APIs play a key role in our digital world, enabling a variety of different applications to communicate with each other. However, the reliability of these APIs is a critical factor in ensuring that the applications that depend on them function properly and perform consistently. In this article, we'll explore five main strategies for improving API reliability.
1. Thorough testing
The first step to ensuring the reliability of your API is thorough testing. The tests that need to be performed include: functional testing to verify that the API is working correctly, integration testing to ensure that the API works properly with other systems, and load testing to understand how the API will behave under large-scale use.
Automated testing can catch problems early in the development cycle, and regression testing can ensure that new changes do not break existing functionality. API dependencies can be simulated for deeper testing using virtualization or mocking techniques. Furthermore, contract testing is very important in order to ensure that both providers and consumers of the API satisfy the agreed interface.
Below we will use Go's built-in testing package to test a hypothetical API endpoint (the URI used to access the API) through a simple example.
Let's say we have an endpoint GET /users/{id} that returns user details.
Here is the test code we might write:
package main
import (
"net/http"
"net/http/httptest"
"testing"
)
// 这是一个简化的实际处理器函数示例
func UserHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
// ... 处理器逻辑
}
func TestUserHandler(t *testing.T) {
req, err := http.NewRequest("GET", "/users/1", nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
rr := httptest.NewRecorder()
handler := http.HandlerFunc(UserHandler)
handler.ServeHTTP(rr, req)
if status := rr.Code; status != http.StatusOK {
t.Errorf("handler returned wrong status code: got %v want %v",
status, http.StatusOK)
}
// 你还可以检查响应体是否符合预期的输出
expected := `{"id": "1", "name": "John Doe"}`
if rr.Body.String() != expected {
t.Errorf("handler returned unexpected body: got %v want %v",
rr.Body.String(), expected)
}
}This test creates a new HTTP request, mocks a call to our /users/{id} endpoint, and passes the request to the handler function. The test checks that the response status is 200 OK (what we expect from a successful request) and that the response body matches the expected output.
This example is just a simple example. In actual applications, you may face more complex scenarios, including testing various boundary conditions, wrong paths, etc. Additionally, the net/http/httptest package provides a number of tools for testing HTTP clients and servers.
In summary, you can combine unit testing, performance testing, and continuous integration testing to build a comprehensive test suite for your API.
The purpose of unit testing is to ensure the correctness of each component in your API. It allows you to detect and correct problems early on by verifying the functionality of each part and isolating them. Unit testing is usually done by mocking dependencies and testing functions in isolation. In the Go language, packages such as testify can be used to achieve this goal.
Performance testing is to stress test the API under high traffic conditions. This type of testing helps you determine how your system will perform under high load, identify bottlenecks, and ensure that your API can handle real-world usage. Performance testing can be done using tools like JMeter or Gatling .
Finally, continuous integration testing tests the workflow of the system by simulating a series of continuous operations on the API by users or clients. This type of testing can provide insight into end-to-end workflows, potential impediments or delays, and overall user experience. This process can be automated and integrated into your CI/CD process, allowing you to continuously monitor and provide timely feedback on the impact of any code changes.
By implementing a comprehensive testing strategy that includes functional testing, unit testing, performance testing, and continuous synthesis testing, you can ensure that your API is not only stable and performant, but also provides a seamless experience for consumers. When a problem occurs, this diversified testing method can help you quickly locate and solve the root cause of the problem.
2. Version control
API version management plays a central role in maintaining the stability of software systems. Over time, the API may change and refine according to requirements, and without proper versioning, it may break existing client applications. This is the crux of API versioning. By maintaining versions of the API, you can introduce new features and optimizations without impacting applications using older versions of the API.
This strategy improves the stability of the system, because even if the API is changed and optimized, the client application can still run stably. It allows developers to deploy API updates without worrying that these changes will cause damage to running applications, ensuring the stability and normal operation of the system.
Maintaining backward compatibility is a key part of achieving API stability, that is, new systems should be compatible with older versions of the API. Even if a new version is released, applications using the old API version will still run normally. This avoids breaking the user experience and gives developers enough time to update their apps to accommodate new APIs at their own pace, rather than being forced to upgrade to prevent bugs. Doing so helps create an overall more stable, robust and resilient system.
example
In the Go language, we can use a variety of methods for API version management.
The following example shows how to implement versioning by embedding the API version in the URL, an approach often referred to as "path versioning".
package main
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
)
func handleRequest(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
switch r.URL.Path {
case "/v1/users":
fmt.Fprintf(w, "You've hit the version 1 of the users API!")
case "/v2/users":
fmt.Fprintf(w, "You've hit the version 2 of the users API!")
default:
http.NotFound(w, r)
}
}
func main() {
http.HandleFunc("/", handleRequest)
http.ListenAndServe(":8080", nil)
}In this example, we define a handler function that matches the code of the response based on the URL path of the request. When accessing the "/v1/users" path, we consider this a request for the first version of our API. Likewise, "/v2/users" corresponds to the second version of our API. You can easily extend this pattern to accommodate more versions and endpoints by adding more branches.
Alternatively, you can implement versioning through custom headers or media type versioning (also known as "content negotiation").
Regardless of the versioning strategy you choose, it's good practice to maintain clear and up-to-date documentation for each version of your API.
However, we also need to use versioning carefully. We should try to maintain backwards compatibility as much as possible and provide clear documentation. Documentation should detail changes in each new release and provide a reasonable timeline for deprecating older releases.
3. Design for failure
Ideally, the API should always work correctly. In practice, however, failures are not uncommon. In the process of designing an API, we need to consider its fault tolerance, which may involve things such as graceful degradation (that is, the system continues to run but with reduced functionality) and failover mechanisms (that is, the system automatically switches to the backup system in the event of a failure) etc. Strategy.
Incorporating explicit error messages and codes into your API can help your application better understand what is wrong and what to do about it. We can allow the system to recover from temporary problems and avoid cascading failures through retry logic, rate limiting, and circuit breakers.
The diagram below shows what to do for each failure type:
Example: Circuit Breaker Pattern
In the circuit breaker pattern, the Go language has a popular library called go-hystrix , which focuses on latency and fault tolerance. It primarily prevents cascading failures by failing fast when services stop. Here is a basic example:
package main
import (
"github.com/afex/hystrix-go/hystrix"
"log"
"net/http"
"errors"
)
func main() {
hystrix.ConfigureCommand("my_command", hystrix.CommandConfig{
Timeout: 1000,
MaxConcurrentRequests: 100,
ErrorPercentThreshold: 25,
})
http.HandleFunc("/", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
err := hystrix.Do("my_command", func() error {
// 调用其他服务
return nil
}, nil)
if err != nil {
log.Printf("Failed to talk to other services: %v", err)
http.Error(w, "Failed to talk to other services", http.StatusInternalServerError)
}
})
log.Fatal(http.ListenAndServe(":1234", nil))
}In the above example, we wrapped a command in hystrix.Do(). If the function passed into Do() fails or times out based on the parameters we set, the circuit breaker is triggered and subsequent calls will fail immediately without calling the function.
Please note that this is just a basic example, real application scenarios will involve more complex usages, requiring fine-tuning of various parameters involved in this library and other elastic utility libraries. Be sure to read the documentation of the various libraries to gain a solid understanding of how to use them effectively in your code.
4. Monitoring and analysis
Real-time monitoring and timely analysis are crucial to ensure the stability of the API. Implementing a comprehensive API monitoring strategy can include detection of uptime, performance, and errors, which helps us detect and deal with problems before they spread to affect users.
At the same time, in-depth analysis of API usage patterns can give us important insights. Knowing peak load times, most frequently used endpoints, and other usage details allows you to proactively identify possible weaknesses and optimize your API accordingly.
Choosing the right metrics to track is critical to understanding the health and performance of your API. Here are some key metrics to consider:
1. Throughput: The number of requests processed by your API per unit time, which can be further divided into endpoints, HTTP methods (such as GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc.) or response status codes.
2. Error rate: the number of error responses per unit time, usually refers to the response containing 4xx or 5xx status code. Like throughput, this metric can also be broken down by endpoint, HTTP method, or specific status code.
3. Latency: The time it takes to process a request, usually tracked as a range of percentiles (such as the 50th, 95th, and 99th percentile), which can help you understand typical and corner-case performance. You may need to track this separately for different endpoints or HTTP methods.
4. Traffic: The amount of data sent and received, which can be broken down by endpoint, HTTP method, or response status code.
5. Availability: The percentage of time your API is up and able to process requests, can be measured as a whole, or for each individual endpoint.
6. Saturation: The degree to which the system is reaching maximum capacity, which can be understood by measuring CPU usage, memory usage, disk I/O, or other resources that may limit the system to handle more load.
7. Circuit breaker triggering: If you use the circuit breaker pattern to handle failures, you may want to track how often the circuit breaker is triggered, which can help you understand how often the API or its dependencies fail.
Keep in mind that the exact metrics you choose to track may vary depending on your API features and application needs. The key is to choose metrics that give you meaningful insight into the health and performance of your API.
Take Prometheus as an example:
Prometheus is an open source system monitoring and alerting toolkit with a built-in client library that supports measuring your services in various languages. Here's an example of how to display metrics on an HTTP endpoint using the Go client library.
We will use the Prometheus Go client to display and create these metrics.
package main
import (
"net/http"
"github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus"
"github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus/promhttp"
)
var (
httpRequestsTotal = prometheus.NewCounterVec(
prometheus.CounterOpts{
Name: "http_requests_total",
Help: "Number of HTTP requests",
},
[]string{"path"},
)
httpRequestDuration = prometheus.NewSummaryVec(
prometheus.SummaryOpts{
Name: "http_request_duration_seconds",
Help: "Duration of HTTP requests in seconds",
},
[]string{"path"},
)
)
func init() {
// Register the metrics.
prometheus.MustRegister(httpRequestsTotal)
prometheus.MustRegister(httpRequestDuration)
}
func handler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
// Increment the counter for the received requests.
httpRequestsTotal.WithLabelValues(r.URL.Path).Inc()
// Measure the time it took to serve the request.
timer := prometheus.NewTimer(httpRequestDuration.WithLabelValues(r.URL.Path))
defer timer.ObserveDuration()
// Handle the request.
w.Write([]byte("Hello, world!"))
}
func main() {
http.HandleFunc("/", handler)
// Expose the registered metrics via HTTP.
http.Handle("/metrics", promhttp.Handler())
http.ListenAndServe(":8080", nil)
}In this example, we create and register two metrics: http_requests_total and http_request_duration_seconds. The former is a counter that is incremented each time a request is received, and the latter is an aggregated metric that records how long it took to process each request.
We then created an HTTP handler that incremented a counter and measured the execution time of the request each time it was processed. We expose these metrics on the /metrics endpoint using promhttp.Handler().
Now, as soon as you start the server and send a request to it, you can view these metrics by visiting http://localhost:8080/metrics or using tools such as curl.
This is just a basic example, in practice, you may want to track more metrics and segment them based on other dimensions (such as HTTP method, response status code, etc.).
5. Leverage the API Gateway
API gateway is a powerful tool that can effectively improve the robustness of API. As the unified entrance of the system, the API gateway can handle multiple functions such as routing, load balancing, authentication, and current limiting. By abstracting these concerns from the API body, you can focus more on business logic rather than infrastructure.
Additionally, API Gateway can provide additional resiliency features such as automatic failover, caching of responses for performance, and buffering or queuing of requests during times of high load.
The following lists some of the functions that API Gateway can provide to help you choose the appropriate API Gateway for your technology stack:
- Request routing: API Gateway can route client requests to appropriate backend services based on the routing information in the request.
- API version management: API gateway can manage multiple versions of API, allowing clients to use different versions in parallel.
- Current limiting: In order to avoid flooding backend services with excessive requests, the API gateway can limit the request rate of a client or a group of clients.
- Authentication and authorization: API gateways typically handle authentication and authorization of client requests, ensuring that only authenticated and authorized requests reach backend services.
- API key management: API gateways typically manage API keys, which are used to track and control how the API is used.
- Caching: To improve performance and reduce the load on backend services, API Gateway can cache responses from backend services and return the cached responses when receiving the same request.
- Request and Response Transformation: An API Gateway can transform requests and responses into the format required by clients or backend services.
- Circuit breaker function: When a service fails, the API gateway can prevent the application from crashing by routing the request to the functioning service.
- Monitoring and Analysis: API Gateway can collect API usage and performance data for analysis, monitoring and alerting.
- Security policy: API Gateway can implement security policies, such as IP whitelist, while preventing security threats such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS).
Here are some well-known open source API gateways:
- Kong : Kong is a cloud-native, fast, scalable, and distributed microservice management layer (also known as API gateway or API middleware). It exists as an open source project since 2015, its core functionality is written in Lua and runs on the Nginx web server.
- Tyk : Tyk is an open source API gateway that runs fast and is highly scalable. It can run on a standalone server or work with an existing Nginx installation.
- Express Gateway : Express Gateway is a microservice API gateway built on Express.js. The gateway is fully scalable and does not depend on any specific framework, capable of providing a robust and scalable solution in a short period of time.
- KrakenD : KrakenD is a high-performance open source API gateway. KrakenD removes all the complexity of SOA architectures to support application developers to release new features quickly while maintaining excellent performance.
Overall, improving the reliability of your API is not a one-time task, but an ongoing effort. This includes rigorous testing, precise version control, following good design principles, intelligent use of tools like API gateways, and continuous monitoring and analysis. With these strategies in place, you'll be able to build APIs that stand the test of time and provide a solid foundation for your application.
Original title: https://www.codereliant.io/5-ways-to-improve-your-api-reliability/
See more great tools
Space elevators, MOSS, ChatGPT, etc. all indicate that 2023 is not destined to be an ordinary year. Any new technology is worthy of scrutiny, and we should have this sensitivity.
In the past few years, I have vaguely encountered low-code, and it is relatively popular at present, and many major manufacturers have joined in one after another.
Low-code platform concept: Through automatic code generation and visual programming, only a small amount of code is needed to quickly build various applications.
What is low-code, in my opinion, is dragging, whirring, and one-pass operation to create a system that can run, front-end, back-end, and database, all in one go. Of course this may be the end goal.
Link: www.jnpfsoft.com/?csdn, if you are interested, try it too.
The advantage of JNPF is that it can generate front-end and back-end codes, which provides great flexibility and can create more complex and customized applications. Its architectural design also allows developers to focus on the development of application logic and user experience without worrying about the underlying technical details.