I choose the composition questions in Shanghai in 2023 (I am more interested), and the topics are as follows:
Faced with this topic, do you have any ideas? If you were to take the test, how would you write it?
Come, let's see how AI is written.
The following is the composition of GPT-4, please enjoy it:
I will first describe my overall experience, and then analyze it in detail.
I have just one feeling: I maintain the basic judgment of AI capabilities 4 months ago, that is, " both strengths and weaknesses are extremely obvious ."
Let's talk about the advantages first, the full text 非常顺畅, not only 有条理, 有举证but more importantly 有层次! When I was still thinking about what angles to talk about this issue besides curiosity, GPT gave me the answer in a few seconds:
"A person is willing to explore a strange world, not just because 好奇心, but also 求知欲, 实现自我价值, and 社会责任感"
Enlightenment, my friends!
I don’t know if you have thought of so many angles, anyway, I can’t think of them in such a short time, it’s amazing!
The key is that these 4 factors are progressive !
"Curiosity" is still 动物性 in the " 本我" stage, "curiosity" is possessed 人性, stepping into " 自我", "self-realization" is a further "self", and when it comes to "social responsibility", it will directly reach beyond the boundary of " 超我".
Great!
This is what I said, it is not only well-written, but also progressive, this is too exaggerated, it can be said to easily surpass 99% of ordinary people.
Okay, rainbow fart is over, so let me talk about the shortcomings or disadvantages.
In fact, I have already expressed the relevant views once in the previous article, you can click this to read: "ChatGPT that can't make mistakes is meaningless" .
Again, GPT is trained on the data of adults, and the data of adults is extremely logical, and because of this, GPT is best at logical deduction, and its expression is also very logical (so it can layer layer progression).
But, things with strong logic naturally lack human beauty, romance and irrational imagination .
denied? OK, let me prove it to you.
In order to test whether GPT has more possibilities and write the article more artistically, I changed the question:
Oh hoo, rollover. Except for a slight change in the title, the rest of the content is almost completely unchanged.
Well, you may want to say that you are asking the wrong question. OK, let me ask another question:
It still doesn't work, it's still the rhetoric and expression of strong logic, I am very disappointed, it doesn't understand my literature and art.
Perhaps it is true that I am asking the wrong question, but I still firmly believe that AI is still just a cold machine in front of the brilliance of human nature , at least for now.
Well, this article is just a tentative discussion. For more discussions on AI and human nature, you can read my previous articles: