Objective analysis about the evaluation of the boss

Objective analysis about the evaluation of the boss

Submitted by:  Anonymous  2003 May 9 18:36:49 in [academic education]  Send a private message

In fact, the United States must not believe what the boss nice lie. According to my sampling (CS Department 10 20-50 University), at this level, the level of an American professor is a grade lower than foreign professors. Foreign professors generally more dedication, to themselves and others are more stringent. This is the background. Indeed most of the American owners do not push, this culture of reason in it, but this sometimes comes at a price. That is a lot of American professors walk away is the boss, no matter what. Regardless of your research, regardless of the progress of your paper, do not help you find a job. At the macro point of view, the United States so relaxed, freedom, depend on themselves social atmosphere is conducive to play the people's initiative. But on the micro level, this American teacher sheep management leads many students to graduation, a little competition in the job market capital at all. After the boss do not think he can help you find a job obligations, many Chinese students comfortable in school for several years, after a look back, no paper, do not know what graduation, graduated not know where to find a job. Such examples are common. Perhaps the proportion of China's tough boss is relatively high, but Chinese students how many nice it? For example it, steal transfer, it is common in Chinese students. I remember a student promised his boss to complete a paper on this version, the results themselves secretly transfer, walked out! After development, as he describes to "My boss does not even know where to find my email ...". I was stunned to see that. Students come to the United States, mixed in academia, you can do that? The day that you make a boss, a proposal is busy deadline of up in the morning, found that students do not come, and then found he appeared on another school's home page, administrators can also find a letter to the email ... you think? Like father like son. Chinese graduate student boil a few years to become a professor of Chinese. He said: Yi Jiang change its spots. Selfish, greedy selfish greed is the student after the professor. Big heart of student life and later became a professor of righteousness. So, Professor of China's overall moral quality, reflects the quality of Chinese students a few years ago, it is so simple. When the boss of their own teeth, think about whether their own moral standards deserve a good boss. My evaluation of the boss is this: The best boss: push + a good idea. There is such a boss, when they graduate, fruitful, you are most grateful. Many high level of foreign owners belong to this category. 4 years PHD, you can often go through a good, complete training. Best boss: non-push + a good idea. This is generally a very high level American owners. Most of the high quality of the research is to do it in such an environment. But the danger is that if you are not self-motived, most likely a waste of a good boss. Difference boss: non-push + does not come up with ideas, or a bad idea. This is the American professor that enjoy life in general. You basically the sheep. Can comfortably a few years, to the time they graduate thrown off balance. Such professors have absolutely no ability to give you the recommended work. It was the worst boss: push + all bad ideas. Note that such professors sometimes it can out of paper, of course, full of garbage. He will feel that they are cattle, or try to cover up his cattle. The attitude of the students is to try to keep their dignity, never admit. There is such a boss, from a general point of view, it tells you bad luck. But from the devil to get along with exercise and perspective, not necessarily a bad thing to see. If you like this boss men graduated, after there is nothing insurmountable challenge.