1. NABCD analysis and reference
1.1 Demand (N)
Task Integration:
More robust management system: the integration of the current popular task information for each task group to facilitate the students to publish tasks and receive tasks to avoid publishing tasks nobody answered the students and students not receive contradictory task of improving the timeliness. For some students have urgent mission requirements, but also a priority in the home and exhibition.
Specification requirements process of
the user's credit historyCampus Wikipedia:
Sometimes the students for some information about the school is very confused, can not find access to school information, especially freshmen. Wikipedia campus students to solve the problem of access to information, providing channels to find information, eliminating the need for students to ask to ask to go the time; also provides students jointly fill in the information school functions, with the help of the majority of students, and gradually get away Encyclopedia school, do Insider.
1.2. Approach (A)
Development of a micro-channel small program to achieve the integration task, campus encyclopedia function, you can publish / next task, campus information inquiries and other functions.
1.3. Benefits (B)
To help users solve the problem of information integration, improve the efficiency of users to achieve requirements for users to save most of the time.
1.4 Competition (C)
Task integration, campus Wikipedia competitor is only active in the task group on QQ, before the students by word of mouth; relative to the task group, we integrate the task more timely, more user-friendly pub / next task, the task campus Wikipedia form the group of students only direct questions and answers, often ask today, tomorrow ask, do not have a record of the way, our campus Wikipedia feature to record all this information together, to facilitate the user to directly query, eliminating the need to ask the time.
1.5. Promotion (D)
Start with the students around the group and the mission to promote, such as after a new school, among newborn promotion. If a good user experience, it can also help spread the word, people around the recommended use, to achieve a pass ten, hundred.
2. The content of the report topic
3. The design of the table panel evaluation
4. Respondent summary
4.1. Proportional contribution
- Criteria: final results
| Well done | acceptable | Failure |
|---|---|---|
| ↑ | - | ↓ |
| member | percentage | Original mandate | Additional tasks | The initiative to undertake | Description negligence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yang Shijie | 18 | Design the questions asked (-), each team scoring (-) | Video appeared (-) | Leader of work-sharing (↑), designed to improve the review form (-), reminded the head of (-), to help with the aftermath leader (↑) | Leader did not notice at the time feel the burn, wrong time botch |
| Chen Wenbin | 17 | The core of the preparation of (-) | Video post (-) | To the head of the ideas (↑), to provide the Panel topics (-), the topic of communication teacher (↑), to the head of the suggestions (↑) | |
| Lin Wentao | 15 | Prototyping (↑) | Recommendations to the head of mention (↑) | ||
| Su Wei Huan | 12 | The core of the preparation of (-) | Video post (-) | ||
| Lin Honghai | 11 | Prototyping (↑) | |||
| Wang Qi Hong | 10 | Production planning book PDF (-) | Video capture (-) | ||
| Lin Xiaotang | 10 | Mapping thinking design (↓), data query (-) | Video appeared (-) | ||
| Zhang overseas | 5 | Tasking (↑), PPT show (↓), blog writing (-), to control the progress (↓), the crew decided to contribute (↑) | Video script (↓), video director (-), appeared in the video (-) | Mind mapping designed to improve (↑), PPT production (↓), questionnaire design (-) | Error when a botch, control freak too strong, did not fulfill the duties of leader, crew surgeon for |
| Dengzhi Xiong | 1 | Mind mapping design (-), data query (-) | Questionnaire Design (↓), questionnaire distribution (-) | Low quality task completion | |
| Gong Lin Yang | 1 | PPT production (↓), Design Review Form (↓) | Error when a botch |
4.2. This group scene plea score
0/60 points
4.3. Other teams to answer questions of this group
| Question Panel | problem | answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | If there is a problem under the trade line, whether platform needs to bear responsibility, to face the task completion uneven phenomenon how to solve | Dealing with these issues all heavily dependent on the completion of the credit system, referring to initiatives takeaway platform. Bear responsibility required, but can do only dishonest user ratings down and hang it in a public area, irreversible loss of customers. I want to introduce a star rating for the quality mark tasks complete, and linked to credit orders staff |
| 2 | ||
| 3 | How to protect the security? How not to run a single support personnel | Dean wants to use binding. Then a sound system there are loopholes exist, you want to enhance the impact of the credit system for students' personal credibility as much as possible. We have no way to avoid this kind of thing can only hope to improve the credit system, this kind of thing very weak |
| 4 | Some advantages of the task group now exists where? Now the task group is also very convenient | Now there is no commitment to a long-term task group, complex, mission-critical possibility, because it is difficult to find staff with the appropriate quality of orders, and there are many factors behind. We really just do not want our platform is only filled with a simple task to take delivery, small part-time. |
| 5 | How to ensure that the task can get a good deal with an emergency? | We have a job market interface, it will give priority to hang out when an emergency task state. |
| 6 | If you need to carry out the task of communication, then you provide a personal touch in the App or private letters or QQ micro letter it? | 我们小组的技术力不是很强，但有实现APP内的私信和评论区的想法。如果规划紧张的话就不予实现了 |
| 7 | 哪家的云服务器30块一个月；为什么团队选题报告不完整，格式混乱；如何处理任务完成失败导致的不可逆转后果。 | 保守起见，预算先拉高一些。团队选题报告不完整是组长没有协调好各方工作，导致其成为弃子；格式混乱是在deadline前，组长私加删改的结果。这种事情非常无力，我们想让我们软件中的信用系统能影响到学生实际生活的信用体系，我们会尝试进行教务处绑定账号 |
| 8 | 如何对发布的任务信息进行筛选以保证其真实性，防止有人散布虚假信息？ | 这个是我们缺乏考虑的地方，多谢你们的提醒。我们想让我们软件中的信用系统能影响到学生实际生活的信用体系，我们会尝试进行教务处绑定账号 |
| 9 | 很多任务都是具有时效性的，如何能保证任务完成率？ | 通过信用系统、排行榜，实现接单者的表现累计，影响其评级。用户发布任务时可以让任务在市场多悬挂一会儿，然后在所有有意愿接单的人中。可以参考他的信用评级，选择更加优质的完成者。可以通过这样的方式，间接提高自己的任务的完成率。另外，我们会公示那些超时的接单者，来被动约束这种不及时完成任务的行为。 |
| 10 | 支付如何实现（安卓端还是小程序，小程序支付的话是有限制的），如何保证一些低俗交易（代考，代写论文） | 我们想实现成小程序。谢谢你们提出来的问题，我们思虑得不够细密，本来是想在支付时实现支付页面的跳转的，但确没考虑到这一点。我们得赶紧去了解相关的信息了 |
| 11 | 两个模块之间似乎没有关系，把他们强行塞到一起是否不合适 | 两个模块的关联度确实很低。但校园百科的部分的不适合独立。我们想通过把任务整合的一些公示模块，如排行榜、黑名单公示等，放置在校园百科的界面中，渐渐地模糊两个模块的边界 |
| 12 |
4.4. 根据答辩中其它小组提出的意见和建议，修改完善本组团队选题报告
- 产品功能增加
- 我们想让我们软件中的信用系统能影响到学生实际生活的信用体系，我们会尝试进行教务处绑定账号
- 产品优势分析增加
无