Sometimes experience is the double-edged sword
Division of work
According laid down before the $ 399 price, we run for 3 months, how did the loss, but hardly earned. (In fact, the loss was calculated way, there have been problems)
at that time that, they do not lose money on the book, and bring in enough money to pay rent, that is no loss, have balance and that is profit.
Although no loss, but three people feel that this is not the way to go, why do?
First, close to the students, only a few hundred dollars each, the class fee is too low not to simply ask the teacher, if they teach, even my previous level of charges are not, I feel a bit tasteless.
Of course, at the beginning or their religion, most of the students are assigned to teach me. Here that role at the beginning of the distribution of small J:
- I am responsible for teaching
- Q small charge of publicity (offline + online), websites and copywriting class
- J mainly small organizations planning activities
A start that small Q will shoot and do copy, I was quite satisfied with this partner. Maybe it is not how art since childhood, I grew to artists, photographers, art students who would like to see a little higher, and my heart will give birth to a similar respect for the meaning of the police like it. So small Q advertise no comments, even a little flattering representation of small Q I would like to study art and the like, although I will programming, but art, photography, layout has been my heart.
But only for small organizations do not agree with the J, J because of the small teaching experience more than I, had been a teacher before working in the piano.
At the time I was only a little eye-view, piano everyday teaching, rather than planning.
Of course, this is no absolute right or wrong, it should be said when teaching is not so much time, no need to say a person independent specialize in planning, teaching ability is wasted.
Only a small J himself said he did not want to let him years of teaching in teaching, at least it is possible to him that he would organize the party to do some drainage work rather than pure teaching.
I did not know how to refute.
But I feel a bit helpless, because thought I care deeply about an organization wants to do in the future will also make themselves feel sick, but do not want to participate in some of these links?
The fact that I will not be back this way, at least so far I have not tired of teaching
J is small but fairly easy to discuss who immediately said, and asked him to teach can also be, at least initially, not many students did not need to please people, and I was taught by him on the first bar.
Here that a point that we began distribution of work is a pure distribution, teaching is no class fee.
According to the idea of small J, one of us is not necessary to do something similar wages, something the commission, because that will turn to their own wages, very strange.
I have no idea, because do not know how to be a better form.
Now I would be more inclined to have a partner wages and take the form of commission, but would not say this is more appropriate
I remember the first meeting of the organization, there are probably 15-20 people to attend, one of a guitar lessons learned in other parts of the girls to play the red sang a song, a look at the situation is basically just learning, potholes the bomb is over.
Later small J told me that the girls want to pull this occupation, she opened the piano before the opening of the very good, but trouble broke up with her boyfriend so I did not continue to open.
In addition to the aid of her experience, it'll also let her put some money in, shares aspects, like give her 10 points.
Besides lower here, because this open piano, I have not completely left, belong to work in the company, after work and on weekends to a part-time basis.
So for me there is no internal invested so much time a little advice, I made my own only 25% of the shares, but the investment money I was like everyone else, put 1/3.
This means that if just throw money do not make money, like everybody else. If you make money, I earn less, I only 1/4, 3/4 rest, I do not care how They divide.
Joined the red now, the shares to be reassigned.
Small Q mean, my share and then give some to her, for example, I accounted for 15%, 10% red, or me and her equally.
I disagree, because the lectures did not get the lesson fee, although come on time, but the credit is not too small, if all sit in this, even if for a long time, the contribution is not necessarily large.
There is also a summary of things:
In a team discussion, if differences of opinion, to explain their position, as long as the reason to make clear, does not have to attack others, or angry
This view was immediately Small Q No, and then I said three people before, I only 1/4, four people now, I can only 1/5.
So, I'm only one-fifth, as the red accounts for the number, the small J is how to talk to her, I do not know.
Now I think of this, then he should not feel easy concessions, at least let you know the equity allocation of the entire team, at least know how the other members probably constituted.
New Partners
After the little red came and two changes:
- Brought the money, the money to buy a piano, we are no longer only a couple of guitars
- Change our way of fees, with the red before the [success] Experience: 699 yuan / 16 lessons
This appears to increase the fees of 699 yuan, but essentially lower unit price, or based on my knowledge at the time, because they do not know what the charges more reasonable, it is not against the charges.
It was agreed by this new fee package.
But behind the operator allows us to recognize:
Sometimes the experience is also double-edged sword, elsewhere effective things in you that is not necessarily feasible.
However, I would like to say a more important thing:
Do not try, you never know what something is right for you
ps: I always felt writing articles does not look appealing, it is a question of style? Seek expert advice. . .