Spring Gateway 报错java.lang.IllegalStateException: COMPLETED 解决

今天测试网关请求时报错 报错信息如下

java.lang.IllegalStateException: COMPLETED
	at org.springframework.http.server.reactive.AbstractListenerReadPublisher$State.subscribe(AbstractListenerReadPublisher.java:451) ~[spring-web-5.3.15.jar:5.3.15]
	at org.springframework.http.server.reactive.AbstractListenerReadPublisher.subscribe(AbstractListenerReadPublisher.java:105) ~[spring-web-5.3.15.jar:5.3.15]
	at reactor.core.publisher.FluxSource.subscribe(FluxSource.java:67) ~[reactor-core-3.4.14.jar:3.4.14]
	at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.subscribe(Mono.java:4400) ~[reactor-core-3.4.14.jar:3.4.14]
	at reactor.netty.NettyOutbound.subscribe(NettyOutbound.java:336) [reactor-netty-core-1.0.15.jar:1.0.15]
	at reactor.core.publisher.MonoSource.subscribe(MonoSource.java:69) [reactor-core-3.4.14.jar:3.4.14]
	at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52) [reactor-core-3.4.14.jar:3.4.14]
	at reactor.netty.http.client.HttpClientConnect$HttpIOHandlerObserver.onStateChange(HttpClientConnect.java:424) [reactor-netty-http-1.0.15.jar:1.0.15]
	at reactor.netty.ReactorNetty$CompositeConnectionObserver.onStateChange(ReactorNetty.java:671) [reactor-netty-core-1.0.15.jar:1.0.15]
	at reactor.netty.resources.DefaultPooledConnectionProvider$DisposableAcquire.onStateChange(DefaultPooledConnectionProvider.java:183) [reactor-netty-core-1.0.15.jar:1.0.15]
	at reactor.netty.resources.DefaultPooledConnectionProvider$PooledConnection.onStateChange(DefaultPooledConnectionProvider.java:439) [reactor-netty-core-1.0.15.jar:1.0.15]
	at reactor.netty.channel.ChannelOperationsHandler.channelActive(ChannelOperationsHandler.java:62) [reactor-netty-core-1.0.15.jar:1.0.15]
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:230) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:216) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:209) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.CombinedChannelDuplexHandler$DelegatingChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelActive(CombinedChannelDuplexHandler.java:412) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter.channelActive(ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter.java:69) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.CombinedChannelDuplexHandler.channelActive(CombinedChannelDuplexHandler.java:211) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:230) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:216) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:209) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline$HeadContext.channelActive(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:1398) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:230) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelActive(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:216) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.fireChannelActive(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:895) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.nio.AbstractNioChannel$AbstractNioUnsafe.fulfillConnectPromise(AbstractNioChannel.java:305) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.nio.AbstractNioChannel$AbstractNioUnsafe.finishConnect(AbstractNioChannel.java:335) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKey(NioEventLoop.java:710) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeysOptimized(NioEventLoop.java:658) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeys(NioEventLoop.java:584) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:496) [netty-transport-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:986) [netty-common-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74) [netty-common-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30) [netty-common-4.1.73.Final.jar:4.1.73.Final]
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [na:1.8.0_211]

各种debug 测试断点。百度 谷歌都没能找到答案 

最终想起来说不是由于拦截器导致的 于是讲网关所有的拦截器 一个一个拿掉进行测试 最终定位到了问题

出问题的原因 代码如下:

package com.fuhang.mall.filter;

import com.fuhang.mall.constant.ConstantFilter;
import com.fuhang.mall.constant.OrderedConstant;
import lombok.extern.slf4j.Slf4j;
import org.springframework.cloud.gateway.filter.GatewayFilterChain;
import org.springframework.cloud.gateway.filter.GlobalFilter;
import org.springframework.core.Ordered;
import org.springframework.core.io.buffer.DataBufferUtils;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
import org.springframework.web.server.ServerWebExchange;
import reactor.core.publisher.Mono;

/**
 * @calssName AppCacheRequestBodyFilter
 * @Description 将 request body 中的内容 copy 一份,记录到 exchange 的一个自定义属性中
 * @Author jiangshaoneng
 * @DATE 2020/9/27 14:42
 */
@Component
@Slf4j
public class GlobalCacheRequestBodyFilter implements GlobalFilter, Ordered {

    @Override
    public Mono<Void> filter(ServerWebExchange exchange, GatewayFilterChain chain) {
        log.info("GlobalCacheRequestBodyFilter request body 缓存拦截器生效...");
        // 将 request body 中的内容 copy 一份,记录到 exchange 的一个自定义属性中
        Object cachedRequestBodyObject = exchange.getAttributeOrDefault(ConstantFilter.CACHED_REQUEST_BODY_OBJECT_KEY, null);
        // 如果已经缓存过,略过
        if (cachedRequestBodyObject != null) {
            return chain.filter(exchange);
        }
        // 如果没有缓存过,获取字节数组存入 exchange 的自定义属性中
        return DataBufferUtils.join(exchange.getRequest().getBody())
                .map(dataBuffer -> {
                    byte[] bytes = new byte[dataBuffer.readableByteCount()];
                    dataBuffer.read(bytes);
                    DataBufferUtils.release(dataBuffer);
                    return bytes;
                }).defaultIfEmpty(new byte[0])
                .doOnNext(bytes -> exchange.getAttributes().put(ConstantFilter.CACHED_REQUEST_BODY_OBJECT_KEY, bytes))
                .then(chain.filter(exchange));
    }
    @Override
    public int getOrder() {
        return OrderedConstant.RESP_ENCRYPT;
    }
}

可以看出我写了个全局缓存body内容的 拦截器 就是由于这个拦截器导致的 但是具体为何会出现这种问题 不得其解 有知道的大佬 请赐教一下 非常感谢 

本人猜测可能是 返回的时候 写法有问题 但是无奈本人对Gateway网关了解不深 只能先将该类删除 以解决问题!

猜你喜欢

转载自blog.csdn.net/fujiakai/article/details/123824561
今日推荐