CTEC5805留学生作业代写、代做JAVA/C++程序语言作业、代写JAVA/C++课程设计作业
Faculty of Technology – Course work Specification 2018/19
Module name: Cyber Engineering
Module code: CTEC5805
Title of the Assignment: Coursework
This coursework item is: (delete as appropriate) Summative
This summative coursework will be marked anonymously Yes
The learning outcomes that are assessed by this coursework are:
1. Critically analyse various communication technologies for large building
environment
2. Designing and understanding of various communication engineering components
3. Capabilities to design a desired FM transmitter with the available resources
This coursework is: (delete as appropriate) Individual
If other or a mixed ... explain here:
This coursework constitutes 100% to the overall module mark.
Date Set: 12/10/18
Date & Time Due: 12/01/19 unless otherwise agreed
Your marked coursework and feedback will be
available to you on:
If for any reason this is not forthcoming by the due date your module
leader will let you know why and when it can be expected. The Head of
Studies should be informed of any issues relating to the return of
marked coursework and feedback.
Note that you should normally receive feedback on your coursework by
no later than 20 University working days after the formal hand-in
date, provided that you have met the submission deadline.
12/Feb/2019
When completed you are required to submit your coursework to:
1. Electronic copy to blackboard via Turnitin
If you need any support or advice on completing this coursework please visit the Student
Matters tab on the Faculty of Technology Blackboard page.
Late submission of coursework policy: Late submissions will be processed in accordance
with current University regulations which state:
“the time period during which a student may submit a piece of work late without authorisation and
have the work capped at 40% [50% at PG level] if passed is 14 calendar days. Work submitted
unauthorised more than 14 calendar days after the original submission date will receive a mark of 0%.
These regulations apply to a student’s first attempt at coursework. Work submitted late without
authorisation which constitutes reassessment of a previously failed piece of coursework will always
receive a mark of 0%.”
Word Limits
Maximum word limit: 3000 words. Where word limits are specified, answers can exceed
the word limit by up to 10% without penalty; then a penalty of 20% of the marks for
answers that exceed the word limit by up to 30%. The part of any answer that
exceeds the word limit by over 30% would not be marked and hence not contribute to
the final mark.
Academic Offences and Bad Academic Practices:
These include plagiarism, cheating, collusion, copying work and reuse of your own work, poor
referencing or the passing off of somebody else's ideas as your own. If you are in any doubt about
what constitutes an academic offence or bad academic practice you must check with your tutor.
Further information and details of how DSU can support you, if needed, is available at:
http://www.dmu.ac.uk/dmu-students/the-student-gateway/academic-support-office/academicoffences.aspx
and
http://www.dmu.ac.uk/dmu-students/the-student-gateway/academic-support-office/bad-academicpractice.aspx
Tasks to be undertaken:
1. Design and describe a single tuning circuit that can receive frequencies of 96MHz,
100MHz and 104MHz. What are the mechanisms to avoid the side channel noise and
improve the frequency selection? (25 MARKS)
2. Design and describe an indirect FM modulator to generate an FM carrier with the
carrier frequency of 96MHz and frequency deviation of 20KHz. A narrow band FM
generator with carrier frequency of 200KHz and adjustable frequency deviation in
the range of 9 to 10 Hz is available. The stock room also has an oscillator with
adjustable frequency in the range of 9 to 10MHz. There is a band pass filter with any
center frequency, and only frequency doublers are available. (25 MARKS)
3. Develop and describe a network communication model for any large building
application of your choice (educational institute or industry etc.) utilising at least two
different technologies among Bluetooth, GSM, RFID and CAN. (10 MARKS)
Develop a protocol for each of the following scenario along with its message scheduling
policy.
1. Identification of a person when enters into the building. (20 MARKS)
2. Handling an emergency scenario. (20 MARKS)
Note: The breakdown of 20 marks for each scenario in task 3 is:
10 Marks for protocol development and explanation,
5 marks for message scheduling diagram and
5 marks for message scheduling diagram explanation.
How the work will be marked:
See attached matrix
Module leader/tutor name: Dr Sarmadullah Khan
Contact details: [email protected]
% Fail 0..39 Fail 40..50 50..59 60..69 70..100
25
Completeness (detail description of tasks implementation with possible evidences e.g. simulation outputs, timing diagrams analysis
etc.)
Little to
no effort
shown
Work is missing large sections
Work has been completed to an
acceptable level but could have
been greatly expanded.
Some things have been missed
off that could have been
included or have not been
reported in real depth
Work has been completed to
a high standard, with some
work looked at in depth but
other section could have
been further built upon.
Work is fully complete. All
sections have been thought
out and described in detail.
35
Understanding (Implementations should meet the technical concepts)
Little to
no effort
shown
The report does not convey to the
reader that the student has
understood the concepts being
assessed.
The report shows some
understanding of the underlying
topics but the explanations are
somewhat lacking.
The report shows clear
understanding of the topic by
the student. Topics are
covered in depth and well
explained.
Excellent understanding of
the underlying topic is
displayed by the student.
Topic is comprehensively
covered and reasoned.
25
Critical analysis (e.g. why a specific component/technology is selected complete a task? What are its advantages over other
components or technologies? )
Little to
no effort
shown
Student has provided little to no
explanation for decisions made and
their implications.
Student has thought about the
discoveries/methodology used
and provides some explanation
behind decisions and their
implications within the scope of
the project.
Student demonstrates clear
critical analysis behind
decisions weighing up both
pro and cons before making
decisions. These decisions
are then reported and their
possible implications are than
Excellent critical analysis is
demonstrated. Decisions
have been well researched
and thought out. All
possible outcomes and their
security implications are
assessed and presented in
assessed. a clear and concise manner.
15
Style (Does reader easily understand the report)
Little to
no effort
shown
Report is poorly written and requires
significant goodwill on the part of
the reader.
References are poor, inconsistent or
out of date.
Report is written to an
acceptable standard with
sections clearly defined.
Requires some goodwill on the
part of the reader.
References are present but are
often inconsistent or out of date
Report is well written with
clear explanation of all
sections and requires little
goodwill on the part of the
reader.
References are consistent, up
to date and of good quality.
The report is excellently
written and enjoyable to
read.http://www.daixie0.com/contents/13/2329.html
References are complete and
of a high standard.
为专业，所以值得信赖。如有需要，请加QQ：99515681 或邮箱：[email protected]
微信：codinghelp