QQ Music and Netease Cloud Music Evaluation Analysis
| project | content |
|---|---|
| which course this assignment belongs to | Beihang 2022 Spring Agile Software Engineering |
| which course this assignment belongs to | Personal Assignment - Software Case Analysis |
| My goal in this course is to | Understand and improve one's understanding and practical ability of software engineering, strengthen software development skills and teamwork ability, and gain practical experience in software engineering |
| In what specific way did this assignment help me achieve my goals? | Understand the importance of software engineering in software products by analyzing, evaluating, thinking, and summarizing specific software |
Part I Research and Evaluation
I chose QQ Music and Netease Cloud Music, and I will investigate and evaluate them respectively below.
NetEase Cloud Music
Test the following versions of NetEase Cloud Music:
- IOS (iPad Air4): Version 2.0.87
- Android (Huawei Mate20 Pro): Version 8.7.03.193311
- Windows (Y7000p 2020): Version 2.9.8
basic function
- Discover
the first page displayed after entering the software. It includes daily recommendations, private FM, song list plaza, rankings, etc. In addition, the interface scrolls down to song recommendations, song list recommendations, popular podcasts, etc. This interface can basically satisfy users' discovery of new songs. Of course, Netease Cloud's recommendations are indeed excellent.
- The podcast
is divided into two modules: recommendations and stories. There are some interesting storytelling, some cover creations, and some informative lectures. - My
shows some personal information, and at the same time, I can see my favorite music, my playlist, friends, cloud disk, etc.
- Follow
You can see the news posted by the friends or singers you follow. - Yuncun
All kinds of videos are divided into categories such as square, popular, live, etc., and you can view the videos you are interested in. - Music Playing Page
The design of the music playing interface is more attractive, imitating the form of a record, and at the same time, it has the function of listening together, and you can press and hold real-time voice, send text chat, etc.
Of course, Netease Cloud is most famous for its "Net Ease Cloud", that is, the song comments inside, which is also my favorite point, and I can often see some interesting sentences in the comments.
- Others
On the upper left, you can enter more, view member information, some other services, and settings, etc.
Experience
Overall, the experience of using NetEase Cloud Music is very good. Since you have a membership, there is no advertisement when you enter the software, which is considered a relatively friendly service.
The design of the interface is more beautiful, and the classification of the pages is relatively clear. For example, users only need to click to find the music they may like. Unlike QQ Music, which has made some recommended pages and lists separately, it may cause users to switch between different The interface is more troublesome to operate.
In the experience of listening to songs, it provides a heartbeat mode to automatically recommend songs for users. As far as personal usage is concerned, I generally like these recommended songs.
As for the active community, the comment area of Netease Cloud is very interesting, with many netizens interacting.
The search function is also relatively complete, you can search for songs, singers, lyrics, etc.
The other is the function of listening together. You can invite friends to listen to songs with you, and at the same time, you can send messages or real-time voice to the other party. I think the experience is better.
In terms of music resources, the copyright of Netease Cloud Music is gradually decreasing, which is not as good as the current QQ Music. From the picture below, you can see that some of the music in my collection has no copyright, but most of the music I like is still available. heard.
Advantages and disadvantages analysis
- advantage
- The recommendation mechanism is good. The heartbeat mode and daily recommendation are basically all the ways for me to get new songs, and private FM can also recommend my favorite songs. The recommendations of other playlists are also in line with my taste.
- The community is very active. You can find a lot of interesting comments in the music comment area. You can read the comments while listening to the song. The experience is very good.
- shortcoming
- Copyright is less in comparison. At present, QQ Music has more copyrights than NetEase Cloud, which has also led to the loss of some users. Recently, NetEase Cloud has been unable to listen to more and more songs, which some fans do not want to see.
Suggestions for improvement
- Increase the purchase of copyrights to prevent existing songs from disappearing from the user's playlist.
- There is a problem with Chinese and English adaptation. It is recommended to re-adapt and display in a unified language.
bug description
Before explaining the bug, first classify the bugs according to the recurrence rate and user experience: Experience evaluation)
| grading | Recurrence rate and user experience |
|---|---|
| ⭐ | The recurrence rate is extremely low, and the impact on users is minimal |
| ⭐⭐ | High recurrence rate, less impact on users |
| ⭐⭐⭐ | Fully reproducible, with little impact on user usage |
| ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | The recurrence rate is high and has a great impact on user usage |
| ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | It is completely reproducible and has a great impact on user usage |
Listening together with multiple threads out of sync
- Test environment: Android (Huawei Mate20 Pro) Netease Cloud version 8.7.03.193311
- Probability of recurrence: very high recurrence rate
- Steps to reproduce:
- Two people use the function of listening together
- Two people switch to different songs at the same time
-
Description of the problem:
At the beginning, both users are listening to song A. After switching to different songs at the same time (for example, user 1 switches to song B, user 2 switches to song C), then it will be found that end user 1 has been synchronized to the song C and user 2 is synchronized to song B, that is, the songs of the two are swapped. Obviously, this synchronization design contains multi-threading problems. In contrast, QQ Music does not have this kind of song swapping. -
Bug analysis:
I think the reasons for the bug may be as follows:
1. The synchronization operation is essentially to send a request to the other party to switch to its own song. When two users send requests to each other at the same time, the other party will switch to The other party's songs, leading to the exchange situation.
2. There is no thread-safe handling of the situation where two requests occur at the same time. -
Seriousness of the bug
From the perspective of system functions, the synchronization function of listening together here is not perfect, and there is no thread-safe processing, resulting in users listening together but not actually listening to a song synchronously. Due to the high recurrence rate and great impact on user experience, I think this bug can be rated as ⭐⭐⭐⭐. -
Expectations for bugs and suggestions for improvement
Do some thread-safe processing, and lock the operation of switching songs. -
Bug feedback:
-
Improper adaptation of Chinese and English
-
Test environment: Android (Huawei Mate20 Pro) Netease Cloud version 8.7.03.193311
-
Probability of recurrence: completely reproducible
-
Steps to reproduce:
- Switch the system language to English. Or switch to English in the language settings of NetEase Cloud.
- Use the software to see the mixed use of Chinese and English everywhere.
-
Description of the problem:
After setting the language to English, you will find that part of the text is switched to English, while the other part is still in Chinese. There is a situation where Chinese and English are mixed, which is very bad for some users who are accustomed to English. -
Bug analysis:
I think the reason for the bug may be that
when making the app, part of the font library in Chinese and English has been prepared, so after switching to English, it has successfully changed to the English version, while the other part has not been adapted accordingly, resulting in this Part of it is still Chinese after switching to English. -
Bug severity
In terms of system function, the system adaptation here is not perfect, and it has not been fully processed in English, resulting in the mixed use of Chinese and English in the English mode. Since it is completely reproducible, but the average user will not switch to English, it will have little impact on the user experience. I think this bug can be rated as ⭐⭐⭐. -
Anticipation and improvement suggestions for bugs
English processing of parts that have not been adapted. -
Bug feedback:
-
Super long emoji comments are not visible to others
-
Test environment: Android (Huawei Mate20 Pro) Netease Cloud version 8.7.03.193311
-
Probability of recurrence: completely reproducible
-
Steps to reproduce:
- Post a news.
- Comment A string of comments reaching the maximum character limit.
- Use other people's accounts to view the dynamics.
-
Description of the problem:
When the comment is too long, only you can see the comment. You can see the first picture above. One of my comments cannot be seen by another classmate. In addition, the number of comments displayed in the dynamic list and after clicking on the dynamic display The number of comments for is inconsistent. -
Bug analysis:
I think the reasons for the bug may be:
1. When encountering too long comments, especially emoticons, are not stored in the database correctly, only users themselves can query the comments.
2. When counting the number of comments, the number of comments counted in the list is obtained from the perspective of others, so it is different from the number of comments obtained after entering the feed. -
The severity of the bug
In terms of system function, this involves the design of the database system. Comments that are invisible to other users will cause users to think that they have sent comments, but in fact others cannot see them. The user experience is very bad. I think this bug Rated ⭐⭐⭐⭐. -
Anticipation of bugs and suggestions for improvement
Deal with super-long comments accordingly, troubleshoot database design issues, ensure that others can see super-long comments, and ensure that the number of comments in the dynamic list is the same as in the dynamics.
in conclusion
Based on the above analysis, analyze from the following dimensions:
| dimension | specific situation | Score |
|---|---|---|
| basic function | The basic music functions are complete, and the basic functions such as song playback and sharing are complete. The recommendation function is very good | ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ |
| Novel features | Provides the function of listening together, and can chat in real time, and the heartbeat mode is also very good | ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ |
| user experience | Heartbeat mode and other recommendation systems can bring users a good listening experience | ❤️❤️❤️❤️ |
| Rich music library | There are fewer and fewer copyrights, and many songs can only be listened to on QQ Music | ❤️❤️❤️ |
| beautiful interface | It imitates the interface of a record, and is generally more beautiful, and also provides a series of personalized settings | ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ |
Final score: d) Good, not bad
QQ Music
Test the following versions of QQ Music:
- IOS (iPad Air4): Version 11.5.1
- Android (Huawei Mate20 Pro): Version 11.5.1
- Windows (Y7000p 2020): Version 18.59
basic function
-
Home
The first interface displayed after entering the software is divided into the following sub-pages:-
Recommendation
Recommend related songs, playlists, podcasts, albums, live broadcasts, videos, radio stations, etc. based on user preferences.
-
The music hall
contains various singers, song rankings, new songs and new albums, classified areas, music radio stations, etc. This interface is more inclined to display the latest and hottest songs to users.
-
Radio stations
include various types of radio stations, radio categories, popular radio stations, today's hot broadcasts, emotional tree holes, audiobooks, etc. Users can find the radio stations they are interested in on this interface, and they can also see the latest and hottest radio stations.
-
Podcasts
This interface displays the latest updated podcasts and presents them to users in the form of a timeline.
-
-
Live broadcast
This interface contains various live broadcasts, and users can choose to enter the live broadcast room according to their own preferences, but the layout of several sub-interfaces is basically the same, only one is taken here as an example.
- Hear
Live broadcast rooms that mainly focus on sound, such as music, emotion, talk shows, etc. - See
live broadcast rooms that mainly focus on visuals, such as dance, appearance, etc. - Make friends
A live broadcast room that mainly focuses on making friends, such as chatting, matching, etc. - Featured
Promote some columns and anchors.
- Hear
-
MV
is similar to the design of Douyin short video, providing users with short videos.
-
Community
is mainly divided into two modules: Square and Follow, providing community functions similar to Weibo.- Square
Recommends some updates to the user.
- Follow
Users can see the updates posted by the singers or friends they follow.
- Square
-
My
contains personal information, favorite playlists, recently played, etc. In addition, the upper right also contains the entrance of notifications and settings.
-
Listening to songs interface
When listening to songs, you can click to enter the listening to songs interface. Provides song cover and lyrics display.
In addition, you can click to enter the comment area.
The sharing function provides various forms, and you can also invite friends to join in and listen to the song synchronously.
Experience
Overall, the user experience of QQ Music is still good. But when entering the software, there will be about 5s of advertisements and the skip button is small, although most of the software currently has such advertisements.
The design of the interface is also good. It is divided into upper and lower navigation bars. At the same time, the buttons, cards and other elements appearing in the interface are designed with rounded corners, which makes people feel more comfortable.
In the listening experience, in addition to viewing the cover and lyrics of the song, it also provides relevant recommendations. You can see related playlists containing the song, other songs of the artist, and other versions of the song.
The most surprising thing is that QQ Music has implemented a function of viewing music scores. This function provides great convenience for some users who want to play. There is no need to search for music scores on the Internet, and there is no need to worry about not being able to find some niche music scores online.
However, by default, the music background effects and singer video are turned on, which looks a bit gimmicky, although you can also enter the settings to turn it off, but for new users who just use QQ Music and don’t like too gaudy, this feature may be discouraged. them.
The search function is quite satisfactory. In all interfaces, you can click the search box to start searching, but the entered search interface is the same, so the returned results are also consistent. There is no independent search interface for a specific interface.
Personally, I don't use the radio function much, but the initial experience is okay, but when I want to learn English, I can't find relevant resources. Among the recommendations for entering language learning, only Babybus was found (laughs).
The other is the function of listening together, which allows you to invite friends to listen to songs with you, but this function has a little deficiency, and it cannot send messages or real-time voice to each other like NetEase Cloud Music.
In terms of music resources, QQ Music should be the music software with the most copyrights at present, but there are many songs that require membership to listen to. Even with a membership, the monthly downloads are limited.
Advantages and disadvantages analysis
- advantage
- There are many copyrights. As music software with the most copyrights, most songs on the market can be heard, especially for some singers such as Jay Chou, who are copyrighted by QQ Music. If you want to listen to his songs, you can only choose QQ Music.
- The interface design is beautiful. All elements use rounded corners, which is more visually pleasing.
- shortcoming
- More ads. When entering the software, there is a 5s advertisement. In addition, in the subsequent use of the software, even the cover of the song will sometimes become an advertisement. This makes some people who hate advertisements (such as me) feel disgusted.
- Too many irrelevant functions. Such as short videos, live broadcasts, pets, etc. In fact, we just want to listen to songs, and don't pay special attention to these irrelevant functions. These functions make the software too large and affect the user experience.
- Something too fancy. For example, dynamic effects and singer videos in personalization are all enabled by default, which is not a good experience for new users.
Suggestions for improvement
- The function of listening together can add some interactive functions to enhance the user experience.
- Strengthen the resources of English radio stations. Many users want to learn spoken English or improve their English ability in music software. They can cooperate with TED or other well-known English channels.
- Some overly personalized functions are turned off by default, allowing users to explore and find their favorite functions, instead of allowing new users to turn on many personalized functions by default when they are new to the software and are not familiar with the software.
- Appropriately increase the size of the button for skipping ads and reduce the frequency of ads.
bug description
Before explaining the bug, first classify the bugs according to the recurrence rate and user experience: Experience evaluation)
| grading | Recurrence rate and user experience |
|---|---|
| ⭐ | The recurrence rate is extremely low, and the impact on users is minimal |
| ⭐⭐ | High recurrence rate, less impact on users |
| ⭐⭐⭐ | Fully reproducible, with little impact on user usage |
| ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | The recurrence rate is high and has a great impact on user usage |
| ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | It is completely reproducible and has a great impact on user usage |
Lyrics search results are not clickable
-
Test environment: Windows11 QQ Music 18.59
-
Probability of recurrence: completely reproducible
-
Steps to reproduce:
- Search for anything with lyrics
- View the results, put the mouse on the song name, the song name turns green, and the mouse becomes a click gesture (meaning that this place should be clickable)
- Nothing happens after clicking, and the song cannot be played even if double-clicked
-
Description of the problem:
Generally speaking, when the mouse hovers over the text, the text changes color and the mouse becomes a click gesture, the user will think that this is a clickable button, but there is no response after clicking here. In addition, for this kind of For song search results, users will directly double-click to play the search results. In this interface, double-clicking cannot start playing. The only way to play is to click the very small play button on the right side of the song. For users, the experience is obviously extremely poor. Compared with other search interfaces (such as directly searching for song names), we can find that there is a big difference between the two interfaces. In the following interface, the song name is not a button, and you only need to double-click anywhere in this column to play.
-
Bug analysis:
I think there are two reasons for the bug:
1. The display of the song name uses the same interface as the following singer and album, but the corresponding jump is not set up, so the song name looks clickable, but Nothing happens when clicked.
2. In order to display the lyrics, this interface uses a different UI from the song search, and the previous double-click function has not been re-implemented here, so this place cannot be double-clicked -
Seriousness of the bug
In terms of system functions, the implementation of the lyrics search function here is not perfect. Although the security will not have a great impact on the user, the user experience is extremely poor, and the inability to click or double-click to play may make the user mistakenly think that this is a bug. It is a computer problem (such as a network problem that cannot play). Since it is completely reproducible and has a great impact on user experience, I think this bug can be rated as ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐. -
Anticipation and improvement suggestions for bugs
Add corresponding jumps, such as clicking to automatically jump to the song playing page and start playing, double-clicking to start playing but not jumping to the song playing page. -
Bug feedback:
in conclusion
Based on the above analysis, analyze from the following dimensions:
| dimension | specific situation | Score |
|---|---|---|
| basic function | The basic music functions are complete, and the basic functions such as song playback and sharing are complete. But the recommendation function is not as good as NetEase Cloud Music | ❤️❤️❤️❤️ |
| Novel features | Provides the function of automatic score and the function of listening together, but the function is not perfect | ❤️❤️❤️❤️ |
| user experience | Some overly personalized functions affect the experience more, and there are more advertisements | ❤️❤️❤️ |
| Rich music library | There are many copyrights, but many are exclusive to members | ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ |
| beautiful interface | More beautiful, but some bells and whistles | ❤️❤️❤️❤️ |
Final score: d) Good, not bad
user interview
Here is an interview with my roommate lyd. As a user who often listens to music and uses both QQ Music and Netease Cloud Music, lyd has certain interview significance.
The following is our interview record:
It can be seen that lyd actually used Netease Cloud Music at the beginning, and finally found that Netease Cloud had many copyrights gone, so he switched to QQ Music. Although Netease Cloud Music’s recommendation mechanism is better, there is no copyright Probably can't recommend it either. So copyright actually determines whether some users continue to use the software.
Part Two Analysis
Using all the functions of this service, estimate how much time it will take for this software/website/service to achieve this level (about 6 people in the team, computer university graduates, and professional UI support).
- NetEase Cloud Music
| stage | time required |
|---|---|
| Demand research, product design | 2 weeks |
| Project prototype, UI design | 2 weeks |
| basic function code | 6 weeks |
| Basic Functional Test | 4 weeks |
| Additional function coding | 6 weeks |
| overall test | 6 weeks |
| Launch and perfect | 2 weeks |
| Software maintenance | Each quarter |
It takes a total of 28 weeks to complete.
- QQ Music
| stage | time required |
|---|---|
| Demand research, product design | 2 weeks |
| Project prototype, UI design | 2 weeks |
| basic function code | 6 weeks |
| Basic Functional Test | 4 weeks |
| Additional function coding | 8 weeks |
| overall test | 6 weeks |
| Launch and perfect | 2 weeks |
| Software maintenance | Each quarter |
It takes a total of 30 weeks to complete. Among them, I think QQ Music has some additional functions that are more fancy than NetEase Cloud, so it takes more time.
Analyze the current advantages and disadvantages of this software (compared with similar software), what is the estimated quality of this product among similar products?
From the perspective of Huawei App Market,
| software | Downloads | user rating |
|---|---|---|
| kugou music | 6.9 billion | 4.7 |
| QQ Music | 6.8 billion | 3.9 |
| NetEase Cloud Music | 5.1 billion | 2.7 |
From the ios app store, you can see the ranking changes of the three from Master Cicada:
In addition, you can see the forecast of downloads:
In summary, the ranking is roughly
- QQ Music
- NetEase Cloud Music
- kugou music
personal analysis
- QQ音乐
QQ音乐为腾讯旗下软件，占有市面上大部分版权，也基本达到了其垄断的目的，就我所知，有很多用户便是因为网易云没有版权而QQ音乐有版权才转到了QQ音乐，当然也有同时使用两者的用户，不过两边跑来跑去，真的不累吗？虽然QQ音乐版权非常多，但是其使用体验可能并不是非常好：时不时跳出来的广告、花里胡哨的特效、无意义的功能。正如腾讯开发的QQ，此时已经将虚幻引擎（一个游戏引擎）给塞进去了，安装包越来越大。QQ音乐也有如此发展的趋势，各种功能都往里加，似乎已经忘记了自己只是个听歌软件，大部分功能用户根本用不到。但是由于版权的原因，QQ音乐目前还是稳在第一的。 - 网易云音乐
网易云作为一开始的一个较小众的软件，颇有特色，但是在后面的版权大战中不敌腾讯的QQ音乐，这也导致了一部分的用户流失，不过用户基数还是较大的。面对各式各样的音乐软件，网易云的版权正逐渐被吞食，能否拿下更多的版权，在我看来是网易云后续能否继续发展的重点，另外网易云的开发人员貌似没有很听取用户的意见，在评论区可以看到大量的1星好评：私人FM怎么改成这样了，我之前没怎么用过该功能，但是看到大量这种评论，若排除水军的原因，那就是开发人员真的把之前的一个好功能改的面目全非了。在现在看来，网易云还是可以稳住第2的。
从各方面的问题，推理出这个软件团队在软件工程方面可以提高的一个重要方面(具体建议)。
- QQ音乐
适当精简自己的功能，把一些用户根本不需要的功能舍弃，另外将一些重要功能做的更加完善，提高软件的人性化使用体验。可以通过用户问卷的形式、用户使用功能的频率、次数、时间来判断该功能的重要性。 - 网易云音乐
多与用户交流，确定自己哪些功能是特别的（如心动模式），以这个核心功能为卖点，多多完善核心功能，而不是学其他软件，加入各种其他软件有的功能，这样只会在竞争中失去原有的优势。
你在第一部分发现的bug，为何软件团队不能在发布前修复？他们是不知道，还是有意不修复？你觉得是什么原因？
| bug | 原因 |
|---|---|
| 一起听多线程不同步 | 测试把关不严，敷衍了事，没有注意在特殊的配置或环境下测试 |
| 中英文适配不当 | 开发人员粗心大意 |
| 超长表情评论他人不可见 | 具体的设计质量不高 |
| 歌词搜索结果无法点击 | 开发人员粗心大意、对用户需求掌握不好 |
第三部分 建议和规划
市场概况
市场大小
从易观分析上可以看到中国的音乐市场规模仍然在上升期。目前已达到了742.3亿元。
用户分析
从用户上分析，2021年3月的月活人数已达到7.39亿。
其中大部分是年轻人，而我们知道听音乐实际上不只是年轻人的热爱，实际上也有老年人喜欢听歌，因此我认为老年人是一个很好的用户挖掘方向。
市场现状
目前市场上有什么样的产品了？
只看中国地区的产品的话，会发现实际上只有那么5家：QQ音乐、网易云音乐、酷狗音乐、咪咕音乐、酷我音乐。其他的用户量都不大，无法与前面5家相比。这5家中前3者占据了绝大部分的市场份额，因此下面仅对他们三者进行分析。
上述产品的定位、优势与劣势在哪里？
- QQ音乐
版权垄断者：版权绝对多，大部分版权都在QQ音乐手上，这也是其一大优势，但是其在用户体验上还需加强。 - 网易云音乐
社区活跃者：非常活跃的音乐社区，以此吸引了很多音乐人，但是目前其版权越来越少，是一大劣势。 - 酷狗音乐
资源积累者：多年的音乐软件资源积累，是最早开始的音乐软件之一，但是其业务较少，功能较单薄，社区不如网易云活跃。
上述产品之间呈现什么样的关系，哪些为竞品关系？以及竞争中的各方态势如何？
上述产品实际上都是竞品关系，目前来看QQ音乐在版权大战中胜出，因此QQ音乐目前势头最佳，但是网易云音乐主要以小众用户为目标，针对青少年，目前排在第2，酷狗则貌似一直没有找到发力点，暂时排在第3.
市场与产品生态
这个产品的核心用户群是什么样的人？是什么样的？学历，年龄，专业，爱好，收入，表面需求，潜在需求都是什么？
从用户分布上来看，年轻人为典型用户，而其中中等以上消费人群占了50%以上，用户消费能力总体非常强。用户也集中在沿海发达地区，我推测他们的需求是在学业或工作之余听歌缓解压力，当然也有对音乐非常地热爱，想与他人交流的需求。
产品的用户群体之间是否存在一定的关系？是否有利用其相互作用二次构成特定用户生态的可能性？
存在一定的关系，比如有一些喜欢交友的人群，有一些喜欢听歌的人群，他们可以通过一起听这个新功能匹配，一起交流音乐。又如有些人对短视频感兴趣，一些人则会用他们喜欢的歌曲去制作短视频的背景音乐，这便形成了一些非常喜欢短视频音乐的群体。
产品的子产品，以及其他相关产品之间是否存在一定的关系？是否有利用各个产品特性之间的相互关系二次构成产品生态的可能性？
存在。比如网易云之前有和抖音合作“热歌改造计划”项目，一起探讨挖掘短视频与音乐结合的可能。又如酷我音乐在车载应用上与车企合作，提供高质量的车载音乐。
产品规划
新功能
歌曲弹幕功能。
- Need 需求
我们在使用一些视频网站如b站时，会看到有意思的弹幕。而网易云用户与b站用户实际上有很大的相似度，都是年轻人群体，因此在也，用户使用网易云听音乐时也有发送弹幕和看弹幕的需求。 - Approach 做法
在歌曲播放页加入一个弹幕，当有人在听这首歌时，可发送弹幕，假如此时有其他人也在同时听这首歌，那么同时听的人都可以看到这个弹幕。为了提高用户的体验 - Benefit Benefits
Users can see the real-time barrage sent by other users in real time, which can make users feel the atmosphere that someone is listening to songs with them, which can strengthen the empathy between users and increase the activity of the community. In addition, this is the same mechanism as station b, although the barrage is for music, which is both familiar and novel to users. It can also attract some users of station b to use NetEase Cloud to experience the music version of "station b". - Competitors Competition
At present, it is not known which music software has implemented this function. QQ Music and Kugou Music do not have this function. In addition, Netease Cloud itself has the best community attributes, and the comments and exchanges are very active. Adding a new community method on NetEase Cloud should have more advantages than the other two. - Delivery promotion
can cooperate with station b to attract users of station b or other users who like barrage to use Netease cloud music.
role configuration
| Role | number of people |
|---|---|
| Front-end development | 2 |
| backend development | 2 |
| test | 1 |
| artist | 1 |
detailed planning
| Week | Task |
|---|---|
| 1~2 | Demand research, competitive product analysis, target determination |
| 3~4 | UI design, determine the structure, build the development environment, improve the requirements, and formulate the alpha phase plan |
| 5~9 | Alpha stage development, in which there are 2 front-end and back-end people, who can conduct code mutual review, and testers are responsible for front-end and back-end testing |
| 10 | Alpha stage summary and alpha version product release, make beta stage plan |
| 11~14 | Beta stage development, in which there are two front-end and back-end people, who can conduct code mutual review, and testers are responsible for front-end and back-end testing |
| 15 | Beta version public testing, collecting and improving user opinions |
| 16 | Officially launched, continue to improve and maintain the project |