Git --distributed-even-if-your-workflow-isnt
About
Documentation
Reference
Book
Videos
External Links
Downloads
Community
This book is available in English.
Full translation available in
български език,
Deutsch,
Español,
Français,
Ελληνικά,
日本語,
한국어,
Nederlands,
Русский,
Slovenščina,
Tagalog,
Українська
简体中文,
Partial translations available in
Čeština,
Македонски,
Polski,
Српски,
Ўзбекча,
繁體中文,
Translations started for
azərbaycan dili,
Беларуская,
فارسی,
Indonesian,
Italiano,
Bahasa Melayu,
Português (Brasil),
Português (Portugal),
Svenska,
Türkçe.
The source of this book is hosted on GitHub.
Patches, suggestions and comments are welcome.
Chapters ▾ 2nd Edition
3.1 Git Branching - Branches in a Nutshell
Nearly every VCS has some form of branching support. Branching means you diverge from the main line of development and continue to do work without messing with that main line. In many VCS tools, this is a somewhat expensive process, often requiring you to create a new copy of your source code directory, which can take a long time for large projects.
Some people refer to Git’s branching model as its “killer feature,” and it certainly sets Git apart in the VCS community. Why is it so special? The way Git branches is incredibly lightweight, making branching operations nearly instantaneous, and switching back and forth between branches generally just as fast. Unlike many other VCSs, Git encourages workflows that branch and merge often, even multiple times in a day. Understanding and mastering this feature gives you a powerful and unique tool and can entirely change the way that you develop.
Branches in a Nutshell
To really understand the way Git does branching, we need to take a step back and examine how Git stores its data.
As you may remember from Getting Started, Git doesn’t store data as a series of changesets or differences, but instead as a series of snapshots.
When you make a commit, Git stores a commit object that contains a pointer to the snapshot of the content you staged. This object also contains the author’s name and email address, the message that you typed, and pointers to the commit or commits that directly came before this commit (its parent or parents): zero parents for the initial commit, one parent for a normal commit, and multiple parents for a commit that results from a merge of two or more branches.
To visualize this, let’s assume that you have a directory containing three files, and you stage them all and commit. Staging the files computes a checksum for each one (the SHA-1 hash we mentioned in Getting Started), stores that version of the file in the Git repository (Git refers to them as blobs), and adds that checksum to the staging area:
$ git add README test.rb LICENSE
$ git commit -m ‘Initial commit’
When you create the commit by running git commit, Git checksums each subdirectory (in this case, just the root project directory) and stores them as a tree object in the Git repository. Git then creates a commit object that has the metadata and a pointer to the root project tree so it can re-create that snapshot when needed.
Your Git repository now contains five objects: three blobs (each representing the contents of one of the three files), one tree that lists the contents of the directory and specifies which file names are stored as which blobs, and one commit with the pointer to that root tree and all the commit metadata.
A commit and its tree.
Figure 9. A commit and its tree
If you make some changes and commit again, the next commit stores a pointer to the commit that came immediately before it.
Commits and their parents.
Figure 10. Commits and their parents
A branch in Git is simply a lightweight movable pointer to one of these commits. The default branch name in Git is master. As you start making commits, you’re given a master branch that points to the last commit you made. Every time you commit, the master branch pointer moves forward automatically.
Note
The “master” branch in Git is not a special branch. It is exactly like any other branch. The only reason nearly every repository has one is that the git init command creates it by default and most people don’t bother to change it.
A branch and its commit history.
Figure 11. A branch and its commit history
Creating a New Branch
What happens when you create a new branch? Well, doing so creates a new pointer for you to move around. Let’s say you want to create a new branch called testing. You do this with the git branch command:
$ git branch testing
This creates a new pointer to the same commit you’re currently on.
Two branches pointing into the same series of commits.
Figure 12. Two branches pointing into the same series of commits
How does Git know what branch you’re currently on? It keeps a special pointer called HEAD. Note that this is a lot different than the concept of HEAD in other VCSs you may be used to, such as Subversion or CVS. In Git, this is a pointer to the local branch you’re currently on. In this case, you’re still on master. The git branch command only created a new branch — it didn’t switch to that branch.
HEAD pointing to a branch.
Figure 13. HEAD pointing to a branch
You can easily see this by running a simple git log command that shows you where the branch pointers are pointing. This option is called --decorate.
$ git log --oneline --decorate
f30ab (HEAD -> master, testing) Add feature #32 - ability to add new formats to the central interface
34ac2 Fix bug #1328 - stack overflow under certain conditions
98ca9 Initial commit
You can see the master and testing branches that are right there next to the f30ab commit.
Switching Branches
To switch to an existing branch, you run the git checkout command. Let’s switch to the new testing branch:
$ git checkout testing
This moves HEAD to point to the testing branch.
HEAD points to the current branch.
Figure 14. HEAD points to the current branch
What is the significance of that? Well, let’s do another commit:
$ vim test.rb
$ git commit -a -m ‘made a change’
The HEAD branch moves forward when a commit is made.
Figure 15. The HEAD branch moves forward when a commit is made
This is interesting, because now your testing branch has moved forward, but your master branch still points to the commit you were on when you ran git checkout to switch branches. Let’s switch back to the master branch:
$ git checkout master
Note
git log doesn’t show all the branches all the time
If you were to run git log right now, you might wonder where the “testing” branch you just created went, as it would not appear in the output.
The branch hasn’t disappeared; Git just doesn’t know that you’re interested in that branch and it is trying to show you what it thinks you’re interested in. In other words, by default, git log will only show commit history below the branch you’ve checked out.
To show commit history for the desired branch you have to explicitly specify it: git log testing. To show all of the branches, add --all to your git log command.
HEAD moves when you checkout.
Figure 16. HEAD moves when you checkout
That command did two things. It moved the HEAD pointer back to point to the master branch, and it reverted the files in your working directory back to the snapshot that master points to. This also means the changes you make from this point forward will diverge from an older version of the project. It essentially rewinds the work you’ve done in your testing branch so you can go in a different direction.
Note
Switching branches changes files in your working directory
It’s important to note that when you switch branches in Git, files in your working directory will change. If you switch to an older branch, your working directory will be reverted to look like it did the last time you committed on that branch. If Git cannot do it cleanly, it will not let you switch at all.
Let’s make a few changes and commit again:
$ vim test.rb
$ git commit -a -m ‘made other changes’
Now your project history has diverged (see Divergent history). You created and switched to a branch, did some work on it, and then switched back to your main branch and did other work. Both of those changes are isolated in separate branches: you can switch back and forth between the branches and merge them together when you’re ready. And you did all that with simple branch, checkout, and commit commands.
Divergent history.
Figure 17. Divergent history
You can also see this easily with the git log command. If you run git log --oneline --decorate --graph --all it will print out the history of your commits, showing where your branch pointers are and how your history has diverged.
$ git log --oneline --decorate --graph --all
- c2b9e (HEAD, master) Made other changes
| * 87ab2 (testing) Made a change
|/ - f30ab Add feature #32 - ability to add new formats to the central interface
- 34ac2 Fix bug #1328 - stack overflow under certain conditions
- 98ca9 initial commit of my project
Because a branch in Git is actually a simple file that contains the 40 character SHA-1 checksum of the commit it points to, branches are cheap to create and destroy. Creating a new branch is as quick and simple as writing 41 bytes to a file (40 characters and a newline).
This is in sharp contrast to the way most older VCS tools branch, which involves copying all of the project’s files into a second directory. This can take several seconds or even minutes, depending on the size of the project, whereas in Git the process is always instantaneous. Also, because we’re recording the parents when we commit, finding a proper merge base for merging is automatically done for us and is generally very easy to do. These features help encourage developers to create and use branches often.
Let’s see why you should do so.
Note
Creating a new branch and switching to it at the same time
It’s typical to create a new branch and want to switch to that new branch at the same time — this can be done in one operation with git checkout -b .
prev | next
About this site
Patches, suggestions, and comments are welcome.
Git is a member of Software Freedom Conservancy
