1. 引言

Gabizon等人2019年论文《PLONK: permutations over lagrange-bases for oecumenical noninteractive arguments of knowledge》。

本文主要针对的代码库为：

https://github.com/dusk-network/plonk 【rust语言实现】

2. [kzg10] polynomial commitment scheme

主要见https://github.com/dusk-network/plonk/tree/master/src/commitment_scheme，采用的曲线为bls12-381。

BlsScalar：表示scalar field
G1Affine，G1Projective：表示group point，实际commitment采用G1Affine来表示，而借助.into()函数可将G1Projective转换为G1Affine形式。

identity是指无穷远点 $(0, 1, 1)$ 。满足任意点与该identity相加均为该点。

#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug, Eq, PartialEq)]
/// Holds a commitment to a polynomial in a form of a `G1Affine` Bls12_381 point.
pub struct Commitment(
    /// The commitment is a group element.
    pub G1Affine,
);

https://github.com/dusk-network/plonk代码库中，实际实现是参考了 Kate等人2010年论文[kzg10]《Polynomial Commitments∗》中不具有hiding属性的 3.2节“ $PolyCommit_{DL}$ ” 的属性，只是实际实现，采用的不是 symmetric pairing $e:\mathbb{G}\times\mathbb{G}\rightarrow\mathbb{G}_T$ ，而 unsymmetric pairing $e:\mathbb{G}_1\times \mathbb{G}_2\rightarrow \mathbb{G}_T$ 。

2.1 [kzg10] 单个多项式polynomial commitment

以degree 为 $t$ 的单个多项式 $\phi(x)\in\mathbb{Z}_p[x]$ 为例，构建polynomial commitment的数学背景为： $\frac{\phi(x)-\phi(z)}{x-z}$ 不存在余数 for $z\in\mathbb{Z}_p$ 。
$g$ 为generator of $\mathbb{G}_1$ ， $h$ 为generator of $\mathbb{G}_2$ 。

$Setup(t)\rightarrow pp$ ：输出的public parameters $p p$ 中包含 Prover用于生成proof的commit_key 和 Verifier用于verify的opening_key。
public parameters 又称为 structured reference string (srs)。
选择 $\beta\in_R\mathbb{Z_p}$ 为secret key $S K$ ，相应的：
commit_key为： $(g,g^{\beta},\cdots,g^{\beta^t})\in\mathbb{G}_1^{t+1}$ 【Prover使用】
opening_key为： $g\in\mathbb{G}_1,(h,h^{\beta})\in\mathbb{G}_2^2$ 【Verifier使用】

/// The Public Parameters can also be referred to as the Structured Reference String (SRS).
/// It is available to both the prover and verifier and allows the verifier to
/// efficiently verify and make claims about polynomials up to and including a configured degree.
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct PublicParameters {
    /// Key used to generate proofs for composed circuits.
    pub commit_key: CommitKey,
    /// Key used to verify proofs for composed circuits.
    pub opening_key: OpeningKey,
}

	/// Setup generates the public parameters using a random number generator.
    /// This method will in most cases be used for testing and exploration.
    /// In reality, a `Trusted party` or a `Multiparty Computation` will used to generate the SRS.
    /// Returns an error if the configured degree is less than one.
    pub fn setup<R: RngCore + CryptoRng>(
        max_degree: usize,
        mut rng: &mut R,
    ) -> Result<PublicParameters, Error> {
        // Cannot commit to constants
        if max_degree < 1 {
            return Err(Error::DegreeIsZero);
        }

        // Generate the secret scalar beta
        let beta = util::random_scalar(&mut rng);

        // Compute powers of beta up to and including beta^max_degree
        let powers_of_beta = util::powers_of(&beta, max_degree);

        // Powers of G1 that will be used to commit to a specified polynomial
        let g = util::random_g1_point(&mut rng);
        let powers_of_g: Vec<G1Projective> =
            util::slow_multiscalar_mul_single_base(&powers_of_beta, g);
        assert_eq!(powers_of_g.len(), max_degree + 1);

        // Normalise all projective points
        let mut normalised_g = vec![G1Affine::identity(); max_degree + 1];
        G1Projective::batch_normalize(&powers_of_g, &mut normalised_g);

        // Compute beta*G2 element and stored cached elements for verifying multiple proofs.
        let h: G2Affine = util::random_g2_point(&mut rng).into();
        let beta_h: G2Affine = (h * beta).into();

        Ok(PublicParameters {
            commit_key: CommitKey {
                powers_of_g: normalised_g,
            },
            opening_key: OpeningKey::new(g.into(), h, beta_h),
        })
    }

$commit_key , ϕ ( x ) ) → C Commit(\text{commit\_key},\phi(x))\rightarrow \mathcal{C}$ ：对多项式 $\phi(x)=\sum_{j=0}^{deg(\phi)}\phi_jx^j$ 进行commit，输出相应的commitment $\mathcal{C}=g^{\phi(\beta)}=\prod_{j=0}^{deg(\phi)}(g^{\beta^j})^{\phi_j}$ 。

	/// Commits to a polynomial returning the corresponding `Commitment`.
    ///
    /// Returns an error if the polynomial's degree is more than the max degree of the commit key.
    pub fn commit(&self, polynomial: &Polynomial) -> Result<Commitment, Error> {
        // Check whether we can safely commit to this polynomial
        self.check_commit_degree_is_within_bounds(polynomial.degree())?;

        // Compute commitment
        let commitment = msm_variable_base(&self.powers_of_g, &polynomial.coeffs);
        Ok(Commitment::from_projective(commitment))
    }

$commit_key , ϕ ( x ) , v , z ) → π Open\_single(\text{commit\_key},\phi(x), v, z)\rightarrow \pi$ ：即证明 $\phi(z)=v$ ，输出为opening proof $\pi$ 。
实际的witness为 $\psi(x)=\frac{\phi(x)-\phi(z)}{x-z}$ 对应的commitment $\pi=g^{\psi(\beta)}$ 。

	/// Creates an opening proof that a polynomial `p` was correctly evaluated at p(z) and produced the value
    /// `v`. ie v = p(z).
    /// Returns an error if the polynomials degree is too large.
    pub fn open_single(
        &self,
        polynomial: &Polynomial,
        value: &BlsScalar,
        point: &BlsScalar,
    ) -> Result<Proof, Error> {
        let witness_poly = self.compute_single_witness(polynomial, point);
        Ok(Proof {
            commitment_to_witness: self.commit(&witness_poly)?,
            evaluated_point: *value,
            commitment_to_polynomial: self.commit(polynomial)?,
        })
    }
	
	/// 这段注释有问题。。。。。。
	/// For a given polynomial `p` and a point `z`, compute the witness
    /// for p(z) using Ruffini's method for simplicity.
    /// The Witness is the quotient of f(x) - f(z) / x-z.
    /// However we note that the quotient polynomial is invariant under the value f(z)
    /// ie. only the remainder changes. We can therefore compute the witness as f(x) / x - z
    /// and only use the remainder term f(z) during verification.
    pub fn compute_single_witness(&self, polynomial: &Polynomial, point: &BlsScalar) -> Polynomial {
        // Computes `f(x) / x-z`, returning it as the witness poly
        polynomial.ruffini(*point)
    }

$opening_key , π , z , v , C ) → 0 or 1 VerifyEval\_single(\text{opening\_key},\pi,z,v,\mathcal{C})\rightarrow 0\text{ or } 1$ ：Verifier根据Prover提供的proof和之前对polynomial的commitment $\mathcal{C}$ 来确认相应的evaluation是否正确。
即仅需验证：
$e(\mathcal{C}-g^v, h)\cdot e(\pi,h^{(z-\beta)})=1$
是否成立即可。

	/// Checks that a polynomial `p` was evaluated at a point `z` and returned the value specified `v`.
    /// ie. v = p(z).
    pub fn check(&self, point: BlsScalar, proof: Proof) -> bool {
        let inner_a: G1Affine =
            (proof.commitment_to_polynomial.0 - (self.g * proof.evaluated_point)).into();

        let inner_b: G2Affine = (self.beta_h - (self.h * point)).into();
        let prepared_inner_b = G2Prepared::from(-inner_b);

        let pairing = dusk_bls12_381::multi_miller_loop(&[
            (&inner_a, &self.prepared_h),
            (&proof.commitment_to_witness.0, &prepared_inner_b),
        ])
        .final_exponentiation();

        pairing == dusk_bls12_381::Gt::identity()
    }

[kzg10]单个多项式 polynomial commitment scheme示例为：

	#[test]
    fn test_basic_commit() {
        let degree = 25;
        let (proving_key, opening_key) = setup_test(degree);
        let point = BlsScalar::from(10);

        let poly = Polynomial::rand(degree, &mut rand::thread_rng());
        let value = poly.evaluate(&point);

        let proof = proving_key.open_single(&poly, &value, &point).unwrap();

        let ok = opening_key.check(point, proof);
        assert!(ok);
    }

2.2 batch open different polynomials at same points

proof 个数为 $O (1)$ ，与points个数无关。
在这里插入图片描述

具体测试用例为：

	#[test]
    fn test_aggregate_witness() {
        let max_degree = 27;
        let (proving_key, opening_key) = setup_test(max_degree);
        let point = BlsScalar::from(10);

        // Committer's View
        let aggregated_proof = {
            // Compute secret polynomials and their evaluations
            let poly_a = Polynomial::rand(25, &mut rand::thread_rng());
            let poly_a_eval = poly_a.evaluate(&point);

            let poly_b = Polynomial::rand(26 + 1, &mut rand::thread_rng());
            let poly_b_eval = poly_b.evaluate(&point);

            let poly_c = Polynomial::rand(27, &mut rand::thread_rng());
            let poly_c_eval = poly_c.evaluate(&point);

            proving_key
                .open_multiple(
                    &[poly_a, poly_b, poly_c],
                    vec![poly_a_eval, poly_b_eval, poly_c_eval],
                    &point,
                    &mut Transcript::new(b"agg_flatten"),
                )
                .unwrap()
        };

        // Verifier's View
        let ok = {
            let flattened_proof = aggregated_proof.flatten(&mut Transcript::new(b"agg_flatten"));
            opening_key.check(point, flattened_proof)
        };

        assert!(ok);
    }

	/// Creates an opening proof that multiple polynomials were evaluated at the same point
    /// and that each evaluation produced the correct evaluation point.
    /// Returns an error if any of the polynomial's degrees are too large.
    pub fn open_multiple(
        &self,
        polynomials: &[Polynomial],
        evaluations: Vec<BlsScalar>,
        point: &BlsScalar,
        transcript: &mut Transcript,
    ) -> Result<AggregateProof, Error> {
        // Commit to polynomials
        let mut polynomial_commitments = Vec::with_capacity(polynomials.len());
        for poly in polynomials.iter() {
            polynomial_commitments.push(self.commit(poly)?)
        }

        // Compute the aggregate witness for polynomials
        let witness_poly = self.compute_aggregate_witness(polynomials, point, transcript);

        // Commit to witness polynomial
        let witness_commitment = self.commit(&witness_poly)?;

        let aggregate_proof = AggregateProof {
            commitment_to_witness: witness_commitment,
            evaluated_points: evaluations,
            commitments_to_polynomials: polynomial_commitments,
        };
        Ok(aggregate_proof)
    }

	/// Computes a single witness for multiple polynomials at the same point, by taking
    /// a random linear combination of the individual witnesses.
    /// We apply the same optimisation mentioned in when computing each witness; removing f(z).
    pub(crate) fn compute_aggregate_witness(
        &self,
        polynomials: &[Polynomial],
        point: &BlsScalar,
        transcript: &mut Transcript,
    ) -> Polynomial {
        let challenge = transcript.challenge_scalar(b"aggregate_witness");
        let powers = util::powers_of(&challenge, polynomials.len() - 1);

        assert_eq!(powers.len(), polynomials.len());

        let numerator: Polynomial = polynomials
            .iter()
            .zip(powers.iter())
            .map(|(poly, challenge)| poly * challenge)
            .sum();
        numerator.ruffini(*point)
    }

Verifier 进行 flatten的主要作用为：

获取相同的随机值 $\gamma$ ，计算 $(1,\gamma,\cdots,\gamma^{t-1})$ 。
flattened_poly_commitments 对应为 $F$ ，flattened_poly_evaluations对应为 $v$ 。

	/// Flattens an `AggregateProof` into a `Proof`.
    /// The transcript must have the same view as the transcript that was used to aggregate the witness in the proving stage.
    pub fn flatten(&self, transcript: &mut Transcript) -> Proof {
        let challenge = transcript.challenge_scalar(b"aggregate_witness");
        let powers = powers_of(&challenge, self.commitments_to_polynomials.len() - 1);

        // Flattened polynomial commitments using challenge
        let flattened_poly_commitments: G1Projective = self
            .commitments_to_polynomials
            .iter()
            .zip(powers.iter())
            .map(|(poly, challenge)| poly.0 * challenge)
            .sum();
        // Flattened evaluation points
        let flattened_poly_evaluations: BlsScalar = self
            .evaluated_points
            .iter()
            .zip(powers.iter())
            .map(|(eval, challenge)| eval * challenge)
            .fold(BlsScalar::zero(), |acc, current_val| acc + current_val);

        Proof {
            commitment_to_witness: self.commitment_to_witness,
            evaluated_point: flattened_poly_evaluations,
            commitment_to_polynomial: Commitment::from_projective(flattened_poly_commitments),
        }
    }

2.3 batch open different polynomials at different points

2.3.1 当proof 个数与points个数一致时

当proof 个数与points个数一致时，即为每个point的evaluation生成一个proof，对应示例为：

	#[test]
    fn test_batch_verification() {
        let degree = 25;
        let (proving_key, vk) = setup_test(degree);

        let point_a = BlsScalar::from(10);
        let point_b = BlsScalar::from(11);

        // Compute secret polynomial a
        let poly_a = Polynomial::rand(degree, &mut rand::thread_rng());
        let value_a = poly_a.evaluate(&point_a);
        let proof_a = proving_key
            .open_single(&poly_a, &value_a, &point_a)
            .unwrap();
        assert!(vk.check(point_a, proof_a));

        // Compute secret polynomial b
        let poly_b = Polynomial::rand(degree, &mut rand::thread_rng());
        let value_b = poly_b.evaluate(&point_b);
        let proof_b = proving_key
            .open_single(&poly_b, &value_b, &point_b)
            .unwrap();
        assert!(vk.check(point_b, proof_b));

        assert!(vk
            .batch_check(
                &[point_a, point_b],
                &[proof_a, proof_b],
                &mut Transcript::new(b""),
            )
            .is_ok());
    }

相应batch算法实现为：

$opening_key , π 1 , ⋯ , π n , z 1 , ⋯ , z n , v 1 . ⋯ , v n , C 1 , ⋯ , C n ) → 0 or 1 VerifyEval\_batch(\text{opening\_key},\pi_1,\cdots,\pi_n,z_1,\cdots,z_n,v_1.\cdots,v_n,\mathcal{C}_1,\cdots,\mathcal{C}_n)\rightarrow 0\text{ or } 1$ ：Verifier根据Prover提供的proofs $\pi_1,\cdots,\pi_n$ 和之前对polynomials $f_1,\cdots,f_n$ 的commitments $\mathcal{C}_1,\cdots,\mathcal{C}_n$ 来确认相应的evaluations $v_1=f_1(z_1),\cdots,v_n=f_n(z_n)$ 是否正确。
Verifier选择随机值 $\gamma$ ，并计算 $(1,\gamma,\cdots,\gamma^{n-1})$ 。
计算：
$\mathcal{C}_{sum}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\gamma^{i-1}(\mathcal{C}_{i}+\pi_{i}\cdot z_i)-\sum_{i=1}^n\gamma^{i-1}v_i=\sum_{i=1}^n\gamma^{i-1}\frac{\beta(f_i(\beta)-f_i(z_i))}{\beta-z_i}$
$\pi_{sum}=-\sum_{i=1}^{n}\gamma^{i-1}\pi_i=-\sum_{i=1}^{n}\gamma^{i-1}\frac{f_i(\beta)-f_i(z_i)}{\beta-z_i}$
即仅需验证：
$e(\mathcal{C}_{sum}, h)\cdot e(\pi_{sum},h^{\beta})=1$
是否成立即可。

	/// Checks whether a batch of polynomials evaluated at different points, returned their specified value.
    pub fn batch_check(
        &self,
        points: &[BlsScalar],
        proofs: &[Proof],
        transcript: &mut Transcript,
    ) -> Result<(), Error> {
        let mut total_c = G1Projective::identity();
        let mut total_w = G1Projective::identity();

        let challenge = transcript.challenge_scalar(b"batch"); // XXX: Verifier can add their own randomness at this point
        let powers = util::powers_of(&challenge, proofs.len() - 1);
        // Instead of multiplying g and gamma_g in each turn, we simply accumulate
        // their coefficients and perform a final multiplication at the end.
        let mut g_multiplier = BlsScalar::zero();

        for ((proof, challenge), point) in proofs.iter().zip(powers).zip(points) {
            let mut c = G1Projective::from(proof.commitment_to_polynomial.0);
            let w = proof.commitment_to_witness.0;
            c += w * point;
            g_multiplier += challenge * proof.evaluated_point;

            total_c += c * challenge;
            total_w += w * challenge;
        }
        total_c -= self.g * g_multiplier;

        let affine_total_w = G1Affine::from(-total_w);
        let affine_total_c = G1Affine::from(total_c);

        let pairing = dusk_bls12_381::multi_miller_loop(&[
            (&affine_total_w, &self.prepared_beta_h),
            (&affine_total_c, &self.prepared_h),
        ])
        .final_exponentiation();

        if pairing != dusk_bls12_381::Gt::identity() {
            return Err(Error::PairingCheckFailure);
        };
        Ok(())
    }

实际，Plonk中针对的场景为，evaluation points中实际仅有2组不同，分别表示为 $z, z^{'}$ ，具体示例为：【即proof 个数与不同的points个数一致】

	#[test]
    fn test_batch_with_aggregation() {
        let max_degree = 28;
        let (proving_key, opening_key) = setup_test(max_degree);
        let point_a = BlsScalar::from(10);
        let point_b = BlsScalar::from(11);

        // Committer's View
        let (aggregated_proof, single_proof) = {
            // Compute secret polynomial and their evaluations
            let poly_a = Polynomial::rand(25, &mut rand::thread_rng());
            let poly_a_eval = poly_a.evaluate(&point_a);

            let poly_b = Polynomial::rand(26, &mut rand::thread_rng());
            let poly_b_eval = poly_b.evaluate(&point_a);

            let poly_c = Polynomial::rand(27, &mut rand::thread_rng());
            let poly_c_eval = poly_c.evaluate(&point_a);

            let poly_d = Polynomial::rand(28, &mut rand::thread_rng());
            let poly_d_eval = poly_d.evaluate(&point_b);

            let aggregated_proof = proving_key
                .open_multiple(
                    &[poly_a, poly_b, poly_c],
                    vec![poly_a_eval, poly_b_eval, poly_c_eval],
                    &point_a,
                    &mut Transcript::new(b"agg_batch"),
                )
                .unwrap();

            let single_proof = proving_key
                .open_single(&poly_d, &poly_d_eval, &point_b)
                .unwrap();

            (aggregated_proof, single_proof)
        };

        // Verifier's View
        let ok = {
            let mut transcript = Transcript::new(b"agg_batch");
            let flattened_proof = aggregated_proof.flatten(&mut transcript);

            opening_key.batch_check(
                &[point_a, point_b],
                &[flattened_proof, single_proof],
                &mut transcript,
            )
        };

        assert!(ok.is_ok());
    }

3. 借助(I)FFT来加速多项式乘法运算

3.1 (I)FFT加速多项式乘法运算

(I)FFT 仅适于 multiplicative subgroup of size that is a power-of-2。
具体代码见https://github.com/3for/plonk/blob/master/src/fft/ 目录：

/// Performs O(nlogn) multiplication of polynomials if F is smooth.
impl<'a, 'b> Mul<&'a Polynomial> for &'b Polynomial {
    type Output = Polynomial;

    #[inline]
    fn mul(self, other: &'a Polynomial) -> Polynomial {
        if self.is_zero() || other.is_zero() {
            Polynomial::zero()
        } else {
            let domain = EvaluationDomain::new(self.coeffs.len() + other.coeffs.len())
                .expect("field is not smooth enough to construct domain");
            let mut self_evals = Evaluations::from_vec_and_domain(domain.fft(&self.coeffs), domain);
            let other_evals = Evaluations::from_vec_and_domain(domain.fft(&other.coeffs), domain);
            self_evals *= &other_evals;
            self_evals.interpolate()
        }
    }
}

/// Defines a domain over which finite field (I)FFTs can be performed. Works
/// only for fields that have a large multiplicative subgroup of size that is
/// a power-of-2.
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Eq, PartialEq)]
pub struct EvaluationDomain {
    /// The size of the domain.
    pub size: u64,
    /// `log_2(self.size)`.
    pub log_size_of_group: u32,
    /// Size of the domain as a field element.
    pub size_as_field_element: BlsScalar,
    /// Inverse of the size in the field.
    pub size_inv: BlsScalar,
    /// A generator of the subgroup.
    pub group_gen: BlsScalar,
    /// Inverse of the generator of the subgroup.
    pub group_gen_inv: BlsScalar,
    /// Multiplicative generator of the finite field.
    pub generator_inv: BlsScalar,
}

3.2 coset FFT

假设order为 $p$ 的有限域内，相应的generator为 $g$ ，有 $g^{p-1}\equiv 1\mod p$ 。
以domain_n $n = 8$ 为例，假设有 $w^8\equiv 1\mod p$ 。
则相应的domain_4n 中有， $v^{32}\equiv 1\mod p$ 。

let q_m_eval_4n =
            Evaluations::from_vec_and_domain(domain_4n.coset_fft(&selectors.q_m), domain_4n);

其中domain_n的q_m多项式：

以系数表示为 $c_0,c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4,c_5,c_6,c_7)$ ；
以点值表示为 $((1,qm_0), (w,qm_1),(w^2,qm_2),\cdots,(w^7,qm_7))$

coset_fft()函数是将系数扩充至domain_4n，多项式q_m_4n：

以系数表示为 $(c_0,c_1g,c_2g^2,c_3g^3,c_4g^4,c_5g^5,c_6g^6,c_7g^7,0,\cdots,0)$ 【总长度为8*4=32】
以点值表示为 $((1,qm4n_0),(v,qm4n_1),\cdots,(v^{31},qm4n_{31}))$ 。【代码中q_m_eval_4n即为相应的点值表示。】

// Compute 4n evaluations for X^n -1
v_h_coset_4n: domain_4n.compute_vanishing_poly_over_coset(domain.size() as u64),

compute_vanishing_poly_over_coset()中的 evaluations v_h 为：
$\begin{bmatrix} g^8-1 & g^8v^8-1 & g^8v^{16}-1 & g^8v^{24}-1\\ g^8-1 & g^8v^8-1 & g^8v^{16}-1 & g^8v^{24}-1\\ g^8-1 & g^8v^8-1 & g^8v^{16}-1 & g^8v^{24}-1\\ g^8-1 & g^8v^8-1 & g^8v^{16}-1 & g^8v^{24}-1\\ g^8-1 & g^8v^8-1 & g^8v^{16}-1 & g^8v^{24}-1\\ g^8-1 & g^8v^8-1 & g^8v^{16}-1 & g^8v^{24}-1\\ g^8-1 & g^8v^8-1 & g^8v^{16}-1 & g^8v^{24}-1\\ g^8-1 & g^8v^8-1 & g^8v^{16}-1 & g^8v^{24}-1 \end{bmatrix}$

相应的插值点为：
$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & v & v^2 & v^3\\ v^4 & v^5 & v^6 & v^7\\ v^8 & v^9 & v^{10} & v^{11}\\ v^{12} & v^{13} & v^{14} & v^{15}\\ v^{16} & v^{17} & v^{18} & v^{19}\\ v^{20} & v^{21} & v^{22} & v^{23}\\ v^{24} & v^{25} & v^{26} & v^{27}\\ v^{28} & v^{29} & v^{30} & v^{31} \end{bmatrix}$

4. permutation argument

具体代码实现见：https://github.com/3for/plonk/blob/master/src/permutation/permutation.rs。

粒度在Variable（以此为键值），每个变量可为多个门的左侧输入、右侧输入、输出或者是Fourth值，这些信息维护在相应的Vec<WireData>中。

/// Permutation provides the necessary state information and functions
/// to create the permutation polynomial. In the literature, Z(X) is the "accumulator",
/// this is what this codebase calls the permutation polynomial.  
#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct Permutation {
    // Maps a variable to the wires that it is associated to
    pub(crate) variable_map: HashMap<Variable, Vec<WireData>>,
}

/// The value is a reference to the actual value that was added to the constraint system
#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Clone, Copy, Hash)]
pub struct Variable(pub(crate) usize);

impl Into<(BlsScalar, Variable)> for Variable {
    fn into(self) -> (BlsScalar, Variable) {
        (BlsScalar::one(), self)
    }
}

/// Stores the data for a specific wire in an arithmetic circuit
/// This data is the gate index and the type of wire
/// Left(1) signifies that this wire belongs to the first gate and is the left wire
#[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
pub enum WireData {
    /// Left Wire of n'th gate
    Left(usize),
    /// Right Wire of n'th gate
    Right(usize),
    /// Output Wire of n'th gate
    Output(usize),
    /// Fourth Wire of n'th gate
    Fourth(usize),
}

假设总共有 $n$ 个gate，令 $\omega$ 为 $n$ -th root of unity，即在scalar 域内，满足 $\omega^n=1$ 。
令 $H=\{1,\omega,\cdots,\omega^{n-1}\}$ ，取 $k_1,k_2,k_3\in\mathbb{F}$ ，满足 $H,k_1\cdot H,k_2\cdot H, k_3\cdot H$ 为distinct cosets of $H$ in $\mathbb{F}^*$ 。

/// Constants used in the permutation argument to ensure that the wire subsets are disjoint.
pub(crate) const K1: BlsScalar = BlsScalar::from_raw([7, 0, 0, 0]);
pub(crate) const K2: BlsScalar = BlsScalar::from_raw([13, 0, 0, 0]);
pub(crate) const K3: BlsScalar = BlsScalar::from_raw([17, 0, 0, 0]);

以 $n = 4$ 为例，具体见test_permutation_compute_sigmas_only_left_wires，采用lagrange插值，插值点为 $(1,\omega,\cdots,\omega^3)$ ，使得：

对于Left wire有： $L_0=L(1)=1,L_1=L(\omega)=\omega,L_2=L(\omega^2)=\omega^2,L_3=L(\omega^3)=\omega^3$ 。
对于Right wire有： $R_0=R(1)=K_1,R_1=R(\omega)=K_1\omega,R_2=R(\omega^2)=K_1\omega^2,R_3=R(\omega^3)=K_1\omega^3$ 。
对于Output wire有： $O_0=O(1)=K_2,O_1=O(\omega)=K_2\omega,O_2=O(\omega^2)=K_2\omega^2,O_3=O(\omega^3)=K_2\omega^3$ 。
对于Fourth wire有： $F_0=F(1)=K_3,F_1=F(\omega)=K_3\omega,F_2=F(\omega^2)=K_3\omega^2,F_3=F(\omega^3)=K_3\omega^3$ 。

permutation是根据实际各个wire与Variable之间的逻辑关系，进行了调整后再插值：

		let num_wire_mappings = 4;
		// ！此处即为实际各个wire与Variable之间的逻辑关系！
        // Add four wire mappings
        perm.add_variables_to_map(var_zero, var_zero, var_five, var_nine, 0);
        perm.add_variables_to_map(var_zero, var_two, var_six, var_nine, 1);
        perm.add_variables_to_map(var_zero, var_three, var_seven, var_nine, 2);
        perm.add_variables_to_map(var_zero, var_four, var_eight, var_nine, 3);

        /*
        var_zero = {L0, R0, L1, L2, L3}
        var_two = {R1}
        var_three = {R2}
        var_four = {R3}
        var_five = {O0}
        var_six = {O1}
        var_seven = {O2}
        var_eight = {O3}
        var_nine = {F0, F1, F2, F3}
        Left_sigma = {R0, L2, L3, L0}
        Right_sigma = {L1, R1, R2, R3}
        Out_sigma = {O0, O1, O2, O3}
        Fourth_sigma = {F1, F2, F3, F0}
        */
        let sigmas = perm.compute_sigma_permutations(num_wire_mappings);
        let left_sigma = &sigmas[0];
        let right_sigma = &sigmas[1];
        let out_sigma = &sigmas[2];
        let fourth_sigma = &sigmas[3];

        // Check the left sigma polynomial
        assert_eq!(left_sigma[0], WireData::Right(0));
        assert_eq!(left_sigma[1], WireData::Left(2));
        assert_eq!(left_sigma[2], WireData::Left(3));
        assert_eq!(left_sigma[3], WireData::Left(0));

        // Check the right sigma polynomial
        assert_eq!(right_sigma[0], WireData::Left(1));
        assert_eq!(right_sigma[1], WireData::Right(1));
        assert_eq!(right_sigma[2], WireData::Right(2));
        assert_eq!(right_sigma[3], WireData::Right(3));

        // Check the output sigma polynomial
        assert_eq!(out_sigma[0], WireData::Output(0));
        assert_eq!(out_sigma[1], WireData::Output(1));
        assert_eq!(out_sigma[2], WireData::Output(2));
        assert_eq!(out_sigma[3], WireData::Output(3));

        // Check the output sigma polynomial
        assert_eq!(fourth_sigma[0], WireData::Fourth(1));
        assert_eq!(fourth_sigma[1], WireData::Fourth(2));
        assert_eq!(fourth_sigma[2], WireData::Fourth(3));
        assert_eq!(fourth_sigma[3], WireData::Fourth(0));

        let domain = EvaluationDomain::new(num_wire_mappings).unwrap();
        let w: Fr = domain.group_gen;
        let w_squared = w.pow(&[2, 0, 0, 0]);
        let w_cubed = w.pow(&[3, 0, 0, 0]);

        // Check the left sigmas have been encoded properly
        // Left_sigma = {R0, L2, L3, L0}
        // Should turn into {1 * K1, w^2, w^3, 1}
        let encoded_left_sigma = perm.compute_permutation_lagrange(left_sigma, &domain);
        assert_eq!(encoded_left_sigma[0], Fr::one() * &K1);
        assert_eq!(encoded_left_sigma[1], w_squared);
        assert_eq!(encoded_left_sigma[2], w_cubed);
        assert_eq!(encoded_left_sigma[3], Fr::one());

        // Check the right sigmas have been encoded properly
        // Right_sigma = {L1, R1, R2, R3}
        // Should turn into {w, w * K1, w^2 * K1, w^3 * K1}
        let encoded_right_sigma = perm.compute_permutation_lagrange(right_sigma, &domain);
        assert_eq!(encoded_right_sigma[0], w);
        assert_eq!(encoded_right_sigma[1], w * &K1);
        assert_eq!(encoded_right_sigma[2], w_squared * &K1);
        assert_eq!(encoded_right_sigma[3], w_cubed * &K1);

        // Check the output sigmas have been encoded properly
        // Out_sigma = {O0, O1, O2, O3}
        // Should turn into {1 * K2, w * K2, w^2 * K2, w^3 * K2}
        let encoded_output_sigma = perm.compute_permutation_lagrange(out_sigma, &domain);
        assert_eq!(encoded_output_sigma[0], Fr::one() * &K2);
        assert_eq!(encoded_output_sigma[1], w * &K2);
        assert_eq!(encoded_output_sigma[2], w_squared * &K2);
        assert_eq!(encoded_output_sigma[3], w_cubed * &K2);

        // Check the fourth sigmas have been encoded properly
        // Out_sigma = {F1, F2, F3, F0}
        // Should turn into {w * K3, w^2 * K3, w^3 * K3, 1 * K3}
        let encoded_fourth_sigma = perm.compute_permutation_lagrange(fourth_sigma, &domain);
        assert_eq!(encoded_fourth_sigma[0], w * &K3);
        assert_eq!(encoded_fourth_sigma[1], w_squared * &K3);
        assert_eq!(encoded_fourth_sigma[2], w_cubed * &K3);
        assert_eq!(encoded_fourth_sigma[3], K3);

	fn compute_permutation_lagrange(
        &self,
        sigma_mapping: &[WireData],
        domain: &EvaluationDomain,
    ) -> Vec<BlsScalar> {
        let roots: Vec<_> = domain.elements().collect();

        let lagrange_poly: Vec<BlsScalar> = sigma_mapping
            .iter()
            .map(|x| match x {
                WireData::Left(index) => {
                    let root = &roots[*index];
                    *root
                }
                WireData::Right(index) => {
                    let root = &roots[*index];
                    K1 * root
                }
                WireData::Output(index) => {
                    let root = &roots[*index];
                    K2 * root
                }
                WireData::Fourth(index) => {
                    let root = &roots[*index];
                    K3 * root
                }
            })
            .collect();

        lagrange_poly
    }

test_correct_permutation_poly中：【仍然以 $n = 4$ 为例， $\omega^4=1$ 】

numerator_components为： $n_0,n_1,n_2,n_3)$
denominator_components为： $d_0,d_1,d_2,d_3)$
根据permutation，有： $\frac{n_0n_1n_2n_3}{d_0d_1d_2d_3}=1$ 。
z_vec为： $(1,\frac{n_0}{d_0},\frac{n_0n_1}{d_0d_1},\frac{n_0n_1n_2}{d_0d_1d_2})$
z_poly多项式的点值表示为： $((1,1),(\omega,\frac{n_0}{d_0}),(\omega^2,\frac{n_0n_1}{d_0d_1}),(\omega^3,\frac{n_0n_1n_2}{d_0d_1d_2}))=((1,Z(1)),(\omega,Z(\omega)),(\omega^2,Z(\omega^2)),(\omega^3,Z(\omega^3)))$ 。【compute_permutation_poly() 函数实际计算的即为z_poly多项式。】
从而有 $\frac{Z(\omega^i)}{Z(\omega^{i+1})}=\frac{d_i}{n_i}$ ，for $1\leq i<n$ 。
shifted_z为： $(\frac{n_0}{d_0},\frac{n_0n_1}{d_0d_1},\frac{n_0n_1n_2}{d_0d_1d_2},1)$
shifted_z_poly多项式的点值表示为： $((1,\frac{n_0}{d_0}),(\omega,\frac{n_0n_1}{d_0d_1}),(\omega^2,\frac{n_0n_1n_2}{d_0d_1d_2}),(\omega^3,1))=((1,Z_S(1)),(\omega,Z_S(\omega)),(\omega^2,Z_S(\omega^2)),(\omega^3,Z_S(\omega^3)))$
从而有 $Z_S(\omega^i)=Z(\omega^{i+1})$ ，for $0\leq i < n$ 。

5. constraint system

plonk论文中列出的是：
fan-in 2 + 只有加法和乘法门的circuit。

而在dusk-network的plonk代码实现中，扩展为了：

//! It allows us not only to build Add and Mul constraints but also to build
//! ECC op. gates, Range checks, Logical gates (Bitwise ops) etc.

因此：

除 left wire、right wire、output wire之外，还引入了fourth wire；【对于仅有3根wire的gate，可将fourth wire设置为 zero_var: Variable(0)。】
除 $\vec{q}_L,\vec{q}_R,\vec{q}_O,\vec{q}_M,\vec{q}_C\in\mathbb{F}^n$ selector vector之外，还引入了 $\vec{q}_4, \vec{q}_{arith},\vec{q}_{range},\vec{q}_{logic},\vec{q}_{fixed\_group\_add},\vec{q}_{variable\_group\_add}$ 。【对于mul gate， $q_l,q_r$ 恒为0；对于add gate， $q_m$ 恒为0。】
相应的constraint计算公式需满足 k==0：

			let k = qarith * ((qm * a * b) + (ql * a) + (qr * b) + (qo * c) + (q4 * d) + pi + qc)
                + qlogic
                    * (((delta(a_next - four * a) - delta(b_next - four * b)) * c)
                        + delta(a_next - four * a)
                        + delta(b_next - four * b)
                        + delta(d_next - four * d)
                        + match (qlogic == BlsScalar::one(), qlogic == -BlsScalar::one()) {
                            (true, false) => (a & b) - d,
                            (false, true) => (a ^ b) - d,
                            (false, false) => BlsScalar::zero(),
                            _ => unreachable!(),
                        })
                + qrange
                    * (delta(c - four * d)
                        + delta(b - four * c)
                        + delta(a - four * b)
                        + delta(d_next - four * a));

            assert_eq!(k, BlsScalar::zero(), "Check failed at gate {}", i,);

其中delta函数用于保证f值仅为0 或 1 或 2 或 3，使得最终delta函数的输出为0值：【原因在于logic_gate中是同时对两个bit进行and或xor操作。与ebfull/halo中的xor方案不同，ebfull中是对单个bit进行and或xor操作。】

		// Computes f(f-1)(f-2)(f-3)
        let delta = |f: BlsScalar| -> BlsScalar {
            let f_1 = f - BlsScalar::one();
            let f_2 = f - BlsScalar::from(2);
            let f_3 = f - BlsScalar::from(3);
            f * f_1 * f_2 * f_3
        };

具体的结构体设计为：

/// A composer is a circuit builder
/// and will dictate how a circuit is built
/// We will have a default Composer called `StandardComposer`
#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct StandardComposer {
    // n represents the number of arithmetic gates in the circuit
    pub(crate) n: usize,

    // Selector vectors
    //
    // Multiplier selector
    pub(crate) q_m: Vec<BlsScalar>,
    // Left wire selector
    pub(crate) q_l: Vec<BlsScalar>,
    // Right wire selector
    pub(crate) q_r: Vec<BlsScalar>,
    // Output wire selector
    pub(crate) q_o: Vec<BlsScalar>,
    // Fourth wire selector
    pub(crate) q_4: Vec<BlsScalar>,
    // Constant wire selector
    pub(crate) q_c: Vec<BlsScalar>,
    // Arithmetic wire selector
    pub(crate) q_arith: Vec<BlsScalar>,
    // Range selector
    pub(crate) q_range: Vec<BlsScalar>,
    // Logic selector
    pub(crate) q_logic: Vec<BlsScalar>,
    // Fixed base group addition selector
    pub(crate) q_fixed_group_add: Vec<BlsScalar>,
    // Variable base group addition selector
    pub(crate) q_variable_group_add: Vec<BlsScalar>,

    /// Public inputs vector
    pub public_inputs: Vec<BlsScalar>,

    // Witness vectors
    pub(crate) w_l: Vec<Variable>,
    pub(crate) w_r: Vec<Variable>,
    pub(crate) w_o: Vec<Variable>,
    pub(crate) w_4: Vec<Variable>,

    /// A zero variable that is a part of the circuit description.
    /// We reserve a variable to be zero in the system
    /// This is so that when a gate only uses three wires, we set the fourth wire to be
    /// the variable that references zero
    pub(crate) zero_var: Variable,

    // These are the actual variable values
    // N.B. They should not be exposed to the end user once added into the composer
    pub(crate) variables: HashMap<Variable, BlsScalar>,

    pub(crate) perm: Permutation,
}

对于常规的3-wire门，表示为：【其中 $p i$ 表示 public inputs。】

	/// Adds a width-3 poly gate.
    /// This gate gives total freedom to the end user to implement the corresponding
    /// circuits in the most optimized way possible because the under has access to the
    /// whole set of variables, as well as selector coefficients that take part in the
    /// computation of the gate equation.
    ///
    /// The final constraint added will force the following:
    /// `(a * b) * q_m + a * q_l + b * q_r + q_c + PI + q_o * c = 0`.
    pub fn poly_gate(
        &mut self,
        a: Variable,
        b: Variable,
        c: Variable,
        q_m: BlsScalar,
        q_l: BlsScalar,
        q_r: BlsScalar,
        q_o: BlsScalar,
        q_c: BlsScalar,
        pi: BlsScalar,
    ) -> (Variable, Variable, Variable) {
        self.w_l.push(a);
        self.w_r.push(b);
        self.w_o.push(c);
        self.w_4.push(self.zero_var);
        self.q_l.push(q_l);
        self.q_r.push(q_r);

        // Add selector vectors
        self.q_m.push(q_m);
        self.q_o.push(q_o);
        self.q_c.push(q_c);
        self.q_4.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_arith.push(BlsScalar::one());

        self.q_range.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_logic.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_fixed_group_add.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_variable_group_add.push(BlsScalar::zero());

        self.public_inputs.push(pi);

        self.perm
            .add_variables_to_map(a, b, c, self.zero_var, self.n);
        self.n += 1;

        (a, b, c)
    }

支持的constraint类型有：

1）constant constraint
2）equal constraint
3）dummy constraint
4）multiply constraint
5）add constraint
6）boolean constraint
7）fixed group add constraint
8）xor logic constraint
9）and logic constraint
10）range constraint

5.1 constant constraint

constant constraint：即某变量值等于某常数，如a变量满足 a - constant + pi = 0。

	/// Adds a gate which is designed to constrain a `Variable` to have
    /// a specific constant value which is sent as a `BlsScalar`.
    pub fn constrain_to_constant(&mut self, a: Variable, constant: BlsScalar, pi: BlsScalar) {
        self.poly_gate(
            a,
            a,
            a,
            BlsScalar::zero(),
            BlsScalar::one(),
            BlsScalar::zero(),
            BlsScalar::zero(),
            -constant,
            pi,
        );
    }

constant constraint可用于约束circuit中的某个point为某个特定的public point：【验证public info】

/// Represents a JubJub point in the circuit
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy)]
pub struct Point {
    x: Variable,
    y: Variable,
}
	/// Asserts that a point in the circuit is equal to a known public point
    pub fn assert_equal_public_point(
        &mut self,
        point: Point,
        public_point: dusk_jubjub::JubJubAffine,
    ) {
        self.constrain_to_constant(point.x, BlsScalar::zero(), -public_point.get_x());
        self.constrain_to_constant(point.y, BlsScalar::zero(), -public_point.get_y());
    }

5.2 equal constraint

equal constraint：即某两个变量相等，a = b。

	/// Asserts that two variables are the same
    // XXX: Instead of wasting a gate, we can use the permutation polynomial to do this
    pub fn assert_equal(&mut self, a: Variable, b: Variable) {
        self.poly_gate(
            a,
            b,
            self.zero_var,
            BlsScalar::zero(),
            BlsScalar::one(),
            -BlsScalar::one(),
            BlsScalar::zero(),
            BlsScalar::zero(),
            BlsScalar::zero(),
        );
    }

equal constraint可用于约束circuit中的某两个point是相等的：【验证private info】

	/// Asserts that a point in the circuit is equal to another point in the circuit
    pub fn assert_equal_point(&mut self, point_a: Point, point_b: Point) {
        self.assert_equal(point_a.x, point_b.x);
        self.assert_equal(point_b.y, point_b.y);
    }

5.3 dummy constraint

对于有 $n$ 个gate的circuit，其constraint数量为 $n + 3$ ，其中那3个为：

1）默认设置circuit的第一个变量值为0。

		// Reserve the first variable to be zero
        composer.zero_var = composer.add_witness_to_circuit_description(BlsScalar::zero());

2）为witness polynomials的blinding属性引入了2个dummy constraint—— 一个constraint用于保证selector polynomials不全为 zero polynomial；另一个constraint用于保证permutation polynomial不为identity polynomial。
目前是通过dummy constraint的方式来为witness polynomials添加blinding factor：

	/// This function is used to add a blinding factor to the witness polynomials
    /// XXX: Split this into two separate functions and document
    /// XXX: We could add another section to add random witness variables, with selector polynomials all zero
    pub fn add_dummy_constraints(&mut self) {
        // Add a dummy constraint so that we do not have zero polynomials
        self.q_m.push(BlsScalar::from(1));
        self.q_l.push(BlsScalar::from(2));
        self.q_r.push(BlsScalar::from(3));
        self.q_o.push(BlsScalar::from(4));
        self.q_c.push(BlsScalar::from(4));
        self.q_4.push(BlsScalar::one());
        self.q_arith.push(BlsScalar::one());
        self.q_range.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_logic.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_fixed_group_add.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_variable_group_add.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.public_inputs.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        let var_six = self.add_input(BlsScalar::from(6));
        let var_one = self.add_input(BlsScalar::from(1));
        let var_seven = self.add_input(BlsScalar::from(7));
        let var_min_twenty = self.add_input(-BlsScalar::from(20));
        self.w_l.push(var_six);
        self.w_r.push(var_seven);
        self.w_o.push(var_min_twenty);
        self.w_4.push(var_one);
        self.perm
            .add_variables_to_map(var_six, var_seven, var_min_twenty, var_one, self.n);
        self.n += 1;
        //Add another dummy constraint so that we do not get the identity permutation
        self.q_m.push(BlsScalar::from(1));
        self.q_l.push(BlsScalar::from(1));
        self.q_r.push(BlsScalar::from(1));
        self.q_o.push(BlsScalar::from(1));
        self.q_c.push(BlsScalar::from(127));
        self.q_4.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_arith.push(BlsScalar::one());
        self.q_range.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_logic.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_fixed_group_add.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_variable_group_add.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.public_inputs.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.w_l.push(var_min_twenty);
        self.w_r.push(var_six);
        self.w_o.push(var_seven);
        self.w_4.push(self.zero_var);
        self.perm
            .add_variables_to_map(var_min_twenty, var_six, var_seven, self.zero_var, self.n);
        self.n += 1;
    }

即对于空circuit，默认3个constraint，相应的测试用例为：

	#[test]
    /// Tests that a circuit initially has 3 gates
    fn test_initial_circuit_size() {
        let composer: StandardComposer = StandardComposer::new();
        // Circuit size is n+3 because
        // - We have an extra gate which forces the first witness to be zero. This is used when the advice wire is not being used.
        // - We have two gates which ensure that the permutation polynomial is not the identity and
        // - Another gate which ensures that the selector polynomials are not all zeroes
        assert_eq!(3, composer.circuit_size());
        composer.check_circuit_satisfied(); //打印调试信息。feature中增加"print-trace"
    }

相应的circuit gate satisfied 打印信息为：

--------------------------------------------

            #Gate Index = 0
            #Selector Polynomials:

            - qm -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - ql -> 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - qr -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q4 -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - qo -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - qc -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_arith -> 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_range -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_logic -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_fixed_group_add -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_variable_group_add -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            # Witness polynomials:

            - w_l -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - w_r -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - w_o -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - w_4 -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

--------------------------------------------

            #Gate Index = 1
            #Selector Polynomials:

            - qm -> 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - ql -> 0200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - qr -> 0300000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q4 -> 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - qo -> 0400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - qc -> 0400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_arith -> 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_range -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_logic -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_fixed_group_add -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_variable_group_add -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            # Witness polynomials:

            - w_l -> 0600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - w_r -> 0700000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - w_o -> edfffffffefffffffe5bfeff02a4bd5305d8a10908d83933487d9d2953a7ed73

            - w_4 -> 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

--------------------------------------------

            #Gate Index = 2
            #Selector Polynomials:

            - qm -> 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - ql -> 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - qr -> 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q4 -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - qo -> 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - qc -> 7f00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_arith -> 0100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_range -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_logic -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_fixed_group_add -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - q_variable_group_add -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            # Witness polynomials:

            - w_l -> edfffffffefffffffe5bfeff02a4bd5305d8a10908d83933487d9d2953a7ed73

            - w_r -> 0600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - w_o -> 0700000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

            - w_4 -> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

5.4 multiply constraint

支持left wire、right wire、output wire和fourth wire的加法门。
对于mul gate， $q_l,q_r$ 恒为0。

	/// Adds a width-3 add gate to the circuit linking the product of the
    /// provided inputs scaled by the selector coefficient `q_m` with the output
    /// provided scaled by `q_o`.
    ///
    /// Note that this gate requires to provide the actual result of the gate
    /// (output wire) since it will just add a `mul constraint` to the circuit.
    pub fn mul_gate(
        &mut self,
        a: Variable,
        b: Variable,
        c: Variable,
        q_m: BlsScalar,
        q_o: BlsScalar,
        q_c: BlsScalar,
        pi: BlsScalar,
    ) -> Variable {
        self.big_mul_gate(a, b, c, None, q_m, q_o, q_c, BlsScalar::zero(), pi)
    }

    /// Adds a width-4 `big_mul_gate` with the left, right and fourth inputs
    /// and it's scaling factors, computing & returning the output (result)
    /// `Variable` and adding the corresponding mul constraint.
    ///
    /// This type of gate is usually used when we need to have
    /// the largest amount of performance and the minimum circuit-size
    /// possible. Since it allows the end-user to setup all of the selector
    /// coefficients.
    ///
    /// Forces `q_m * (w_l * w_r) + w_4 * q_4 + q_c + PI = q_o * w_o`.
    ///
    /// `{w_l, w_r, w_o, w_4} = {a, b, c, d}`
    // XXX: Maybe make these tuples instead of individual field?
    pub fn big_mul_gate(
        &mut self,
        a: Variable,
        b: Variable,
        c: Variable,
        d: Option<Variable>,
        q_m: BlsScalar,
        q_o: BlsScalar,
        q_c: BlsScalar,
        q_4: BlsScalar,
        pi: BlsScalar,
    ) -> Variable {
        // Check if advice wire has a value
        let d = match d {
            Some(var) => var,
            None => self.zero_var,
        };

        self.w_l.push(a);
        self.w_r.push(b);
        self.w_o.push(c);
        self.w_4.push(d);

        // For a mul gate q_L and q_R is zero
        self.q_l.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_r.push(BlsScalar::zero());

        // Add selector vectors
        self.q_m.push(q_m);
        self.q_o.push(q_o);
        self.q_c.push(q_c);
        self.q_4.push(q_4);
        self.q_arith.push(BlsScalar::one());

        self.q_range.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_logic.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_fixed_group_add.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_variable_group_add.push(BlsScalar::zero());

        self.public_inputs.push(pi);

        self.perm.add_variables_to_map(a, b, c, d, self.n);

        self.n += 1;

        c
    }

以及

	/// Adds a simple and basic addition to the circuit between to `Variable`s
    /// returning the resulting `Variable`.
    pub fn mul(
        &mut self,
        q_m: BlsScalar,
        a: Variable,
        b: Variable,
        q_c: BlsScalar,
        pi: BlsScalar,
    ) -> Variable {
        self.big_mul(q_m, a, b, None, q_c, pi)
    }

    /// Adds a width-4 `big_mul_gate` with the left, right and fourth inputs
    /// and it's scaling factors, computing & returning the output (result)
    /// `Variable` and adding the corresponding mul constraint.
    ///
    /// This type of gate is usually used when we don't need to have
    /// the largest amount of performance and the minimum circuit-size
    /// possible. Since it defaults some of the selector coeffs = 0 in order
    /// to reduce the verbosity and complexity.
    ///
    /// Forces `q_m * (w_l * w_r) + w_4 * q_4 + q_c + PI = w_o(computed by the gate)`.
    ///
    /// `{w_l, w_r, w_4} = {a, b, d}`
    // XXX: This API is not consistent. It should use tuples and not individual fields
    pub fn big_mul(
        &mut self,
        q_m: BlsScalar,
        a: Variable,
        b: Variable,
        q_4_d: Option<(BlsScalar, Variable)>,
        q_c: BlsScalar,
        pi: BlsScalar,
    ) -> Variable {
        let q_o = -BlsScalar::one();

        // Check if advice wire is available
        let (q_4, d) = match q_4_d {
            Some((q_4, var)) => (q_4, var),
            None => (BlsScalar::zero(), self.zero_var),
        };

        // Compute output wire
        let a_eval = self.variables[&a];
        let b_eval = self.variables[&b];
        let d_eval = self.variables[&d];
        let c_eval = (q_m * a_eval * b_eval) + (q_4 * d_eval) + q_c + pi;
        let c = self.add_input(c_eval);

        self.big_mul_gate(a, b, c, Some(d), q_m, q_o, q_c, q_4, pi)
    }

5.5 add constraint

支持left wire、right wire、output wire和fourth wire的加法门。
对于add gate， $q_m$ 恒为0。

	/// Adds a width-3 add gate to the circuit, linking the addition of the
    /// provided inputs, scaled by the selector coefficients with the output
    /// provided.
    pub fn add_gate(
        &mut self,
        a: Variable,
        b: Variable,
        c: Variable,
        q_l: BlsScalar,
        q_r: BlsScalar,
        q_o: BlsScalar,
        q_c: BlsScalar,
        pi: BlsScalar,
    ) -> Variable {
        self.big_add_gate(a, b, c, None, q_l, q_r, q_o, BlsScalar::zero(), q_c, pi)
    }

	/// Adds a width-4 add gate to the circuit and it's corresponding
    /// constraint.
    ///
    /// This type of gate is usually used when we need to have
    /// the largest amount of performance and the minimum circuit-size
    /// possible. Since it allows the end-user to set every selector coefficient
    /// as scaling value on the gate eq.
    pub fn big_add_gate(
        &mut self,
        a: Variable,
        b: Variable,
        c: Variable,
        d: Option<Variable>,
        q_l: BlsScalar,
        q_r: BlsScalar,
        q_o: BlsScalar,
        q_4: BlsScalar,
        q_c: BlsScalar,
        pi: BlsScalar,
    ) -> Variable {
        // Check if advice wire has a value
        let d = match d { //若为None，则解析为零变量。
            Some(var) => var,
            None => self.zero_var,
        };

        self.w_l.push(a);
        self.w_r.push(b);
        self.w_o.push(c);
        self.w_4.push(d);

        // For an add gate, q_m is zero
        self.q_m.push(BlsScalar::zero());

        // Add selector vectors
        self.q_l.push(q_l);
        self.q_r.push(q_r);
        self.q_o.push(q_o);
        self.q_c.push(q_c);
        self.q_4.push(q_4);
        self.q_arith.push(BlsScalar::one());
        self.q_range.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_logic.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_fixed_group_add.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_variable_group_add.push(BlsScalar::zero());

        self.public_inputs.push(pi);

        self.perm.add_variables_to_map(a, b, c, d, self.n);

        self.n += 1;

        c
    }

以及

	/// Adds a `big_addition_gate` with the left and right inputs
    /// and it's scaling factors, computing & returning the output (result)
    /// `Variable`, and adding the corresponding addition constraint.
    ///
    /// This type of gate is usually used when we don't need to have
    /// the largest amount of performance as well as the minimum circuit-size
    /// possible. Since it defaults some of the selector coeffs = 0 in order
    /// to reduce the verbosity and complexity.
    ///
    /// Forces `q_l * w_l + q_r * w_r + q_c + PI = w_o(computed by the gate)`.
    pub fn add(
        &mut self,
        q_l_a: (BlsScalar, Variable),
        q_r_b: (BlsScalar, Variable),
        q_c: BlsScalar,
        pi: BlsScalar,
    ) -> Variable {
        self.big_add(q_l_a, q_r_b, None, q_c, pi)
    }

    /// Adds a `big_addition_gate` with the left, right and fourth inputs
    /// and it's scaling factors, computing & returning the output (result)
    /// `Variable` and adding the corresponding addition constraint.
    ///
    /// This type of gate is usually used when we don't need to have
    /// the largest amount of performance and the minimum circuit-size
    /// possible. Since it defaults some of the selector coeffs = 0 in order
    /// to reduce the verbosity and complexity.
    ///
    /// Forces `q_l * w_l + q_r * w_r + q_4 * w_4 + q_c + PI = w_o(computed by the gate)`.
    pub fn big_add(
        &mut self,
        q_l_a: (BlsScalar, Variable),
        q_r_b: (BlsScalar, Variable),
        q_4_d: Option<(BlsScalar, Variable)>,
        q_c: BlsScalar,
        pi: BlsScalar,
    ) -> Variable {
        // Check if advice wire is available
        let (q_4, d) = match q_4_d {
            Some((q_4, var)) => (q_4, var),
            None => (BlsScalar::zero(), self.zero_var),
        };

        let (q_l, a) = q_l_a;
        let (q_r, b) = q_r_b;

        let q_o = -BlsScalar::one();

        // Compute the output wire
        let a_eval = self.variables[&a];
        let b_eval = self.variables[&b];
        let d_eval = self.variables[&d];
        let c_eval = (q_l * a_eval) + (q_r * b_eval) + (q_4 * d_eval) + q_c + pi;
        let c = self.add_input(c_eval);

        self.big_add_gate(a, b, c, Some(d), q_l, q_r, q_o, q_4, q_c, pi)
    }

5.6 boolean constraint 又称为 binary constraint

boolean constraint 又名 binary constraint，是指约束变量值要么为“0”，要么为“1”。
核心思想就是：若 $a (1 - a) = 0$ ，即 $a$ 为0或1。

	/// Adds a boolean constraint (also known as binary constraint) where
    /// the gate eq. will enforce that the `Variable` received is either `0`
    /// or `1` by adding a constraint in the circuit.
    ///
    /// Note that using this constraint with whatever `Variable` that is not
    /// representing a value equalling 0 or 1, will always force the equation to fail.
    pub fn boolean_gate(&mut self, a: Variable) -> Variable {
        self.w_l.push(a);
        self.w_r.push(a);
        self.w_o.push(a);
        self.w_4.push(self.zero_var);

        self.q_m.push(BlsScalar::one());
        self.q_l.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_r.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_o.push(-BlsScalar::one());
        self.q_c.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_4.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_arith.push(BlsScalar::one());

        self.q_range.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_logic.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_fixed_group_add.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_variable_group_add.push(BlsScalar::zero());

        self.public_inputs.push(BlsScalar::zero());

        self.perm
            .add_variables_to_map(a, a, a, self.zero_var, self.n);

        self.n += 1;

        a
    }

5.7 fixed group add constraint

#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy)]
/// Contains all of the components needed to verify that a bit scalar multiplication was computed correctly
pub(crate) struct WnafRound {
    /// This is the accumulated x coordinate point that we wish to add (so far.. depends on where you are in the scalar mul)
    /// it is linked to the wnaf entry, so must not be revealed
    pub acc_x: Variable,
    /// This is the accumulated y coordinate
    pub acc_y: Variable,

    /// This is the wnaf accumulated entry
    /// For all intents and purposes, you can think of this as the secret bit
    pub accumulated_bit: Variable,

    /// This is the multiplication of x_\alpha * y_\alpha
    /// we need this as a distinct wire, so that the degree of the polynomial does not go over 4
    pub xy_alpha: Variable,
    /// This is the possible x co-ordinate of the wnaf point we are going to add
    /// Actual x-co-ordinate = b_i * x_\beta
    pub x_beta: BlsScalar,
    /// This is the possible y co-ordinate of the wnaf point we are going to add
    /// Actual y coordinate = (b_i)^2 [y_\beta -1] + 1
    pub y_beta: BlsScalar,
    /// This is the multiplication of x_\beta * y_\beta
    pub xy_beta: BlsScalar,
}

	/// Fixed group addition of a jubjub point
    pub(crate) fn fixed_group_add(&mut self, wnaf_round: WnafRound) {
        self.w_l.push(wnaf_round.acc_x);
        self.w_r.push(wnaf_round.acc_y);
        self.w_o.push(wnaf_round.xy_alpha);
        self.w_4.push(wnaf_round.accumulated_bit);

        self.q_l.push(wnaf_round.x_beta);
        self.q_r.push(wnaf_round.y_beta);

        self.q_c.push(wnaf_round.xy_beta);
        self.q_o.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_fixed_group_add.push(BlsScalar::one());
        self.q_variable_group_add.push(BlsScalar::zero());

        self.q_m.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_4.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_arith.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_range.push(BlsScalar::zero());
        self.q_logic.push(BlsScalar::zero());

        self.public_inputs.push(BlsScalar::zero());

        self.perm.add_variables_to_map(
            wnaf_round.acc_x,
            wnaf_round.acc_y,
            wnaf_round.xy_alpha,
            wnaf_round.accumulated_bit,
            self.n,
        );

        self.n += 1;
    }

5.8 xor logic constraint

logic_gate中是同时对两个bit进行and或xor操作。【logic_gate中的q_c,w_o 设置懵圈中，与check_circuit_satisfied中计算公式不匹配？未约束w_o？】

	/// Adds a logical XOR gate that performs the XOR between two values for the
    /// specified first `num_bits` returning a `Variable` holding the result.
    ///
    /// # Panics
    ///
    /// If the `num_bits` specified in the fn params is odd.
    pub fn xor_gate(&mut self, a: Variable, b: Variable, num_bits: usize) -> Variable {
        self.logic_gate(a, b, num_bits, true)
    }

5.9 and logic constraint

logic_gate中是同时对两个bit进行and或xor操作。【logic_gate中的q_c,w_o 设置懵圈中，与check_circuit_satisfied中计算公式不匹配？未约束w_o？】

	/// Adds a logical AND gate that performs the bitwise AND between two values
    /// for the specified first `num_bits` returning a `Variable` holding the result.
    ///
    /// # Panics
    ///
    /// If the `num_bits` specified in the fn params is odd.
    pub fn and_gate(&mut self, a: Variable, b: Variable, num_bits: usize) -> Variable {
        self.logic_gate(a, b, num_bits, false)
    }

5.10 range constraint

具体见https://github.com/dusk-network/plonk/blob/master/src/constraint_system/range.rs 中 pub fn range_gate(&mut self, witness: Variable, num_bits: usize) 函数，对应的constraints数量为：
num_bits/8+1

以32bit为例，相应的constraint数量为32/8+1=5。

6. proof system

实际代码中，设计了六种不同类型的gate，分别为：

arithmetic gate
logic gate
range gate
ecc fixed base curve addition gate
ecc variable base curve addition gate
permutation check

6.1 preprocess

借助pad函数，通过附加零变量和零值的方式，使得circuit的constraint数量为power of two。

6.2 Prover端

/// Prover composes a circuit and builds a proof
#[allow(missing_debug_implementations)]
pub struct Prover {
    /// ProverKey which is used to create proofs about a specific PLONK circuit
    pub prover_key: Option<ProverKey>,

    pub(crate) cs: StandardComposer,
    /// Store the messages exchanged during the preprocessing stage
    /// This is copied each time, we make a proof
    pub preprocessed_transcript: Transcript,
}

/// PLONK circuit proving key
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Clone)]
pub struct ProverKey {
    /// Circuit size
    pub n: usize,
    /// ProverKey for arithmetic gate
    pub arithmetic: arithmetic::ProverKey,
    /// ProverKey for logic gate
    pub logic: logic::ProverKey,
    /// ProverKey for range gate
    pub range: range::ProverKey,
    /// ProverKey for fixed base curve addition gates
    pub fixed_base: ecc::scalar_mul::fixed_base::ProverKey,
    /// ProverKey for permutation checks
    pub permutation: permutation::ProverKey,
    /// ProverKey for variable base curve addition gates
    pub variable_base: ecc::curve_addition::ProverKey,
    // Pre-processes the 4n Evaluations for the vanishing polynomial, so they do not
    // need to be computed at the proving stage.
    // Note: With this, we can combine all parts of the quotient polynomial in their evaluation phase and
    // divide by the quotient polynomial without having to perform IFFT
    pub(crate) v_h_coset_4n: Evaluations,
}

实际实现时，根据circuit中gate类型分类不同，分别实现了不同的ProverKey：

1）对于 arithmetic gate，有：

#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Clone)]
pub struct ProverKey {
    pub q_m: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub q_l: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub q_r: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub q_o: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub q_c: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub q_4: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub q_arith: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
}

2）对于 logic gate，有：

#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Clone)]
pub struct ProverKey {
    pub q_c: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub q_logic: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
}

3）对于 range gate，有：

#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Clone)]
pub struct ProverKey {
    pub q_range: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
}

4）对于 ecc fixed base curve addition gate，有：

#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Clone)]
pub struct ProverKey {
    pub q_l: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub q_r: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub q_c: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub q_fixed_group_add: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
}

5）对于 ecc variable base curve addition gate，有：

#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Clone)]
pub struct ProverKey {
    pub q_variable_group_add: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
}

6）对于permutation check，主要用于验证circuit中wire之间的约束关系，有：

#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Clone)]
pub struct ProverKey {
    pub left_sigma: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub right_sigma: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub out_sigma: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub fourth_sigma: (Polynomial, Evaluations),
    pub linear_evaluations: Evaluations, // Evaluations of f(x) = X [XXX: Remove this and benchmark if it makes a considerable difference -- These are just the domain elements]
}

6.3 Verifier端

/// Verifier verifies a proof
#[allow(missing_debug_implementations)]
pub struct Verifier {
    /// VerificationKey which is used to verify a specific PLONK circuit
    pub verifier_key: Option<VerifierKey>,

    pub(crate) cs: StandardComposer,
    /// Store the messages exchanged during the preprocessing stage
    /// This is copied each time, we make a proof, so that we can use the same verifier to
    /// Verify multiple proofs from the same circuit. If this is not copied, then the verification procedure will modify
    /// the transcript, making it unusable for future proofs.
    pub preprocessed_transcript: Transcript,
}

/// PLONK circuit verification key
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Copy, Clone)]
pub struct VerifierKey {
    /// Circuit size
    pub n: usize,
    /// VerifierKey for arithmetic gates
    pub arithmetic: arithmetic::VerifierKey,
    /// VerifierKey for logic gates
    pub logic: logic::VerifierKey,
    /// VerifierKey for range gates
    pub range: range::VerifierKey,
    /// VerifierKey for fixed base curve addition gates
    pub fixed_base: ecc::scalar_mul::fixed_base::VerifierKey,
    /// VerifierKey for variable base curve addition gates
    pub variable_base: ecc::curve_addition::VerifierKey,
    /// VerifierKey for permutation checks
    pub permutation: permutation::VerifierKey,
}

实际实现时，根据circuit中gate类型分类不同，分别实现了不同的VerifierKey：

1）对于 arithmetic gate，有：

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Copy, Clone)]
pub struct VerifierKey {
    pub q_m: Commitment,
    pub q_l: Commitment,
    pub q_r: Commitment,
    pub q_o: Commitment,
    pub q_c: Commitment,
    pub q_4: Commitment,
    pub q_arith: Commitment,
}

2）对于 logic gate，有：

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Copy, Clone)]
pub struct VerifierKey {
    pub q_c: Commitment,
    pub q_logic: Commitment,
}

3）对于 range gate，有：

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Copy, Clone)]
pub struct VerifierKey {
    pub q_range: Commitment,
}

4）对于 ecc fixed base curve addition gate，有：

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Copy, Clone)]
pub struct VerifierKey {
    pub q_l: Commitment,
    pub q_r: Commitment,
    pub q_fixed_group_add: Commitment,
}

5）对于 ecc variable base curve addition gate，有：

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Copy, Clone)]
pub struct VerifierKey {
    pub q_variable_group_add: Commitment,
}

6）对于permutation check，主要用于验证circuit中wire之间的约束关系，有：

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Copy, Clone)]
pub struct VerifierKey {
    pub left_sigma: Commitment,
    pub right_sigma: Commitment,
    pub out_sigma: Commitment,
    pub fourth_sigma: Commitment,
}

6.4 proof

proof的组成有：【根本目的是使得Verifier可 verify() 通过。】

witness polynomials 的commitments 及相应的evaluations；
permutation polynomials 的commitments 及相应的evaluations；
quotient polynomials 的commitments 及相应的evaluations；
shifted polynomials 的commitments 及相应的evaluations；
opening polynomials 的commitments 及相应的evaluations。

/// A Proof is a composition of `Commitments` to the witness, permutation,
/// quotient, shifted and opening polynomials as well as the
/// `ProofEvaluations`.
///
/// It's main goal is to have a `verify()` method attached which contains the
/// logic of the operations that the `Verifier` will need to do in order to
/// formally verify the `Proof`.
#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Clone)]
pub struct Proof {
    /// Commitment to the witness polynomial for the left wires.
    pub a_comm: Commitment,
    /// Commitment to the witness polynomial for the right wires.
    pub b_comm: Commitment,
    /// Commitment to the witness polynomial for the output wires.
    pub c_comm: Commitment,
    /// Commitment to the witness polynomial for the fourth wires.
    pub d_comm: Commitment,

    /// Commitment to the permutation polynomial.
    pub z_comm: Commitment,

    /// Commitment to the quotient polynomial.
    pub t_1_comm: Commitment,
    /// Commitment to the quotient polynomial.
    pub t_2_comm: Commitment,
    /// Commitment to the quotient polynomial.
    pub t_3_comm: Commitment,
    /// Commitment to the quotient polynomial.
    pub t_4_comm: Commitment,

    /// Commitment to the opening polynomial.
    pub w_z_comm: Commitment,
    /// Commitment to the shifted opening polynomial.
    pub w_zw_comm: Commitment,
    /// Subset of all of the evaluations added to the proof.
    pub evaluations: ProofEvaluations,
}

/// Proof Evaluations is a subset of all of the evaluations. These evaluations will be added to the proof
#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Clone)]
pub struct ProofEvaluations {
    // Evaluation of the witness polynomial for the left wire at `z`
    pub a_eval: BlsScalar,
    // Evaluation of the witness polynomial for the right wire at `z`
    pub b_eval: BlsScalar,
    // Evaluation of the witness polynomial for the output wire at `z`
    pub c_eval: BlsScalar,
    // Evaluation of the witness polynomial for the fourth wire at `z`
    pub d_eval: BlsScalar,
    //
    pub a_next_eval: BlsScalar,
    //
    pub b_next_eval: BlsScalar,
    // Evaluation of the witness polynomial for the fourth wire at `z * root of unity`
    pub d_next_eval: BlsScalar,
    // Evaluation of the arithmetic selector polynomial at `z`
    pub q_arith_eval: BlsScalar,
    //
    pub q_c_eval: BlsScalar,
    //
    pub q_l_eval: BlsScalar,
    //
    pub q_r_eval: BlsScalar,
    // Evaluation of the left sigma polynomial at `z`
    pub left_sigma_eval: BlsScalar,
    // Evaluation of the right sigma polynomial at `z`
    pub right_sigma_eval: BlsScalar,
    // Evaluation of the out sigma polynomial at `z`
    pub out_sigma_eval: BlsScalar,

    // Evaluation of the linearisation sigma polynomial at `z`
    pub lin_poly_eval: BlsScalar,

    // (Shifted) Evaluation of the permutation polynomial at `z * root of unity`
    pub perm_eval: BlsScalar,
}

Plonk代码解析