界面 http://127.0.0.1:8080/test.html 大小15.1k文本
tomcat5.5
并发/请求
100 / 100000
无tcnative-1.dll时 Time per request: 5.337 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
有tcnative-1.dll时apr Time per request: 8.331 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
并发/请求
10/10000
无tcnative-1.dll时 Time per request: 4.474 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
有tcnative-1.dll时apr Time per request: 5.004 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
tomcat7 64位
并发/请求
100 / 100000
bio Time per request: 8.472 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
nio Time per request: 7.868 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
apr Time per request: 7.976 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
并发/请求
10 / 10000
bio Time per request: 7.218 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
nio Time per request: 10.120 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
apr Time per request: 6.134 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
tomcat7 32位（线程池会溢出）
并发/请求
100 / 100000
bio
nio
apr Time per request: 10.449 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
并发/请求
10 / 10000
bio
nio
apr Time per request: 5.759 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
tomcat的 apr在windows下是默认开启的 在linux下需要配置
测试下来 感觉 还是apr比较靠谱 网上也没有类似的性能参考