Comparison between Hive, Impala, Drill and SparkSQL

Hive

Impala

Drill

SparkSQL

Project Goal

Offline batch processing stuff;

Long running job performing data heavy operation, such as joins on huge data sets

Run real-time queries on top of existing Hadoop warehouse

Provides distributed query capability across multiple big data platform.

Query data from any or all of those data sources at the same time and can push down into the underlying storage system.

Execute SQL query, then deal with the result sets.

Similarity

Impala is designed based on Hive.

Using the same metadata.

All designed for Hadoop env.

Support query data from a variety of different datasources. (RDBMS, NoSQL, File, JSON...)

All support JDBC/ODBC drivers.

 

 

 

 

 

Difference

Suitable for Offline data processing

Focus on online real-time data processing

Not only hadoop project

 

 

 

 

Schema Free: all data is internally represented as either a simple or complex JSON data structure

 

 

 

Fully support SQL Query

(ANSI SQL:2003)

Just have SQL query capabilities

Subset of SQL (SQL-Like)

 

 

Supported by many BI tools

 

 

 

 

Better security support for data accessing

References:

https://www.javacodegeeks.com/2015/12/apache-spark-vs-apache-drill.html

猜你喜欢

转载自blog.csdn.net/yexianyi/article/details/79077752
今日推荐