2019-3-29
拟录取名单 out, they would be relieved, a year of postgraduate life finally came to an end, he has been helping many seniors sister school in the course of the study section, and now he is to share the experience of the past year and lessons, hoping to slightly help to newcomers.
About the first test:
North rationale for the test subjects Eiji, number two, political, and 889 (Professional Code, only the data structure of a professional course), compared to 985 in terms of other colleges and universities, the North reason is really very friendly, the test subjects were, relatively speaking relatively simple (of course, which resulted in particularly high marks students, there are 20 special master 400 + year, of course, this is also related to the size of the year), if you are relatively few in university research projects and competitions, then, now to 6 February is your last chance, after all these experiences to you by re-examination is very helpful. Because the content of the test is relatively small, so I think in June before starting the review also possible.
mathematics:
The mathematics with Tommy.
There is no doubt that mathematics is the most important, this year's math is relatively simple, can be 20 not so lucky, I was with the whole of Tommy, so other teachers are not particularly aware of, I think what the teachers are the same, as long as you have been told to go the whole is no problem, I begin to review the March, beginning to see Lecture 18 supporting video (last in love sail above), the 18 talked about it again, do it first pass it is quite difficult, and then look at the line on behalf of 9 to say this because during this period took part in some games, so read it again already summer vacation, summer vacation I will make peace line represents the high number of 18 and 9 speak over again, with the sheets Yu's 1000 title (of course, the amount of problems, some large, some topics are more biased, look at their own situation deciding whether or not to do it), in September began writing Zhenti Daquan solution after another, other than by nine years Zhenti addition (a title style and now is not the same), the other must be done in accordance with the test of time, probably a few days to write it, revised Zhenti best finish also put before himself wrote the wrong title to consolidate reconsolidation, for exams The wrong side of the question must write a few times, pay attention to problem-solving approach in mind, The last eleven December when I wrote Tommy analog 8 sets, 4 sets of volumes (at that time did not finish, have each write only a fraction of 90, the best there is somewhat 110), HIT and beyond to create a simulation that is very good, there is time to be doing, in general, mathematics is the most worthy subject of your time, more questions, more thinking, the results will not be too bad.
English:
Yellow Book with Reading, listening to the Tang Chi class (because I think routines are similar, then there is no continue to listen anymore), writing with the Jiang-Tao Wang.
English two English compared to a simple or many, is the early word back, you can use software or books are, after all, is the basis of the word, the summer when you can start photo title, because the English began to be two years from 10, so true problem is quite valuable, you can write a English Zhenti, I was writing is to read, to find out after the finish will be inside their own words back a back, you can usually read the article out and enhance the sense of language . To October when you can start doing the Eiji Zhenti, Zhenti I think the best time to do examinations in accordance with, can also do a few times, must take Zhenti inside Eiji words back at all. Writing, then I use WANG Jiang-tao, you can start in November again, pay attention to sum up their routines so that they have something to say on into the exam, the most important thing is reading comprehension, cloze, then compare scores because less, so do not spend too much time, after all, a good reading comprehension, gestalt also mention.
political:
Xu Tao and Xiao Xiurong with the political.
Intensive courses from September began to listen Taotao class (with a central test case or Shaw Jingjiang concise), his class was very interesting, listening to intensive courses of lessons that I began to write the title Xiao Xiurong 1000, the best Do not write directly on it, you can put yourself wrong topic turns out, do it a second time, in November also listen to the lesson Xu Tao sprint classes, consolidate consolidate knowledge, December 8 Xiao Xiao 4 came out, Shaw 8 only choice to become, Shaw 4 big questions must all be back next year have the original title, of course, if you feel that is not enough, you can back back 20 questions Taotao out late, then just look to see the electronic version , also almost the same.
Courses:
Benevolent courses used.
North reasonable courses is quite simple, and only one, just look to become king, the only caveat is likely Chaogang (efflux test this year, there is a forgotten ...), it is only as a reference outline , or as much as possible a comprehensive review of it!
About re-examination:
First test No. 5, only 20 overall, my experience is only as a reference.
When the results came out if that is no problem, then we must contact the instructor, many understand, contact the teacher early, then it will not be good to other people away, particularly late this year, I contacted, but fortunately I told the teacher that people are still super good, research themselves prefer.
Re-examination a total of 100 points, the final result is (first test results + 5 * retest results) / 2, can be imagined, one point is worth re-examination preliminary examination 5 points it! Specific timing can refer to 19 years, the official website to download it on their own.
Spoken English: 10 points.
Only two teachers, is the first to introduce myself, was a little nervous, there is a long sentence stuttered ... so it is recommended when preparing a brief on how how to become, because my undergraduate Nanjing, when the teacher asked me why go Beijing, Beijing I said all kinds of good, a lot of opportunities ah, development of the Internet in particular, what the good, the teacher said Nanjing is also very good ah, I had my heart ah? Later, I asked why the cross-examination from network engineering to computer technology, computers are related, and I was ah? (This, too, cross-examination, probably because the North reason there are college network, right) I'm sure for a moment the teacher to say, and then silence, and then the teacher said is over, what information, if desired spoken language, then you can contact me (free drops) in general is relatively simple, ask the subject will always be a few, just to prepare a brief few words, so when the interview was said to become.
Listening: 10 minutes.
Feeling has six difficulty, ready to re-examination when you can spend half an hour a day to practice listening comprehension exercises, after all, the score is still getting bigger.
On board: 20 points.
Although only 20 points, but it is very important that you raise your hand after the finish, the teacher came to give you input into the data to see the results right, each test data corresponding to a certain score, the spot will know how many points their own exam, the interview is to ask an expert, this year's topic is particularly simple, you can use STL, with a set, with a priority queue, multi-brush questions can be.
https://blog.csdn.net/u014552756/article/details/78505845
Expert Interview: 20 + 40 points.
Including professional title 20 points, seven selected four people + a problem (includes compiler theory, database, assembly language, operating system, software engineering, mathematics, computer network), if you select multiple choice, without explanation, just tell the teacher you choose What is the answer to the teacher on the spot your grade, I had time to review can be kept, and feel completely content too much endless, and the last is looked at textbooks topic over the years, trying to look on the line, do not think too much, because impossible to read, choose their most familiar subjects began to read, I had smoked the last set of questions, it will be a problem, then be alarmed (a title review did not test the will is the will, or will not not ...), humanities title be brief, clear logic can be. https://blog.csdn.net/u014552756/article/details/78505925
interview accounted for 40 points, I was with a resume in the past, because I wrote joined the school ACM contest on a resume, the teacher was asked what I learned algorithm , which algorithm is best at, participated in the ACM country race it, a teacher asked how many points I machine test, contacted which the teacher, when I say xxx, but the teacher did not return to me, and then the teachers laughed, a teacher said, , sent him a message of too many students could not read, did not ask any other questions, complete set and projects teachers are not asked (in front of my classmates have asked to), ask them a question on the quiet several seconds , which led me to think that they cool, and ended too soon, not too nervous, teachers who are super good.
other:
About North rationale: North rationale is quite fair to school, although my undergraduate is non-dual, but through their own efforts or success as a manager of the North.
About PubMed: PubMed understand why they have to study section, multi-disciplinary multi-disciplinary we have to understand why. I was beginning to feel a sister school seniors was amazing, admitted handed, Fudan University, Nanjing University and other schools, I'm going to test later in PubMed way, I understand that they want to be able to acquire the knowledge learned, to make with their like-minded friends, to open up their horizons, to enhance their ability to make even a Diudiu contributions to the field of their beloved, it is very significant.
About Resources: Wang forum is a very good platform, what can ask questions of, sister school seniors who will give you a general answer; no additive group can add a group: 492 030 260, which is the sister school seniors who are super good, what questions can be asked, but if it is a simple question Baidu, you can not please them or out of it!
In the review process should pay attention to change their attitude, if conditions allow, can and small partners to review together (we go over the little friends have been successfully landing), so what is the problem can also be more communication, especially in the latter part of the , I personally feel, as long as seriously do their own thing to do is like, do not want those who do not use.
Have to say, this is a long and lonely process, many times you are alone in the battle, but as long as you are determined that something you do not consider so much, according to seriously review their own learning plan, there is a problem when more and seniors sister school exchange, maintain a good attitude, be able to do a comprehensive review many times, are no problem, after all, this is basically a pay and reward is proportional to the process.
If you do not test people to see through the study of the experience of others stickers you might say how do you do? In fact, you will once had the experience of empathy, or even kind of sense of bitterness.
If you want to do, then do it seriously! Do not think about what the test into how to do, the whole world of postgraduate who are faced with such a risk, but at least you tried this purpose, I personally feel that life can have such an experience is very precious, and I hope music.brothers It can successfully landed in the North reason I wait for you!
