Self-media people angrily criticize WeChat's "mutual selection advertisement" for violating the rules

I'm Lu Songsong, click on the profile picture above, welcome to follow me!

Yesterday, the self-media person Mao Erxia angrily denounced WeChat's "mutual selection advertisement" for violating the rules, Tencent lost its bottom line, and said that WeChat was phishing to enforce the law.
insert image description here

The general idea is this: Mao Erxia posted a soft advertisement on its official account. Due to the implementation of the "Internet Advertising Law", Tencent requires that all advertising content must go to the "mutually selected advertising platform" to receive orders. This advertisement is Tencent's official The platform checks and audits itself. Mao Erxia accepted this advert based on his trust in the official. As a result, after Mao Erxia posted the advertisement, WeChat blocked its official account because of the following reasons: spam advertisements, suspected of excessive marketing, and harassment of users.

insert image description here

After Mao Erxia published the "angry article", WeChat revoked its punishment, but the official account was still blocked. WeChat reminder: This account has excessive marketing and harassment of users, and all articles on the account are prohibited from sharing.
insert image description here

Immediately afterwards, other people in the group (Zeus Ye Meng) also said: I am really angry. I just blocked my account with 200,000 fans. The article is fine. I was blocked for one year for no reason, and then I got a new insight. Under the big name, Liu Sandao wrote the original for three years, more than 200,000 fans blocked it for a year, and the new insight was blocked again. After several years of hard work, everyone knows how to get over it, and it really collapsed.

Zeus Ye Meng also said: That is not an advertisement, but an original article, which will be processed in May. Two months later, he was suddenly reminded and dealt with again. He was banned for one year and basically sentenced to death. The criminal law does not dare to deal with the matter repeatedly, and Tencent's title is too casual.

In addition, some netizens said: The blocked official account is called "Xindongcha". It sounds like a social commentary. ?Before I cooperated with an account owner, I sent a Li Jiaqi tank cake incident, which was directly banned forever.
insert image description here

This type of content on WeChat is actually very difficult to define. Mizuki Fengyun said: It is easy to suffer from negative social news. It is best to sing praises with positive energy.

Write at the end:

I originally wanted to say a few more words, but after thinking about it, forget it, one thing more is worse than one thing less.

Article source: Lu Songsong blog, welcome to follow my account!

Guess you like

Origin blog.csdn.net/lssbk/article/details/131593562