Many users can't understand, why choose real-time cloud rendering instead of using a local computer for rendering and display? This article will compare the advantages and disadvantages of the two modes through various aspects, and help you understand real-time cloud rendering and local rendering more comprehensively.
1. Comparison of portability
Since the GPU requires space in the chassis, local rendering often requires carrying a heavy server workstation to the site to pull the wires and deploy in advance, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive.
3DCAT real-time cloud rendering only needs a thin and light handheld terminal or notebook device to play video smoothly, reduce equipment investment, and provide powerful cloud service functions for enterprises or individuals. Future technologies replace traditional implementations.
2. Cost comparison
Local rendering needs to purchase expensive equipment, high-end computing power products need to invest more than 10,000 yuan, and real-time rendering in the cloud only needs a few yuan to tens of yuan per hour to own cloud 3D Rendering service, 3DCAT and real-time streaming to user terminals, do not need to worry about hardware, network and other IaaS layers, and do not need to pay attention to resource scheduling and technology implementation PaaS layer, easily win at the starting line of cost advantage.
Some project applications are constantly updated, and the volume is getting bigger and bigger. Computing resources need to be upgraded. Local rendering faces the risk of equipment obsolescence, while cloud rendering provides low-end, mid-range, and high-end graphics card solutions, which can be seamlessly expanded and upgraded to high-end graphics cards. On the equipment, there is no need to eliminate the old equipment, and 0 additional depreciation costs are considered.
3. Comparison of collaboration capabilities
Local download and installation or loading models through WEB plug-ins to achieve rendering, multi-person collaboration capabilities are weak, and the program needs to support additional data synchronization functions to interact with the same screen. However, 3DCAT real-time cloud rendering only needs to transmit the push stream to other devices to realize multi-person interaction on the same screen, increasing the convenience of collaboration.
4. Picture quality comparison
The current network is no longer a flaw that restricts the picture quality. 3DCAT self-developed streaming and encoding compression technology supports up to 4K + 120 FPS, which is almost the same as the local supported parameters. High resolution provides clear Excellent picture quality and high FPS allow smooth and free exchange of 3D applications. Combining 5G and gigabit bandwidth, it brings users an immersive visual experience. 3DCAT fully supports advanced features such as NVIDIA ray tracing, which is a feature that local low-end GPU devices cannot ignore.
V. Comparison of Physical Stability
Customers often complain that local deployments are prone to natural disasters such as fire and flood damage, as well as man-made physical damage, or malfunction of heat dissipation leading to crashes, which will have a devastating impact on business. 3DCAT cloud real-time rendering servers are all placed in data centers with high industry standards, with T3+ grades, passed the international ISO certification, have an earthquake-resistant structure above grade 9, and provide year-round operation and maintenance services. The cabinets of the node machines are solid, and physical factors will not Affecting user business, customers do not need to worry about the tedious work of operation and maintenance in the computer room.
By comparing several aspects of cloud real-time rendering and local rendering, we can find the unique features and advantages of this future technology owner, and provide analysis and suggestions for customers when it is difficult to choose one or the other. 3DCAT will also In the future, we will help more applications to use the cloud well.