1. Red core events
August 16, claiming to "break the monopoly of the United States, China's first independent innovation intelligent browser kernel" and get the red core browser 350 million of financing, users found to be "just Google browser to change a layer of skin."
2. My point of view
1. Holding semi-finished products or ppt, under the banner of patriotism and innovation to deceive the white government and enterprises, to flicker gold master father. Some people voted is a good thing, no one voted for him did not lose. And this does cause a certain degree of technological innovation to hit China, by Fudge able to get money, how many people continue to adhere to innovation. You say you hit security, as an ordinary university student knows that when coupled with a request to initiate token, red core gave a detailed code comments, people will find out whether your processes do the project?
2. Complex open source code with modifications to improve on this basis, that is standing on the shoulders of giants innovation, overall borrowed then it's no innovation, let alone independent, at least to make their own improvements. If the red core as an ordinary browser, and the name of the independent banner that is cheating.
3. Software companies, software engineers, not for their own gain, but to give up their professional ethics, responsible for the user rather than to flicker.
4. Good code comments need to be addressed only important place, it is important interface, etc., rather than overall comments (you are the release), enterprise-class development is it white face? In many cases it makes clear naming convention will be able to reduce redundant code.
5. For innovation we still have to support, not to be denied, long way to go. step by step.
3. I agree with the view
1. True innovation requires courage to break the routine, to do the unprecedented things.
2. Extreme redundancy code and the Notes, did not look like a regular company developed, it may be just to get money.
3. Technology can not take it easy, step by step, rather than blow
4. Make your own code storytelling (I think it is a naming convention)
