突然有一种感觉：真的是书读百遍题义自见呀。有空多看论文，顶级会议和期刊的论文多看，看过的有空了也翻出来细看。每次感想不一样！
【1】D'Angelo S , Gergle D . Gazed and Confused: Understanding and Designing Shared Gaze for Remote Collaboration[C]// Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2016.
ABSTRACT
People utilize eye gaze as an important cue for monitoring
attention and coordinating awareness. This study investigates how remote pairs make use of a graphical representation of their partner’s eye-gaze during a tightly-coupled
collaborative task. Our results suggest that reproducing
shared gaze in a remote collaboration setting makes pairs
more accurate when referring to linguistically complex objects by facilitating the production of efficient forms of
deictic references. We discuss how the availability of gaze
influences coordination strategies and implications for the
design of shared gaze in remote collaboration systems.
摘要一般都用一般现在式。
INTRODUCTION
引出本文的研究点，立论：
It is increasingly common to use Internet-based technologies such as video-mediated communication systems,
shared display groupware, and telepresence systems for
remote collaboration. Popular accounts of these systems
often portend the death of distance and promote notions of
equitable access to resources such as online education or
remote medical assessments. However, current scholarship
paints a more complex picture. Challenges arise when collaborative tools are developed without a thorough understanding of the ways in which groups coordinate their activities. For example, failure to consider the visual context of
an interaction can result in systems that impair a pair’s ability to establish mutual understanding and effectively collaborate。
this paper we examine shared gaze and its importance for
coordinating interaction. We explore the role it plays in attention and collaborative work, and examine its potential
as a design feature for remote collaboration systems.
THE CURRENT STUDY
论文的主要内容：In this paper we are interested in understanding how shared
gaze can be used as a collaborative resource, and we examine this in three different settings: co-located, remote with
shared gaze, and remote without shared gaze.
【2】D"Angelo S , Begel A . [ACM Press the 2017 CHI Conference - Denver, Colorado, USA (2017.05.06-2017.05.12)] Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, - CHI \"17 - Improving Communication Between Pair Programmers Using Shared Gaze Awareness[J]. 2017:6245-6290.
ABSTRACT
Remote collaboration can be more difficult than collocated
collaboration for a number of reasons, including the inability to easily determine what your collaborator is looking at.
This impedes a pair’s ability to efficiently communicate about
on-screen locations and makes synchronous coordination difficult. We designed a novel gaze visualization for remote pair
programmers which shows where in the code their partner is
currently looking, and changes color when they are looking at
the same thing. Our design is unobtrusive, and transparently
depicts the imprecision inherent in eye tracking technology.
We evaluated our design with an experiment in which pair
programmers worked remotely on code refactoring tasks. Our
results show that with the visualization, pairs spent a greater
proportion of their time concurrently looking at the same code
locations. Pairs communicated using a larger ratio of implicit
to explicit references, and were faster and more successful at
responding to those references.
