It is more fair to use anonymous review in the scientific research project review system

  The scientific research project evaluation system has been put into use by many scientific research management institutions or units. In order to ensure the professionalism and scientificity of scientific research project evaluation, the scientific research management system must have functions during expert evaluation. Because the review process and expert selection method of each scientific research institution is different, the system settings of expert review will be different. Among many evaluation methods, it is more fair to use anonymous evaluation in the scientific research project evaluation system.

  "As an evaluation expert or project applicant, I have participated in various aspects of the evaluation of scientific and technological projects organized by the Ministry of Science and Technology, the National Natural Science Foundation of China and other departments for many times. , it is recommended to do a good job in the evaluation of scientific and technological projects, to build a national scientific and technological project evaluation expert database, and secondly to pay full attention to the anonymous online evaluation process, and pay attention to the protection of participating experts during the evaluation process of the conference." Wang Yongtian, member of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference and professor of Beijing Institute of Technology Say.

  It is not difficult to realize anonymous review if we can combine the suggestions of Professor Wang and take advantage of the characteristics of the scientific research project review system. As long as an expert reserve is established, and some basics are used to randomly select experts through computing technology and some data mining technology. Then push the application materials to the relevant experts, without giving too detailed information on the project sponsors. Experts can view the content of other expert reviews, but not every expert review is anonymous. In this way, the factors that interfere with each other can be reduced, and the professionalism and scientificity of the review can be improved.

  It is more fair to use anonymous review in the scientific research project review system. How to realize it is determined by the algorithm ideas of the development engineer of the scientific research project review system and the technology of the development team. The key to the anonymous review is that the number of experts should be sufficient, the level of experts should be high, and the matching degree of experts should be high. To achieve these, the establishment of experts' storage conditions and the selection of how to intelligently select suitable experts for project review are crucial.

  This article is reproduced from Tuoyuan Youke: www.toyoke.com

Guess you like

Origin http://10.200.1.11:23101/article/api/json?id=326557747&siteId=291194637