Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) represent a powerful class of deep neural network architectures. In an increasingly interconnected world, most information can be modeled as a graph because of its connectivity. For example, the atoms in a compound are nodes and the bonds between them are edges.
The beauty of graph neural networks is their ability to directly operate on graph-structured data without sacrificing important details. This is especially evident when dealing with complex datasets such as chemical compounds, where GNNs allow us to take full advantage of the richness of the underlying graph representation. By doing so, GNNs are able to gain a more complete understanding of the relationships between atoms and bonds, opening avenues for more accurate and in-depth analyses.
Outside of chemistry, the influence of graph structures extends to different fields. Take transportation data as an example, where cities are nodes and routes between them are edges. GNNs have proven invaluable in tasks such as traffic jam prediction, demonstrating their effectiveness in capturing the complex dynamics of urban mobility. The ability of GNNs to grasp the spatial dependencies and patterns inherent in graph data becomes a powerful tool when faced with challenges such as predicting traffic congestion. Numerous models based on GNN have become the most advanced solutions for predicting traffic congestion, becoming the most cutting-edge models. The following is a model for predicting traffic jams on paperswithcode, basically all GNN
This article will introduce the theoretical basis of graph convolution. By delving into the complexity of the graph Fourier transform and its connection to graph convolutions, we will lay the groundwork for a deep understanding of this key concept in the GNN world.
How to define graph convolution
The core concept of GNN is graph convolution, which realizes effective processing of graph data by capturing the relationship between nodes and edges.
Among the various methods of understanding graph convolution, this article focuses on using the theory of graph Fourier transform to explain. This concept provides a unique insight into the mechanism of graph convolution.
The graph Fourier transform allows us to represent graph signals—data associated with nodes—in terms of graph frequencies. This decomposition, based on spectral analysis, provides insight into the underlying patterns and structures in the graph.
Some GNN architectures utilize attention mechanisms and other advanced methods that go beyond the scope of graph convolutions. But we mainly discuss the nature of graph convolution and its interaction with graph Fourier transform, so the attention and other parts are out of the scope of this paper
What is Graph Fourier Transform?
The concept of the Fourier transform of a graph has interesting similarities to the classical Fourier transform. Just as the traditional Fourier transform decomposes a wave signal into its constituent frequencies, the graph Fourier transform operates on graph-structured data, revealing the frequencies of the signal embedded within it.
Imagine a weighted undirected graph with no cycles or multiple edge structures. The Fourier transform of a graph is a mathematical operation that emphasizes the transformation of the signal present on the graph. This concept becomes particularly illustrative in the case of signal dimensions equal to one. Consider the following description, which depicts what a signal looks like on a chart [1].
Decomposing a signal into its frequency graph, or graph Fourier transform, provides a way to identify the various relationships, regularities, and complexities inherent in graph data.
Graph Laplacian
To understand the Fourier transform of a graph, we'll start with a basic exploration, first introducing the Laplace transform of a graph. This key concept is the cornerstone for revealing the intrinsic frequency properties of graphs.
The graph Laplacian is denoted as L and defined as:
In this equation, A denotes the adjacency matrix, which encodes the connections between nodes in the graph, and D denotes the degree matrix, which captures the degree of each node.
Since D and A are real symmetric matrices, the graph Laplacian matrix also has the properties of real symmetric matrices. This property allows us to perform a spectral decomposition of the graph Laplacian function, expressed as:
In the above formula, U represents the eigenvector matrix, and Λ is a diagonal matrix composed of eigenvalues (Λ 1, Λ 2, ..., Λ n).
Quadratic
This section explains the quadratic form and quadratic shape of a Laplacian graph, and how it relates to the frequency of the graph signal.
The quadratic form of a graph Laplacian can be defined as:
Here f represents the graph signal, w represents the weight of an edge, and Nk represents the set of nodes connected to node k.
This representation reveals two fundamental key aspects:
smoothness of the function
Quadratic forms provide insight into the graphical smoothness of functions. Consider the scenario where f = [1,1,1,...,1]T. By the definition of the graph Laplacian, the quadratic form evaluates to zero. That is, the smoother the function is across nodes, the smaller the resulting quadratic form. This interaction provides a mechanism to quantify the degree of inherent smoothness of graph signals.
Similarity Between Neighboring Nodes
The quadratic form is also used as a metric to evaluate the similarity between signals on neighboring nodes. When the difference between f(i) and f(j) is large, the corresponding quadratic value increases proportionally. Conversely, if the signals on adjacent nodes are similar, the quadratic form approaches zero. This observation is consistent with the idea that larger values of quadratic form reflect greater variation between adjacent nodes.
With these concepts in place, quadratic forms can be interpreted as a graphical substitute for the "frequency" of the function. By using it to provide information, we can perform a graphical signal decomposition based on frequency components. This crucial step is the precursor to the graph Fourier transform, unlocking a powerful way to reveal frequency features embedded in graph-structured data.
Graph Fourier Transform
We have established the quadratic shape of the Laplacian plot as an indicator of signal frequency, where larger quadratic shape values indicate higher frequencies. One more important point: be aware that these values may be affected by the norm of f. To ensure consistency and remove potential effects of different norms, we also need to impose the constraint that the norm of f is equal to 1.
In order to obtain the stationary value of the quadratic form under the norm condition, we use the Lagrange multiplier method, a powerful optimization technique. Appropriately transforming the problem, we finally get an eigenvalue problem:
This eigenvalue provides a relation: each eigenvalue of L reflects the value of the quadratic form of the graph Laplacian. Simply put, these eigenvalues capture the frequencies at which the graphic signal vibrates.
This gives us a basic understanding of eigenvalues as indicators of the frequency of a function. The connection between the eigenvectors and the graph Laplacian becomes the way to perform the graph Fourier transform—a process that systematically reveals the intrinsic frequency elements of the graph signal.
Now, we can look at the definition of the Fourier transform
From graph Fourier transform to graph convolution
With the graph Fourier transform introduced above, we obtain a powerful tool for efficiently analyzing and processing graph signals. In our study the connection between graph Fourier transform and graph convolution.
At the heart of this connection is the convolution theorem, which establishes the connection between the convolution operation and the element-wise product in the Fourier domain.
The convolution operation is similar to the element-wise multiplication of the transformed signal in the Fourier domain. An indirect definition of graph convolution can be derived using the convolution theorem:
- Performs a Fourier transform on a graphics signal.
- Multiply the transformed signal with a learnable weight vector.
- Perform an inverse Fourier transform on the element-wise product to obtain the output of the graph convolution.
The formula for graph convolution can now be expressed as follows:
To make this definition more streamlined, we introduce a utility parameterization. Since the element product with U f can be expressed as the product with diag(U f), s, the learnable weight θ is set as:
By exploiting this parameterization, gθ's graph convolution formulation adopts a simplified and intuitive form:
Look, we've defined a graph convolution from the Fourier transform of a graph!
Summarize
In this paper, we start by revealing the basic principles of graph Laplacian, and then delve into the basic concept of graph convolution, which is the derivation of graph Fourier transform.
The inferences made in this article should deepen your understanding of the nature of graph convolution. We will introduce the message passing mechanism of the graph in more detail later, because it can aggregate the information of adjacent nodes, which is the key to the success of graph convolution.
Quote:
[1] D. I. Shuman et al., “The Emerging Field of Signal Processing on Graphs: Extending High-Dimensional Data Analysis to Networks and Other Irregular Domains”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 30(3):83–98, 2013
https://avoid.overfit.cn/post/dbcee95a7b8444e8b5f0e0925ec66332
Author: Lalf