One, the underlying logic
Chen Caigen said that the primary market is poor. Talking about the secondary market is tantamount to fraud. We know economics and we know that this is actually an unquestionable fact.
In other words, the secondary market relies on the primary market with real value. If finance is to be decentralized, then the primary market must first be decentralized, with the secondary market as the superstructure.
The essence of the primary market is the decentralized autonomous organization's control of the ownership of the scene. The scene itself can create value and possess value. In this sentence, we can extend the thinking:
So our common goal is actually:
How to make the scene create value?
Systematically consider the underlying issues, ask a question, and give my views on these underlying issues:
Question 1. Does the blockchain have to be linked to centralized institutions?
Yes, because the blockchain is just a tool, it must rely on valuable scenarios, and the value of the scenario is the core of the core. For example, Bitcoin is actually a centralized financial scenario. If it is not linked to currency speculation, it is impossible to create such a large capital market. So many people have discovered that the blockchain technology is decentralized, but the scene is centralized.
The AntChain also provides energy for the industry and for the current centralized scene. Whether the blockchain can achieve decentralization, in fact, the core is "whether it can rely on the decentralization scenario" . This is our consensus.