[Daylight] qualitative academic papers abbreviation abstract wording

For most of the authors of the study qualitative terms, abbreviations suggest that you take the wording of the summary, there are two reasons, first, the abbreviations abstract wording put forward by me, so of course, such an approach to promote their own proposed ; second, such an approach can meet the requirements of most journals, we first whether quantitative research as well as the wording of the natural sciences, humanities and social sciences say that qualitative research can be used abbreviations summary in nature, it can meet the requirements of most journals. Conversely, if we write a summary report or summary of indicative, there will be about a third of the journals will not object, because the summary appears first person, but if we write is an abbreviation summary, there is no editing will object that this is a lot of people I communicate with the process, usually I will also examine the journal, read a summary of the changes required by many journals, such as a summary of the journal seven or eight years continuous change, many journals are moving abbreviations abstract direction to move closer. Some high-level authors also been aware of this problem and began to take the initiative to write abbreviated summary, for us, we have to try to do the relevant training.

As the name suggests, abbreviated summary of the content of the paper is not introduced, but the acronym for the content of the paper. It stands to reason, the key to this concept should be better to reverse, but do down a few years, I found that when I speak. We heard very clear, but the actual writing became a problem, though has clearly told you a summary of abbreviations is good, but a lot of it was to change, however. Everyone will have their own memories of what the abbreviation In high school, it may make you put 2,000 words abbreviated as 300 words, we have done such training in a language lesson, we will think about was written in doing abbreviation " In this paper it "? The acronym is not a description of the content of the paper, the content of the paper does not need to introduce what, a summary is a small independent essay, paper and some information, the summary where there are just some things do not have the details on the summary, but subjectivity information are put in the summary. Written in this way can digest more presents this summary is a small independent essay, more suitable for the qualitative study authors, this summary is no person, because it is not a description of the contents of the paper.

Abbreviation abstract question paper type, generally have the following elements, the research background, research questions, explain the problem, suggestions, suggestions if you do not write it, write impact of the problem, then there are research value. Elements from the point of view, it is a summary of the first two categories freak type very similar. Based on different research questions raised way, we look at two specific wording of the first, the reverse research questions, and we look at an example.
Here Insert Picture Description
"In the institutional environment Scientific Research in Teaching", which is a research background, "some schools teaching skills contest hope that through this initiative, to enhance the teaching ability of teachers, but lead to cope with the situation," the first phrase is positive, after turn carried out the last part, because the content is the opposite of the content of the paper, this is the author to write the contents of the first phrase is a normal, or that is a situation that most people have of turning back the author a study by the opposite problem to get out of a normal situation. Before, we talked about the big topics are not afraid of big, small little afraid, afraid of the sort, so the location should be the topic of a large circle at the intersection of circle and meso level, as well as a small circle and meso level Interchange, these two topics should be location. So, if the paper is written in many schools actively organize teaching skills competition, in order to enhance the teaching ability of teachers, which belongs to the meso-level topics, there is nothing new, because we are doing so. Like the authors of this paper do not write this, he wrote that in this context, there is a problem or a phenomenon occurs, most of the teachers are not prepared to actively participate in the competition, both in dealing with this is he found a phenomenon, which ask questions, and the first positive account, and then in turn account for what they write. After the issue came out, followed by necessary to explain the problem, the problem is how did it? Section corresponding to that paper cause analysis, the authors say, " 'cope' phenomenon is both a product of institutional discipline, but also gave birth to the direction of institutional change." This sentence may have a lot of words in the paper, the authors put it concentrates became a word, the paper probably from the disciplinary system, as well as the trend of institutional change several ways, analysis of the causes, reasons or that it reached a preliminary analysis section of small conclusion, the question is why would produce ? After the problem is to explain suggestions, some question the impact of different papers are not the same, "Any attempt aimed at the design of the system and change ...... should learn to cope with the hidden wisdom, out of respect ...... ...... for teachers autonomy organizations play the role of a sufficient contribution. "this is to advise of this matter. Compared with the report summary, we may find that their content is actually almost as well as so few, but the writing is very different. How can the more successful the idea to write a summary of abstract acronym up? To completely forgot reports of summary writing, learning from the outset abbreviation abstract wording, because what the concept is not so easy to change. From paper to everyone counseling experience, I feel that at least 60% of the people on the summary to modify three or more times, I might guess

Second place, direct research questions, that is, the opposite does not need to explain the problem, what the problem is directly accountable paper, this type of multi-around some "contradictions", "dispute" or the "dilemma" such as the use of so it can be presented directly to the question. If we have just teaching skills competition this problem to cope with direct questioning way to write, how to write? Then we have to find contradictions in it place or inside plight. We have to change the language of logic, the current development Teaching Skills Competition, caught in a dilemma. What this dilemma is? Everyone is payable, then down to connect the logic of the original, and this is not it also possible? This is the logic of research questions directly. Let's look at an example of "theory generally have time famine leisure society - The new middle class Perspective":

Here Insert Picture Description
Generally the leisure society, which is its background, the background is a word sometimes, but sometimes it make it highly condensed into a sentence elements, even condensed into one word, such as universal leisured society. In fact, if we look at the paper, then, there is widespread discussion of a free society is that most of the thesis, but because it is part of a background, not the content of published articles, so it directly to the author curling up in a word , which did not start, there are abbreviations question of detail, the focus is to explain these two aspects of research issues and problems, these two links are links must write, can not write research object, you can no suggestions, but these two parts two abbreviated summary of the link will be written. So, how widespread the leisured society? There is a contradiction, is the free time of unprecedented growth and a shortage of free time time famine that is contradictory. Many people feel that the revenue raised, logically, it should have more time to travel, to engage in leisure activities, but in fact is more and more busy, the authors write such a phenomenon. There are two points embodied this contradiction, abuse or squeeze free time free time, so far, to put forward the issue of the paper. Then we should explain the problem, why is there so many problems? In value level is mainly due to the invasion of consumerism, it is due to lack of human value of this system at the institutional level, this is the cause of the problem analysis section. So what should I do? Only on the basis of the continued sound system, launched a comprehensive awareness of the value of leisure time and, in order to more effectively address the new middle class of the time famine. Finally, put forward suggestions. We look at the way this paper direct questions, the author has put forward directly up a contradiction, then why is there this contradiction? Direct proposed such a logic. We can not put it into a reverse logic of the issues raised, it is possible, for example, the leisure society in general, everyone's income improves, intuitively, personal conditions have free time should be getting better, but the actual situation is not the case, the conditions for the pursuit of freedom has become increasingly diverse, but less and less free time, by turn, becomes a reverse logic questions, we write when you can go flexibility processing, direct manner the issues raised issues raised with the reverse can be converted, if we find that their papers can not be converted, that your topic is problematic, because a good topic, always in writing not a normal thing, that is, your problem is not positive and negative, such as the role of certain research, the impact of a to B, these topics have birth defects, because you do not explore the opposite problem, we all know are exploring East West, are some of the meso-level stuff, do not give strangeness. Engage in literary study of people, when they write literary criticism or artistic comment, if in writing throughout all good works, first how good, how good the second, third, how good, this is not negative, it is throughout this is a good work, at most, there may be written on the last one, this work is a little wrong, and did not dare to write. In fact, the problems works out to write an academic paper is a topic, any topic is a good writing is not a normal thing. For example, write preschool teacher, wrote his gender imbalance; write uniforms, wrote his neutral.

Guess you like

Origin blog.csdn.net/qq1377005839/article/details/93387079