dubbo服务引用与集群容错

服务引用无非就是做了两件事

  • 将spring的schemas标签信息转换bean,然后通过这个bean的信息,连接、订阅zookeeper节点信息创建一个invoker

  • invoker的信息创建一个动态代理对象

时序图:

最终返回一个被调用接口的动态代理对象。

在调用代理对象的方法时,会进入InvokerInvocationHandle类的逻辑。

跟踪源码的时候,发现消费端调用invoke的时候要调用一连串的Invoker实现类,一直纠结这些Invoker是用来做什么的?

Invoker的创建应该是入口,也就是从referenceConfig类开始

然后找到RegistryProtocol.doRefer方法

private <T> Invoker<T> doRefer(Cluster cluster, Registry registry, Class<T> type, URL url) {
    RegistryDirectory<T> directory = new RegistryDirectory<T>(type, url);
    directory.setRegistry(registry);
    directory.setProtocol(protocol);
    URL subscribeUrl = new URL(Constants.CONSUMER_PROTOCOL, NetUtils.getLocalHost(), 0, type.getName(), directory.getUrl().getParameters());
    if (! Constants.ANY_VALUE.equals(url.getServiceInterface())
            && url.getParameter(Constants.REGISTER_KEY, true)) {
        registry.register(subscribeUrl.addParameters(Constants.CATEGORY_KEY, Constants.CONSUMERS_CATEGORY,
                Constants.CHECK_KEY, String.valueOf(false)));
    }

    directory.subscribe(subscribeUrl.addParameter(Constants.CATEGORY_KEY, 
            Constants.PROVIDERS_CATEGORY 
            + "," + Constants.CONFIGURATORS_CATEGORY 
            + "," + Constants.ROUTERS_CATEGORY));
    
    return cluster.join(directory);
}

也就是这一行:
cluster.join(directory);

在执行join方法的时候,会通过SPI机制找到cluster的扩展实例,默认的时候FailoverCluster
但是调试发现第一步创建的实例化对象是MockClusterWrapper类而不是FailoverCluster
查阅资料 dubbo中的mock机制 再结合源码总结如下:
在dubbo的配置文件  classpath:/META-INF/dubbo/internal/com.alibaba.dubbo.rpc.cluster.Cluster中,failover对应的是FailoverCluster类:
但是ExtensionLoader在实例化对象时,有个比较特殊的地方,那就是在实例化完成之后,会自动套上当前的ExtensionLoader中的Wrapper类,上面的mock所对应的MockClusterWrapper就是这样的一个Wrapper:也就是实例化出来的FailoverCluster会被套上一层MockClusterWrapper,总结一下就是:
Cluster$Adaptive -> 定位到内部key为failover的对象 ->FailoverCluster->外部套上MockClusterWrapper
 
所以时序图是这样的:
 
官网集群容错介绍图:
 
根据以上时序图查看源码如下:
MockClusterInvoker.java
public Result invoke(Invocation invocation) throws RpcException {
        Result result = null;

        String value = directory.getUrl().getMethodParameter(invocation.getMethodName(), Constants.MOCK_KEY, Boolean.FALSE.toString()).trim();
        if (value.length() == 0 || value.equalsIgnoreCase("false")) {
            //no mock
            //执行到这一行的时候开始进入集群 cluster -> AbstractClusterInvoker
            result = this.invoker.invoke(invocation);
        } else if (value.startsWith("force")) {
            if (logger.isWarnEnabled()) {
                logger.warn("force-mock: " + invocation.getMethodName() + " force-mock enabled , url : " + directory.getUrl());
            }
            //force:direct mock
            result = doMockInvoke(invocation, null);
        } else {
            //fail-mock
            try {
                result = this.invoker.invoke(invocation);
            } catch (RpcException e) {
                if (e.isBiz()) {
                    throw e;
                } else {
                    if (logger.isWarnEnabled()) {
                        logger.warn("fail-mock: " + invocation.getMethodName() + " fail-mock enabled , url : " + directory.getUrl(), e);
                    }
                    result = doMockInvoke(invocation, e);
                }
            }
        }
        return result;
    }

  AbstractClusterInvoker.java

public Result invoke(final Invocation invocation) throws RpcException {
        checkWhetherDestroyed();

        // binding attachments into invocation.
        Map<String, String> contextAttachments = RpcContext.getContext().getAttachments();
        if (contextAttachments != null && contextAttachments.size() != 0) {
            ((RpcInvocation) invocation).addAttachments(contextAttachments);
        }
         
         //选择出可用的invoker集合
        List<Invoker<T>> invokers = list(invocation);
        // 初始化负载均衡策略
        LoadBalance loadbalance = initLoadBalance(invokers, invocation);
        RpcUtils.attachInvocationIdIfAsync(getUrl(), invocation);
        return doInvoke(invocation, invokers, loadbalance);
    }


   protected List<Invoker<T>> list(Invocation invocation) throws RpcException {
        // -> AbstractDirectory.java
        return directory.list(invocation);
    }

 AbstractDirectory.java

public List<Invoker<T>> list(Invocation invocation) throws RpcException {
        if (destroyed) {
            throw new RpcException("Directory already destroyed .url: " + getUrl());
        }
        
// 模板方法,由子类实现
// -> RegistryDirectory.java 或者 StaticDirectory.java
List<Invoker<T>> invokers = doList(invocation); List<Router> localRouters = this.routers; // local reference if (localRouters != null && !localRouters.isEmpty()) { for (Router router : localRouters) { try { if (router.getUrl() == null || router.getUrl().getParameter(Constants.RUNTIME_KEY, false)) { //将invokers返回后,下面来到了Router,开始进入路由,现在我们到了序号6,此时到了MockInvokersSelector类, //他是Router接口的实现类,从官网的介绍图中我们也可以看到Router分为Script和Condition两种,翻译过来也就是脚本路由和条件路由 invokers = router.route(invokers, getConsumerUrl(), invocation); } } catch (Throwable t) { logger.error("Failed to execute router: " + getUrl() + ", cause: " + t.getMessage(), t); } } } return invokers; }

    RegistryDirectory.java

public List<Invoker<T>> doList(Invocation invocation) {
        if (forbidden) {
            // 1. No service provider 2. Service providers are disabled
            throw new RpcException(RpcException.FORBIDDEN_EXCEPTION,
                    "No provider available from registry " + getUrl().getAddress() + " for service " + getConsumerUrl().getServiceKey() + " on consumer " + NetUtils.getLocalHost()
                            + " use dubbo version " + Version.getVersion() + ", please check status of providers(disabled, not registered or in blacklist).");
        }
        List<Invoker<T>> invokers = null;
        Map<String, List<Invoker<T>>> localMethodInvokerMap = this.methodInvokerMap; // local reference
        if (localMethodInvokerMap != null && localMethodInvokerMap.size() > 0) {
            String methodName = RpcUtils.getMethodName(invocation);
            Object[] args = RpcUtils.getArguments(invocation);
            if (args != null && args.length > 0 && args[0] != null
                    && (args[0] instanceof String || args[0].getClass().isEnum())) {
                invokers = localMethodInvokerMap.get(methodName + "." + args[0]); // The routing can be enumerated according to the first parameter
            }
            if (invokers == null) {
                invokers = localMethodInvokerMap.get(methodName);
            }
            if (invokers == null) {
                invokers = localMethodInvokerMap.get(Constants.ANY_VALUE);
            }
            if (invokers == null) {
                Iterator<List<Invoker<T>>> iterator = localMethodInvokerMap.values().iterator();
                if (iterator.hasNext()) {
                    invokers = iterator.next();
                }
            }
        }
        return invokers == null ? new ArrayList<Invoker<T>>(0) : invokers;
    }

MockInvokersSelector.java

public <T> List<Invoker<T>> route(final List<Invoker<T>> invokers,
                                      URL url, final Invocation invocation) throws RpcException {
        if (invocation.getAttachments() == null) {
            return getNormalInvokers(invokers);
        } else {
            String value = invocation.getAttachments().get(Constants.INVOCATION_NEED_MOCK);
            if (value == null) {
                //拿到能正常执行的invokers,并将其返回
                return getNormalInvokers(invokers);
            } else if (Boolean.TRUE.toString().equalsIgnoreCase(value)) {
                return getMockedInvokers(invokers);
            }
        }
        return invokers;
    }


    private <T> List<Invoker<T>> getNormalInvokers(final List<Invoker<T>> invokers) {
        if (!hasMockProviders(invokers)) {
            return invokers;
        } else {
            List<Invoker<T>> sInvokers = new ArrayList<Invoker<T>>(invokers.size());
            for (Invoker<T> invoker : invokers) {
                if (!invoker.getUrl().getProtocol().equals(Constants.MOCK_PROTOCOL)) {
                    sInvokers.add(invoker);
                }
            }
            return sInvokers;
        }
    }
上面出现的这两个关键词,其实无非就是做两件事
在Directory中找出本次集群中的全部invokers
在Router中,将上一步的全部invokers挑选出能正常执行的invokers
回到AbstractClusterInvoker.java
 
      ......
        //选择出可用的invoker集合
        List<Invoker<T>> invokers = list(invocation);
         // 初始化负载均衡策略
        LoadBalance loadbalance = initLoadBalance(invokers, invocation);
        RpcUtils.attachInvocationIdIfAsync(getUrl(), invocation);
        return doInvoke(invocation, invokers, loadbalance);
从上面步骤已经挑选出能正常执行的invokers了,但是假如2个做集群,但是这两个都是正常的,到底要执行哪一个呢?
 根据官网的描述
在集群调用失败时,Dubbo 提供了多种容错方案,缺省为 failover 重试。
所以这个时候是到了FailoverClusterInvoker类,但是如果你配置的是Failfast Cluster(快速失败),Failsafe Cluster(失败安全),Failback Cluster(失败自动恢复),Forking Cluster(并行调用多个服务器,只要一个成功即返回),Broadcast Cluster(广播调用所有提供者,逐个调用,任意一台报错则报错)他也会到达相应的类
FailoverClusterInvoker.java
public Result doInvoke(Invocation invocation, final List<Invoker<T>> invokers, LoadBalance loadbalance) throws RpcException {
        List<Invoker<T>> copyinvokers = invokers;
        checkInvokers(copyinvokers, invocation);
        String methodName = RpcUtils.getMethodName(invocation);
        int len = getUrl().getMethodParameter(methodName, Constants.RETRIES_KEY, Constants.DEFAULT_RETRIES) + 1;
        if (len <= 0) {
            len = 1;
        }
        // retry loop.
        RpcException le = null; // last exception.
        List<Invoker<T>> invoked = new ArrayList<Invoker<T>>(copyinvokers.size()); // invoked invokers.
        Set<String> providers = new HashSet<String>(len);
        for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
            //Reselect before retry to avoid a change of candidate `invokers`.
            //NOTE: if `invokers` changed, then `invoked` also lose accuracy.
            if (i > 0) {
                checkWhetherDestroyed();
                copyinvokers = list(invocation);
                // check again
                checkInvokers(copyinvokers, invocation);
            }
            // 通过负载均衡算法选择一个Invoker,然后调用
            Invoker<T> invoker = select(loadbalance, invocation, copyinvokers, invoked);
            invoked.add(invoker);
            RpcContext.getContext().setInvokers((List) invoked);
            try {
                Result result = invoker.invoke(invocation);
                if (le != null && logger.isWarnEnabled()) {
                    logger.warn("Although retry the method " + methodName
                            + " in the service " + getInterface().getName()
                            + " was successful by the provider " + invoker.getUrl().getAddress()
                            + ", but there have been failed providers " + providers
                            + " (" + providers.size() + "/" + copyinvokers.size()
                            + ") from the registry " + directory.getUrl().getAddress()
                            + " on the consumer " + NetUtils.getLocalHost()
                            + " using the dubbo version " + Version.getVersion() + ". Last error is: "
                            + le.getMessage(), le);
                }
                return result;
            } catch (RpcException e) {
                if (e.isBiz()) { // biz exception.
                    throw e;
                }
                le = e;
            } catch (Throwable e) {
                le = new RpcException(e.getMessage(), e);
            } finally {
                providers.add(invoker.getUrl().getAddress());
            }
        }
        throw new RpcException(le.getCode(), "Failed to invoke the method "
                + methodName + " in the service " + getInterface().getName()
                + ". Tried " + len + " times of the providers " + providers
                + " (" + providers.size() + "/" + copyinvokers.size()
                + ") from the registry " + directory.getUrl().getAddress()
                + " on the consumer " + NetUtils.getLocalHost() + " using the dubbo version "
                + Version.getVersion() + ". Last error is: "
                + le.getMessage(), le.getCause() != null ? le.getCause() : le);
    }

    protected Invoker<T> select(LoadBalance loadbalance, Invocation invocation, List<Invoker<T>> invokers, List<Invoker<T>> selected) throws RpcException {
        if (invokers == null || invokers.isEmpty()) {
            return null;
        }
        String methodName = invocation == null ? "" : invocation.getMethodName();

        boolean sticky = invokers.get(0).getUrl().getMethodParameter(methodName, Constants.CLUSTER_STICKY_KEY, Constants.DEFAULT_CLUSTER_STICKY);
        {
            //ignore overloaded method
            if (stickyInvoker != null && !invokers.contains(stickyInvoker)) {
                stickyInvoker = null;
            }
            //ignore concurrency problem
            if (sticky && stickyInvoker != null && (selected == null || !selected.contains(stickyInvoker))) {
                if (availablecheck && stickyInvoker.isAvailable()) {
                    return stickyInvoker;
                }
            }
        }
        Invoker<T> invoker = doSelect(loadbalance, invocation, invokers, selected);

        if (sticky) {
            stickyInvoker = invoker;
        }
        return invoker;
    }

    private Invoker<T> doSelect(LoadBalance loadbalance, Invocation invocation, List<Invoker<T>> invokers, List<Invoker<T>> selected) throws RpcException {
        if (invokers == null || invokers.isEmpty())
            return null;
        if (invokers.size() == 1)
            return invokers.get(0);
        Invoker<T> invoker = loadbalance.select(invokers, getUrl(), invocation);

        //If the `invoker` is in the  `selected` or invoker is unavailable && availablecheck is true, reselect.
        if ((selected != null && selected.contains(invoker))
                || (!invoker.isAvailable() && getUrl() != null && availablecheck)) {
            try {
                Invoker<T> rinvoker = reselect(loadbalance, invocation, invokers, selected, availablecheck);
                if (rinvoker != null) {
                    invoker = rinvoker;
                } else {
                    //Check the index of current selected invoker, if it's not the last one, choose the one at index+1.
                    int index = invokers.indexOf(invoker);
                    try {
                        //Avoid collision
                        invoker = index < invokers.size() - 1 ? invokers.get(index + 1) : invokers.get(0);
                    } catch (Exception e) {
                        logger.warn(e.getMessage() + " may because invokers list dynamic change, ignore.", e);
                    }
                }
            } catch (Throwable t) {
                logger.error("cluster reselect fail reason is :" + t.getMessage() + " if can not solve, you can set cluster.availablecheck=false in url", t);
            }
        }
        return invoker;
    }
在这个集群容错的整体架构过程中,dubbo其实也就是三件事
1.在Directory中找出本次集群中的全部invokers
2.在Router中,将上一步的全部invokers挑选出能正常执行的invokers
3.在LoadBalance中,将上一步的能正常的执行invokers中,根据配置的负载均衡策略,挑选出需要执行的invoker
 

猜你喜欢

转载自www.cnblogs.com/laowz/p/10165713.html