are not workers in the industry, or are not from majors, and have little contact with professional knowledge before, so everyone’s preparation focus and ideas are still somewhat different, and I can’t say that I remember them all. Professional knowledge, I just want to share my feelings about preparing for the exam from the perspective of taking these professional courses.

Attached the results first:
insert image description here
First,

  • Books: Two officially designated textbooks (purchased by Salted Fish)
  • Teaching video: Station B ([Software Designer Exam Tutorial - Bilibili] https://b23.tv/83IBCek ) also has Baidu cloud disk resources in its comments:
    link: https://pan.baidu.com/s /1WHv7JanZSlZNd4D27-mhEw
    extraction code: r0ee
  • Mobile APP: Ruan Kao Tong
  • Website of previous years’ real questions: Xinguan.com
  • My review notes (that is, the screenshots taken while watching the video, because it takes time to recall the book, so I use my notes to recall the chapters) also contain the design patterns I organized, just remember the keywords, understand and understand, it is not necessary Look at the design pattern class diagram,
    review the notes and upload it to my csdn, you can download it yourself
    insert image description here

The process framework is to first watch
a chapter video + read the corresponding chapter textbook + do the chapter’s questions + read the analysis of the questions . The actual framework: always deviates from the plan more or less

I believe that everyone will have a headache when they see the official textbook, because it is huge and the teaching video is very short. The key points of each chapter will be introduced in the video. I will watch the teaching video first, and organize a video note by the way to recall the solution of the question type later , after reading it, read the key knowledge in this chapter. Because it talks about the test points and the form of the questions in the video.
To be honest, when you read such a thick book, you forget all the previous chapters, and many things and languages ​​in it are designed to help you understand, which is rather cumbersome. After watching the video, you can at least match the professional knowledge you learned at that time. When you finish the video and read the textbook and do the questions, you will find that there are many emphases and questions in the exercise booklet that are relatively biased, so you need to look at the analysis of the wrong questions.
The above set of procedures is a basic routine. Just after reading the book, you will definitely be able to do all the questions. What is unbearable is that time will make us forget the knowledge points and question types. This requires a mobile app to pass the test. This software is purely free and has no advertisements. , just concentrate on writing the questions according to the chapters. The questions in it are more inclined to the exam questions than the exercise textbooks. The question types of each chapter are also easy to summarize. Take a notebook and write each typical question. You can only read your own notes later. That's fine.
Regarding the review order of the chapters, I did not review them in order. First of all, the scores of each chapter of the test are different, and then my own situation is also different. For example, after watching the video of some chapters, I found that the question types are the same as those I have learned before, then I can do it Skip the link of reading the textbooks, just do the questions and practice, so I pick my weak points and give priority to reviewing those with high scores.
In the last three chapters, I didn’t read the textbooks, and I didn’t do the questions. It means that everyone should be flexible. It’s not that other people’s tutorials and experiences should be used directly. I feel that I don’t pay as much as those on the Internet, so I just work hard for the sake of hard work.
Some people may think that it takes a long time to do a set of real questions, and they don’t want to do it. In fact, they don’t have to do it. Just remember it.
It is an exam, the core, and the key point is the design pattern , not only in the morning, but also in the afternoon. The core pattern form I compiled is in the compressed package, and you can download it. On my way to the exam, I was remembering the keywords of the design pattern.
partial screenshot

The questions in the morning are all single-choice, and there are fixed questions that will be asked. If you get these scores completely, you are almost on the verge of passing. The rest are the accumulation of usual questions, some fragmentary. Then there are some extensions. I haven't seen it at all during the review process, but it's only a few points. Most of the knowledge I haven't seen is basic computer knowledge. I didn’t prepare for the last 5 multiple-choice questions. After doing the questions, I found that I was too tired to accumulate them. At that time, I can see whether the questions are related to the knowledge areas I have understood. I took the test of devops, which just happened. I have been in contact with it before, and I generally understand it, so if I understand English, I will do it according to reading comprehension.
In the afternoon, the question types are very fixed, just watch the video, do the questions, and summarize, that's all.

This is generally the case. The morning questions are still difficult, because the knowledge points involved are relatively wide and there are many things to memorize. Instead, the afternoon questions only need to be understood.

Guess you like

Origin blog.csdn.net/weixin_42650480/article/details/122114108