Panel members Liming Min Xing Fang Li Yun Zhuzhen Kai Zhu Heng whole
A. How should arrange QA team
For how to arrange our QA team work, our team arranged plan is as follows:
1, the scientific development and implementation of quality management programs;
2, the allocation of responsibilities clear;
3, emphasis on testing phase of the software project, arrange for the necessary time, using a reasonable method to fully test;
4, to enhance the team members the sense of quality;
5, positive and effective communication;
6, to develop quality inspection plan;
7, develop quality inspection standards;
8, not just the feel of inspection work, but according to the standard of quality checks.
9, quality inspection promptly resolve identified the problem, achieve quality inspection.
II. How the team should arrange testing
For most of the R & D team, testing resources are always in a state of tension. Then schedule a test resources, especially in the limited time, as well as in the case of the test can not be increased manpower. We believe that by their duties, fulfill their duties idea to arrange testing in order to maximize the efficiency of the test team.
By motivating players to test full play to their potential, and to develop teamwork atmosphere increased teamwork, work in unison to maximize the effectiveness of team play. Different test stages to take a different test strategies, positioning effects such as occurs during the test, Ugliness fatigue and assimilation phenomenon may take cross test to circumvent encourage innovation, changing test methods to improve testing efficiency; try to make everyone do something different reduce overlap and internal friction, in the above have complementary expertise, give full play to their respective strengths. When the limited testing personnel, while R & D team more than one task at the same time, it should be determined primarily according to different debug people yuan and complexity of the business cycle. Business high complexity and long cycle, at least you have to have a special person in charge, the best two people to become familiar with the business. If the leisure business, so leaving the person in charge of the special test other services, can also be transferred to other busy people to join the test according to the situation of other business lines. Two people familiar with the business, while ensuring that the turnover time of special tests, tests of convergence of this business. In all cases the quality of skills are similar, if more who can identify problems, and can optimize the views put forward some more constructive and will conduct business more smoothly.
Test scheme can not change, the question arises, test time of conflict, the case of testers can not increase our involvement should be tested as soon as possible (refer to an access time test implementation), it is best to join integration testing, that is, when do develop an interface, time or modules, it should intervene tests. Do not wait for all the stuff out and then measured, so that it can not find some bad habits in front of developers, allowed to avoid the follow-up, resulting in what is responsible in testing issues continue, also led after the deal is no more time behind the compression test measures.
Secondly, it should mark the priority of the function module test, in case of shortage of time should try to ensure that high-priority section can be fully tested. In the business complex, long cycle of the project, it is best to prepare some basic test cases, so as to avoid the appearance that we missed in tight situations, to avoid accidents hair. We need to learn that we sort out a workable testing specification through the network, which found the development process design error, defect management, test standards.
Finally, in the arrangement of personnel, but also it should vary, that is arranged according to each person's situation to the appropriate test to go. Everyone is difficult to do good at all, if by a reasonable arrangement, so that everyone gave their maximum capacity, it is bound to do more with less. Otherwise it will be less effective, while countering the enthusiasm of the staff, eventually leading to had to leave. So, if a tester can be recognized by others, and also whether there is a reasonable top managers about the organization of work according to the case made by the tester.
Finally, staff arrangements test is not so difficult to imagine, first look to test the quality of personnel, followed by more wisdom brainstorming to solve. Everyone has their own expertise, it is necessary to maintain a good expertise and innovation, to learn from each other, learn to seniority old colleagues, ask more and more sum in mind, industry, diligence. Give full play to their respective advantages team, and provide moderate relaxed environment for the other members of the team and autonomy of time dominate, team efficiency will be high.