Old thinking to master the technology to master the core before graduation, after the entry discovery technology is only a small part of the core. When you see a new technology of the time, ecstatic. It plunged headlong into an official document, but unfortunately do not have a place to practice After reading it, still do not know how to use. Immediately thought of before saw two blog, the general content of the code is agriculture, hacker, views. Content is probably the code farmers and hacker are two types of people compared to the technical staff.
Code Agriculture: What do I need to learn techniques and then I was told to complete the work.hacker: I know what to do, how I need to use technology to integrate.
After the conclusion of the summary,
business and technology are complementary
, technology needs to understand the business, the business needs to understand technology. I began to see the product of the book, relevant knowledge articles. I could not do a product manager, but I learned a lot from.
For example: resource management, requirements analysis, interaction design.
So if the product should be from the perspective of how to treat their own blog it?
Ask a question
- Why the blog is good to see more people.
- Own blog problems?
- How to improve your own blog?
problem analysis
Why someone else's article good?
- Knowledge can then continue on the package, put forward their views, to explain and give examples of analysis.
- Concise, appropriate depth to be able to introduce a problem.
- Meet some people's needs, such as "back office management reading this enough," "interview must have" and so on.
- Structured. There is a hierarchy, from shallow to deep, content loop.
- Exercise, Rome was not built in a day. Good people behind the blog is usually a lot of content output before this. By constantly sum up experience, to reach today's results.
Own blog problems?
- Perfunctory. Own their own perfunctory attitude is not serious, is not correct.
- No article structure. Anticlimactic, table and unclear.
- Content is not easy to understand. Content drag, can not explain clearly that a problem.
- There is a problem on the quality of content, did not stand Tell me what's perspective.
- No summary, just throw in the trash later as written, do not look.
How to improve
Content
- Content should be repeated scrutiny, to produce high quality content.
- The article has a proper structure. Such as the title distinction.
- Most of the spectators in line with demand. Not self-target, but also because most of the part itself.
- Not perfunctory, every article should be treated as a small product.
Spread
Old blog visibility problems, like blog undeniable Park these old blog has no hot year, the blog need to promote multiple places, garden blog, micro-channel public number, Jane books, nuggets and other select several well-known publication, under the premise of high-quality content, subtle build their own label, improve visibility. Then look at more people, there will be more of a good idea, and then continue to sophisticated, forming a virtuous circle.
Replay
Timely recovery disk, and then a period of time should be re-set, analyzing the shortcomings and advantages. Then improvement.
Soil Chengshan, wind and rain Xing Yan; into deep water, dragon born Yan