There is a recent news that the Americans broke into the Chinese Embassy in Houston. In the case of inexplicable disputes between international politics, there are always screws-like legs to enforce. Just like the military, they will not question the higher framework. With higher morality and higher implementation meaning, everything they have been trained tells them to complete their functions within the existing structure, and they can feel the satisfaction of life value.
This is actually the truth for everyone. Many times people live by relying on the social structure. This world does not need more and more smart people. All education, such as the nine-year compulsory education itself, is based on the social structure to export talents. It is up to the individual to bear the uncertainty brought about by market changes. From all the education, why did you teach you various equations and formulas when you first came up? Because these are things that can be used directly at the execution level. As for imagination and intelligence, the understanding of basic scientific facts, the entire education system will not cultivate you.
Because "this society lacks not smart people, but stupid people who are'just right'". (This statement only refers to the social structure)
I am actually very scared. I am afraid that as I age, I will become more and more stupid. The so-called stupidity means that you are gradually being structured, either by society or because of the decline in vitality. Structured.
When I think about this, I have no reason to be happy.
So in fact, from the truth of the “structured” world mentioned above, I also want to explain that since ancient times, since humans began to live in clusters, in order to maintain the slow-evolving social scenes, various kinds of social scenes have appeared constantly The identity is used to maintain the order of the entire society.
We must know that the feudal society has spread for two thousand years. The small peasant economy + feudal rule has built a 2000-year social history. No one thinks this is wrong. Maybe most people still think that the modern history of China will really start around 1900. They don’t think that the Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing reigns did anything wrong, and they even think that these cultures are precious national quintessence.
But if we simply think about it, the modern history of Europe began in the 17th century. What is the origin of the beginning of modern history? Behind it is the circulation of commerce, and if the feudal ruling class is willing to encourage commercial development, actively open the country to look for competitors, and realize that productivity is the essence of everything, then it will not be the feudal dynasty that goes all the way to the dark, every time it lasts for hundreds of years. The descendants were driven to extinction, and science and culture did not improve.
So have you found that feudal rule is also a scapegoat. Each generation of monarchs enjoys their power, regardless of how the last emperor of the dynasty-"his descendants" was slaughtered by traitorous officials. But since the Qin and Han Dynasties, this basic law should be discovered. There is no eternal dynasty, and even the longest dynasty in Europe is only a thousand years old.
As the top of these feudal centralized powers, what do you think they are thinking? They think the same thing as all entrepreneurs is that they can only maintain their own status in the established structure. If you do not do it, others do it, so I might as well stand at the top of the social structure.
In fact, people are forced to "climb to the top of society." This is okay in normal times, but in a period of change, it may become a serious problem. For example, you are willing to be Cao Cao, Cao Pi, Cao Rui, but you are absolutely unwilling Be Cao Fang.
Why has the situation changed now? It is because of "the rise of decentralization."
Maks said that "the future society is a communist society" nearly 200 years ago. This shows that 200 years ago, it can be foreseen that the structure of this society is actually from feudal rule, to bourgeois rule, and then to proletarian rule. From the perspective of social structure, it is actually a trend that the army and unified management empower the aristocracy, the capital machine empowers the bourgeoisie, and the collaborative construction tools empower the proletariat.
What is lacking now is the "co-construction tool". Once this tool is born, it will face the same historical role as steam engines and generators, because it will create a new class.
You will find that since humans entered the capitalist society around the 18th century, this social structure has not changed. The proletariat has always been a "screw" working for the capital machine. In fact, it concentrates on making a screw to help the capital machine industry. To achieve greater value and fulfill the historical mission of capitalism, we should devote ourselves to it, perhaps even life should be banned.
But in the future, the proletariat will have its own tools to build scenarios. In the fields of information, social interaction, e-commerce, etc., it no longer needs to be a screw of the capital machine, because when the "low-level architecture" is built, everyone can make a lower Cost participates in social collaboration.
For example: when Douyin was first born, it was all showing off beautiful, beautiful and cool content, but only four or five years later, the entire Douyin has a variety of categories such as popular science, funny, story series, and users With continuous professionalization of production capacity, individuals can produce very high-quality content even without professional studio support.
Now look at the user active time of UGC content and compare it with the user active time of PGC's film and television app? Compare the frequency again? Compare the update speed, volume and entertainment effect brought by?
In fact, it's not just entertainment. All individuals in social scenes gradually have the ability to participate professionally. Is the service you contacted through the big platform necessarily better than the content produced by the small organization? Do not.
The underlying logic involved in this is that "the efficiency of the value generated by individual construction of scenes is 10 times, 100 times, or even 1000 times higher than the efficiency of centralized scene output" can come. Short video self-media is an example. Why is there such a change? Analyze:
"People finally have a UGC platform: There is a platform for UGC to produce content, which can realize instant, high-quality product structure and produce creative content." So you see, if individuals are professional in some aspects What is a necessary prerequisite for the ability of chemical production? It is necessary to have a UGC platform first.
With the platform, the content produced by a single individual cannot be compared with the effects of professional film and television, so what should we do? Skilled professionals can cooperate with outstanding individuals. This is the power of self-organization behind economic interests.
Not just videos, but in all fields of information, social, and business, if individuals can build scenarios collaboratively by themselves, the resulting efficiency will be more than 10 times that of centralized scenarios. How to understand? First of all, most centralized platforms play with your active rate and retention rate, such as social products. It is absolutely impossible to provide you with a stable relationship, because if you succeed in a one-time transaction, there will be no impact on the product. Value, you will not tax your relationship for a lifetime, so this product is essentially nonsense. It is misleading you and makes you think it is useful to you.
In fact, there is no long-term value at all.
And how many things behind e-commerce and consumerism really revolve around your needs? In today's era, the feedback path from demand to product development is not clear. You can think that it does not exist. The original method of production and marketing makes it impossible to meet the needs of small groups and individual needs. 90% of the cases are Through various top-down induction strategies, building a brand scene to attract you into a consumption trap, and make you feel confused in the material world. This is what this society does. People must see the social structure clearly. It is a capitalist society, which is embodied in that "all labor, all needs, and all productivity" are governed by capitalism, because the entire social scene is based on the capitalist mode of production.
Ma said in the 19th century that capitalism has been "greatly developed." Now, I used to think Ma’s judgment is a "joking." The centralized production method has advanced by leaps and bounds in the past 200 years, no matter in any industry. Obtained great development. This gives people the illusion that today's productivity is still not developed enough? There will be greater development in the future.
But now I want to change my perspective. I find that I haven't thought deeply about it. In terms of food, clothing, housing and transportation, if the role of technology is stripped away, is there any difference between the types and levels of services today and the past? I now feel that I have been misled for more than ten years. In fact, can the communist zy be established? Does it have anything to do with the development of productivity? Actually, it doesn't matter...
The establishment of communism depends on what it is, whether it can deepen the degree of connection between individuals, so that decentralized individuals have higher value output efficiency, and solve productivity improvements more objectively and rationally. And the problem of technological progress, and even help the capitalist structure to "improve vertical efficiency and eliminate the stubbornness and lack of openness." Even if the world after 10 years is decentralized, it allows individuals to form organizations, allowing individuals to gather into a centralized organization in a more efficient and open way. It will be eliminated and updated faster, and the entire chain will be more rapid. open.
When swarm intelligence replaces "screw" intelligence, productivity and technology will have greater development capabilities, and vertical and centralization will be more efficient and flexible, instead of being destroyed by decentralization.
So back to Ma, Ma did not overestimate the production level of capitalism at the time, but that the Internet had not yet been born in the era. He did not consider a true communist society, and it was not that the proletariat took over the enterprise (the bourgeois scene). What comes out is that the proletariat needs to have the ability to build scenes on its own and use new technology to feed back the old world.
And this ability requires the maturity of technologies such as "Internet and Internet of Things" (so that valuable social scenarios can be built from the bottom up), as well as various mature capabilities, such as immediacy, rich text transmission, and wire The ability to connect online and offline, etc., is given to the proletariat as a tool. In an era when there is no more efficient connection method, the proletariat has no way to defeat the bourgeoisie. The only way out for each proletariat is to be Forced to become a member of the bourgeoisie.
The difference between the bourgeois and proletarian scenes can be explained in one sentence: one is from top to bottom, the other is from bottom to top.
The bourgeoisie’s methodology for setting up scenarios is “from production, investment, and sales, which is a top-down process. You need to invest money and machinery in the early stage, and build a team, consider sales channels and methods, and then finely operate your own users. ", and legal persons bear all risks. The proletariat’s methodology for setting up scenarios is “from the bottom up to form a team, the market is more refined (small), more flexible, it can directly serve a small group of users, and provide a variety of services, and the risk is determined by Decentralized participants share equally."
Why the proletarian scene construction method is more efficient can be explained from the following points:
1. The refinement of the market-the plate is a hundred times bigger: The biggest misunderstanding of the thinking brought by the second industrial revolution to society is that people always think that the platform is large enough to fully occupy the entire market. But you consider the measurement of the coastline. If you are standing on an airplane and looking at the coastline and measuring 100 kilometers, when you go to the seaside to measure one foot by one foot, you can find that it can be infinitely long...even the coastline is from 1 The dimensions have become 1.5 dimensions, and the dimensions have changed tmd, so you don't even wake up.
If you are not so stupid, you should understand here that if you don’t want to go to a dead end, the only way is bottom-up measurement. We assume that the infinite coastline is alive, and every turning point is a living thing. At this time, let these living things measure by themselves, but just like microphysics, you are not sure which point is alive, and you are not sure how many points there are. It changes. Only by letting them decide for themselves who is in a straight line with whom can they measure a meaningful length. This is "coming from the masses and going to the masses". Isn’t it good to let the coastline determine its own length?
In this way, the "length" of the entire market is a hundred times longer than what you measured on an airplane.
2. The bigger the plate, the greater the capacity for wisdom: I didn’t think of a metaphor, so I used the simplest one. The more complex the neuron network, the higher the intelligence generated, and this intelligence is more exponential, just like people If your brain is three times bigger than a dog, you can’t be three times smarter than a dog. If you’re a little confident, people (though many people don’t use it) should be 1,000 times smarter than a dog. It’s not a problem. In fact, the more complex the neural network, The higher the intelligence generated, because the connection method is flexible, which is the group intelligence that humans are about to usher in.
In fact, all capital machines are also connected by "neurons", but if neurons are only connected vertically and stupidly, they will definitely not become humans. You can be an Alpha Dog, but this kind of artificial intelligence is not Compared with the overall intelligence of human beings, it is completely the difference between ants and dolphins.
The efficiency of today's "bourgeois method of setting up scenes" compared with the "methodology of building scenes of the proletariat" will also be the difference between the intelligence of ants and dolphins.
3. The more dispersed, flexible, and correct: If a group is not going to die on its own, then a decentralized ecology is difficult to destroy world peace like a foolish leader like Trump, and the power of the entire society will be Disintegration, first of all, there is no need for the trust endorsement of a third party. In a society where the Internet is fully developed, trust is closely related to everyone, and you can see it at a glance.
Connecting to a fully developed society, traditional banks will disintegrate, because in this underlying structure, crowdfunding has developed very mature, and there is no need for centralized institutions to create greater risks, and economic crises will never exist.
The traditional power structure will disintegrate. I have not actually thought about the state power organization, but the centralized power organization, haha, do you think it may not disintegrate? The functions will change greatly.
In short, it is a question: can the group be right? Why is everyone talking about "group stupidity", how did this stupidity arise, and will it lead to the destruction of the world?
We know that there is a herd effect in psychology, and people often get confused in their minds in order to gain status in a group, and their own thoughts and behaviors will produce blind actions. So this kind of stupidity, I actually think, is caused by insufficient social diversification, because the connection of people is too single, people's ideas are too single, and their status in contending with centralized routines is too unfair, which leads to Group stupidity.
Judging from the natural world, many group creatures cannot survive if they are separated from the group. I have never heard of anyone who has become stupid because of group living. When people live in groups, they will not regress.
I will not explain, I think this question is stupid.
We said that the more decentralized, the more flexible the problem, in fact, as mentioned above, the first of all, the dispersion is risk dispersion, and there will be no more economic crises. With decentralized power, idiots will no longer dominate the world. So flexibility refers to: it represents the interests of the group, directly facing supply and demand, research and development, rather than representing the interests of different classes and different interest groups.
I have explained from the low-level logic of efficiency, economic structure, and historical evolution, why society needs a "co-construction tool", and it also shows that it is the time when this tool was born. What I want to explain below is how to design this tool?
As mentioned above, such tools rely on the "Internet, Internet of Things" technology. This logic is essentially because pure virtual scenes are of little significance. Only the virtual can feed back the reality, just like all atoms are empty. But I, who is composed of atoms, live well. According to the "extension theory", reality and reality require conjugation, and it is a socially meaningful existence.
Therefore, when the proletariat uses the Internet to build a scene, this scene is by no means limited to online. Operations such as e-commerce orders may be virtualized. As for whether there will be any smart glasses to expand the experience in the future, I think this is all Not the core.
From an industry perspective, if the decentralized disintegration of industries such as "information, social networking, and e-commerce", what kind of modular functional basis should they have? The current information, social networking, and e-commerce are actually almost pure online, which has nothing to do with the Internet of Things. This is actually lacking, because the physical production capacity created by thousands of years of history is not combined with the virtual collaborative construction capacity. Getting up is equivalent to violating the heavens. The scene of human society should be constructed by individuals in collaboration. To change their living environment, to change the ecology of business, social interaction, and information.
I believe that the smart hardware in the future will reach a good cooperation with the collaboratively built products, which means that many collaboratively built organizations will be organically integrated with various hardware. Do you say it makes sense to change this exaggerated world to another exaggerated way? In fact, because the scene can create value and guide the output of value, then the exaggeration of this scene is meaningful.
For product design, in fact, the first thing to do is to break up the product structure. You need to build a decentralized (but not blockchain) product structure. The solution is not the issue of trust, but the organization between modules. And every day, hundreds of millions of small "primitives" are decentralized to generate connection and disconnection capabilities, and all "primitives" are linked to personal credit systems.
The second is that these primitives themselves must have functions. If you want to build information, social, and payment functions, you need to have basic rich text editing capabilities and multiple ways to connect. You also need to pay attention to the visualization of multiple primitives. The question is, if this social organization must have a structure, the structure of this organization must be designed and combined with the basic primitives.
Let me talk so much first, tired.
As for how this decentralized product will continue to develop, how it will develop with the advancement of 3D printing and the Internet of Things, I don’t see it now. It depends on the significance of the development of science and technology for human development. The efficiency of the group and the wisdom produced are predictable.
I can predict several futures now.
1. Human beings will gradually get rid of the limitation of life span, and even in the future will get rid of the limitation of the energy of basic physical particles, and realize interstellar crossing;
2. Human beings will improve their intelligence and expand their memory and logic abilities through brain-computer interfaces;
3. As for artificial intelligence, over-smartness is actually a terrible thing, and the tempering from stupid to smart is a more terrifying thing than terrible, because the result is intelligence, but this process is relatively stupid. The history of mankind shows that society does not need to be smart, it needs to be just rightly stupid. If the foolishness is not right, or is too smart, how can this social structure take over you? You created a god, then you must define this god well before he is born. The meaning of, even humans, has been defined by Sartre.
————————————————
Copyright Statement: This article is the original article of the CSDN blogger "WeChat Extension Primitives". It follows the CC 4.0 BY-SA copyright agreement. Please attach the original source link for reprinting. And this statement.
Original link: https://blog.csdn.net/weixin_46216698/article/details/107589509