Test ENV
Two libp2p hosts running on the same PC, communicating to each other with loopback interface
Host A -> Host B, uni-direction
Case 1, secio, AES+SHA
19:19:34.257 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=51.39MB/s, elapsed=19.458s common.go:1001
19:19:55.198 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=57.77MB/s, elapsed=17.309s common.go:1001
19:20:14.228 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=57.98MB/s, elapsed=17.247s common.go:1001
Case 2, tls, AES-GCM-128 by default
19:16:16.947 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=80.40MB/s, elapsed=12.438s common.go:1002
19:16:32.845 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=79.87MB/s, elapsed=12.521s common.go:1002
19:16:50.199 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=78.85MB/s, elapsed=12.682s common.go:1002
Case 3, no security
19:21:53.118 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=101.13MB/s, elapsed=9.888s common.go:1002
19:22:06.980 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=106.45MB/s, elapsed=9.394s common.go:1002
19:22:18.085 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=98.71MB/s, elapsed=10.131s common.go:1002
Case 4, Private Network(salsa20) + no security
21:22:14.351 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=79.69MB/s, elapsed=12.549s common.go:1031
21:22:32.460 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=80.20MB/s, elapsed=12.469s common.go:1031
21:22:46.370 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=79.90MB/s, elapsed=12.516s common.go:1031
Case 5, Private Network(salsa20) + secio
21:25:20.243 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=50.35MB/s, elapsed=19.86s common.go:1031
21:25:43.967 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=50.66MB/s, elapsed=19.738s common.go:1031
21:26:05.711 ERROR common: Copied=1000M, rate=52.85MB/s, elapsed=18.923s common.go:1031
Conclusion
- secio is quite slow, need GCM support in future
- salsa20 is good, but probably less secure than AES
