A year and a half to talk about how to cover the main industry, sideline to develop some common problems, but forgot to answer.
For example, the subject matter hereof, quit a few years once you say is better? This problem can be asked and answered.
Obviously, you are no solution.
Do not believe, under our investigation, you click on next.
Write the manual carefully first, I asked many people, today I have two old colleagues ask me.
In fact, he quit, just traditional companies (500) went to technology start-ups (Unicorn). Colleagues, in fact, 2004-- 2006. During my colleagues, then occasional contact. 39 years old, recent professional experience is a foreign five hundred, he spent twelve years, that is, in 2007, he went in. Of course, in which he also made several trades, for three or four departments.
Generally agree that, HR does not like those who change jobs, the interviewer did not like people change jobs frequently, so many people will "beautify" the resume, the employer will resume work writing several less. Of course, whether through a background check is another matter, the key to quit more often seen really bad.
However, the colleague told me that he quit the company a total of five or six interviews, from five hundred to domestic enterprises, each company's HR first sentence is often questioned him instinctively: "You're actually in a the company spent twelve years?! "
Strange to say, no matter what the nature of the business, HR total always ask this. Two more direct question: "Are you ready to come to our pension?" "You must be on the home really can not stay ......"
So, long-term do not quit, not good, not what you say "stable" to overcome the frequent job-hopping, in fact, is going too far. It's a bit out with our worldly knowledge, especially from out of state-owned enterprises or institutions who, we also know that many times is not to be seen by the market, but always think of their work experience is not recognized by the market, do not match, in fact, more the reason is more stable before too.
The market economy in China has developed a forty-one years, it is hard to single-mindedness for a company, in the past "to do a job for life," the idea is not only realistic, but also outdated, and more to keep up with ever-changing technology development of. For the times require companies is also higher, so companies would like to have a variety of cross-industry and even cross-post work experience, you learn in a company experience, it is clearly limited.
So, how many times to quit, it is double-edged sword.
The current job market, many traditional old stereotype of thinking has been a reversal of fortunes, companies and HR, have also begun to accept those who change jobs many times, especially in the era of the Internet +, the more widespread the movement of persons, who had to quit the stereotype , it has weakened even subversive.
说了半天，究竟几年跳槽一次比较好？
大家看下我的务实建议，这可是有着上万职场求职者经验的建议。
首先，毕业5年内，随便跳，一年一次两次，都行。
关键你要每次工资都比原来高，这前5年是用来认识和了解职场的，用来接触社会的，不经历不知道。我深刻体会到，那些从没跳槽过的人来找我指导，他们真是一张白纸，问得问题比大四学生好不了多少，十万个为什么。
毕业头5年内的跳槽，企业和大股东以及部门经理，都是不太在意的，此时不跳更待何时呢？中年、老年跳槽？你之所以怕，主要是HR会质问你。
都说了，《HR“坏”到什么程度？》，HR就是用来为难你的，打击你的自信心，为了一旦你通过部门的面试好砍你的工资。
你不用在意就可，微微一笑，忽悠过去。实在没话回答，你就说：“是的，之前我是换了几次工作，但我来贵司面试，就是为了以后不跳槽，我想在贵司做一辈子，（如果你们公司能撑到那个时候，如果你届时还待在这里你也还没跳槽）。”括号内的内容，如果你已经有一个Offer在手，可以说，怂回去。
接着，毕业第6年开始，尽量3-5年换一次工作。
此间是对“频繁跳槽”最忌讳的时候，不但HR，包括部门经理以及大领导还有这个社会甚至你的丈母娘/婆婆，都会计较于你频繁换工作，“这人不可靠”“为人比较跳/花心”。所以，此期间你最好在一家公司待5年，至少2年。
最后，毕业10年开外，也就是你都35岁朝后了，尽量5-8年换一次工作。
我之前写过，一个中年人，为了一个加薪20%或30%的工资就跳槽，你是用错了时代。中年人，工资在跳槽考虑因素（工资、工作制、工作量、离家远近、职位晋级、企业主营业务、成立年数、人数、利于副业发展、利于本地人脉提升）中的权重，得进一步降低。
35岁后参考下表吧，年薪不翻番基本没有跳槽的必要，一跳就打脸，半年后苦不堪言，终于让你中年人知道什么叫真正的人生。下表的原则是，总分比目前工作高出10分以上，则可以动一动，中年人确实不能主要为了工资而跳槽。
以上，就是对跳槽频率、岁数、次数的建议。
创新无处不在，整个中国可以说从来没有人这么分析过，他们都叫做一刀切：要么让你“永远不能跳槽”，要么怂你“你赶紧换工作”！
一刀切，非常坏，就是用来给你洗脑的，让你迷惑的，看你的好戏，要你迷茫，至少别超过TA以及TA的孩子，看你流落街头、走很多弯路......这才是这把刀的目的。
转：https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1638460281076120603&wfr=spider&for=pc