让我们先来看一段代码:
fn main() {
let s1 = gives_ownership();
let s2 = String::from("hello");
let s3 = takes_and_gives_back(s1);
println!("{}", s1);
println!("{}", s2);
println!("{}", s3);
}
fn gives_ownership() -> String {
let some_string = String::from("hello");
return some_string;
}
fn takes_and_gives_back(a_string: String) -> String {
a_string
}
此时println!("{}", s1);报错:borrow of moved value: `s1`
因为let s3 = takes_and_gives_back(s1);这句已经转移了s1的所有权,此时的s1已经名存实亡。
再来看下面代码:
fn main() {
let s1 = gives_ownership();
let s2 = String::from("hello");
let s3 = takes_and_gives_back(s2);
println!("{}", s1);
println!("{}", s2);
println!("{}", s3);
}
fn gives_ownership() -> String {
let some_string = String::from("hello");
return some_string;
}
fn takes_and_gives_back(a_string: String) -> String {
a_string
}
println!("{}", s2); 同样报错error[E0382]: borrow of moved value: `s2`
这说明了:let s2 = String::from("hello");与
fn gives_ownership() -> String {
let some_string = String::from("hello");
return some_string;}
实质上是等价的。
想要被转移的变量不失效可以使用clone,看如下代码
fn main() {
let s1 = gives_ownership();
let s2 = String::from("hello");
let s3 = takes_and_gives_back(s2.clone());
println!("{}", s1);
println!("{}", s2);
println!("{}", s3);
}
fn gives_ownership() -> String {
let some_string = String::from("hello");
return some_string;
}
fn takes_and_gives_back(a_string: String) -> String {
a_string
}
或者使用&运算符
fn main() {
let s1 = gives_ownership();
let s2 = String::from("hello");
let s3 = takes_and_gives_back(&s2);
println!("{}", s1);
println!("{}", s2);
println!("{}", s3);
}
fn gives_ownership() -> String {
let some_string = String::from("hello");
return some_string;
}
fn takes_and_gives_back(a_string: &String) -> &String {
a_string
}
那变量的转移 是在什么时候发生的呢?
fn main() {
let s1 = gives_ownership();
let s2 = String::from("hello");
println!("{}", s2);
let s3 = takes_and_gives_back(s2);
println!("{}", s1);
println!("{}", s3);
}
fn gives_ownership() -> String {
let some_string = String::from("hello");
return some_string;
}
fn takes_and_gives_back(a_string: String) -> String {
a_string
}
通过这段代码,我们发现println函数并不会转移变量所有权,所以变量的所有权是在被调用函数的return的时候被转移了。