今天想正式开始编写各底层硬件的驱动程序，首先是双口RAM的，结果吓一一大跳，居然出现如下这么多的问题，这就是传说中的oops消息：
root@WK:mknod -m 600 /dev/dram_driver c 221 1
root@WK:./dram_test
in dram_open!
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c4881fff
pgd = c3e2c000
[c4881fff] *pgd=23c18011, *pte=300010a3, *ppte=30001552
Internal error: Oops: 803 [#1] PREEMPT
Modules linked in: dram_driver [last unloaded: dram_driver]
CPU: 0 Tainted: G W (2.6.26.6 #9)
PC is at dram_open+0x68/0x84 [dram_driver]
LR is at 0x0
pc : [<bf0000dc>] lr : [<00000000>] psr: 60000013
sp : c3e43e20 ip : 00000000 fp : c3e43e2c
r10: c3a98800 r9 : c3e42000 r8 : c3e92280
r7 : 00000000 r6 : c3a74e40 r5 : c3e90d80 r4 : 00000001
r3 : 00002000 r2 : 00000000 r1 : ffffffe0 r0 : c4881fff
Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user
Control: c000717f Table: 23e2c000 DAC: 00000015
Process dram_test (pid: 914, stack limit = 0xc3e42268)
Stack: (0xc3e43e20 to 0xc3e44000)
3e20: c3e43e5c c3e43e30 c0089f9c bf000084 c3e43e6c 00000001 c3e43e5c 00000000
3e40: c3e92280 c3a74e40 c0089dc0 c3d2e980 c3e43e84 c3e43e60 c0084d00 c0089dd0
3e60: c3e92280 c3e43ed8 ffffff9c 00000001 c3dd9000 00000000 c3e43ea4 c3e43e88
3e80: c0084e48 c0084b7c 00000000 c3e43ed8 ffffff9c 00000000 c3e43f64 c3e43ea8
3ea0: c0092850 c0084e20 00000001 c3e43eb8 c002829c c0052698 400d5000 c039bea0
3ec0: becdce9c 00000000 00000004 00000017 00000000 ffffffff c3d2e980 c3a98800
3f60: c0084a68 c0092500 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 000083bc
3f80: 00000005 c0021ca8 c3e43fa4 c3e43f98 c0084b30 c0084a20 00000000 c3e43fa8
3fa0: c0021b00 c0084b1c 00000000 00000000 0000870c 00000000 becdce9c 00000000
3fc0: 00000000 00000000 000083bc 00000005 00000000 00000000 40024000 becdcd44
3fe0: 00000000 becdcd28 000084b0 400d5b0c 60000010 0000870c 00000000 00000000
Backtrace:
[<bf000074>] (dram_open+0x0/0x84 [dram_driver]) from [<c0089f9c>] (chrdev_open+0
x1dc/0x200)
[<c0089dc0>] (chrdev_open+0x0/0x200) from [<c0084d00>] (__dentry_open+0x194/0x2a
4)
r8:c3d2e980 r7:c0089dc0 r6:c3a74e40 r5:c3e92280 r4:00000000
[<c0084b6c>] (__dentry_open+0x0/0x2a4) from [<c0084e48>] (nameidata_to_filp+0x38
/0x50)
[<c0084e10>] (nameidata_to_filp+0x0/0x50) from [<c0092850>] (do_filp_open+0x360/
0x768)
r4:00000000
[<c00924f0>] (do_filp_open+0x0/0x768) from [<c0084a68>] (do_sys_open+0x58/0xe8)
[<c0084a10>] (do_sys_open+0x0/0xe8) from [<c0084b30>] (sys_open+0x24/0x28)
r8:c0021ca8 r7:00000005 r6:000083bc r5:00000000 r4:00000000
[<c0084b0c>] (sys_open+0x0/0x28) from [<c0021b00>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x2c)
Code: e1a03803 e1a03823 e3a02000 e3530a02 (e0c020b1)
---[ end trace 815ab7660b1b7e73 ]---
Segmentation fault
root@WK:
初步分析可能是我在内核中操作双口RAM时没有正确读写！Segmentation fault错误一般是由于内存操作越限造成的，修改过后果然解决了此问题。
附oops介绍（网上搜的，感谢作者）：
Oops Messages
Oops 消息
Most bugs show themselves in NULL pointer dereferences or by the use of other incorrect pointer values. The usual outcome of such bugs is an oops message.
大多数bug通常是因为废弃了一个NULL指针或者使用了错误的指针值。这类bug导致的结果通常是一条oops消息。
Almost any address used by the processor is a virtual address and is mapped to physical addresses through a complex structure of page tables (the exceptions are physical addresses used with the memory management subsystem itself). When an invalid pointer is dereferenced, the paging mechanism fails to map the pointer to a physical address, and the processor signals a page fault to the operating system. If the address is not valid, the kernel is not able to "page in" the missing address; it (usually) generates an oops if this happens while the processor is in supervisor mode.
处理器使用的所有地址几乎都是通过一个复杂的页表结构对物理地址映射而得到的虚拟地址(除了内存管理子系统自己所使用的物理地址)。当一个非法的指针被废弃时，内存分页机制将不能为指针映射一个物理地址，处理器就会向操作系统发出一个页故障信号。如果地址不合法，那么内核将不能在该地址“布页”；；这时如果处理器处于超级用户模式，内核就会生成一条oops消息。
An oops displays the processor status at the time of the fault, including the contents of the CPU registers and other seemingly incomprehensible information. The message is generated by printk statements in the fault handler (arch/*/kernel/traps.c) and is dispatched as described earlier in Section 4.2.1).
一条oops消息能够显示发生故障时处理器的状态，以及CPU寄存器的内容和其他从表面难以理解的信息。该消息是由容错处理中的printk语句产生的(arch/*kernel/traps.c)并按照4.2.1小节中描述的方式进行分派。
Let's look at one such message. Here's what results from dereferencing a NULL pointer on a PC running Version 2.6 of the kernel. The most relevant information here is the instruction pointer (EIP), the address of the faulty instruction.
下面我们来看一条这样的消息。这是通过在一台运行着2.6内核的PC机上废弃一个NULL指针所引起的。其中最有关的信息是指令指针(EIP)，就是故障指令的地址。
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 printing eip: d083a064 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[] Not tainted EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.6) EIP is at faulty_write+0x4/0x10 [faulty] eax: 00000000 ebx: 00000000 ecx: 00000000 edx: 00000000 esi: cf8b2460 edi: cf8b2480 ebp: 00000005 esp: c31c5f74 ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 Process bash (pid: 2086, threadinfo=c31c4000 task=cfa0a6c0) Stack: c0150558 cf8b2460 080e9408 00000005 cf8b2480 00000000 cf8b2460 cf8b2460 fffffff7 080e9408 c31c4000 c0150682 cf8b2460 080e9408 00000005 cf8b2480 00000000 00000001 00000005 c0103f8f 00000001 080e9408 00000005 00000005 Call Trace: [] vfs_write+0xb8/0x130 [] sys_write+0x42/0x70 [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Code: 89 15 00 00 00 00 c3 90 8d 74 26 00 83 ec 0c b8 00 a6 83 d0
This message was generated by writing to a device owned by the faulty module, a module built deliberately to demonstrate failures. The implementation of the write method of faulty.c is trivial:
这条消息是由一个问题模块向其设备执行写操作时引起的，该模块是特意为示范故障而构建的。faulty.c中的write函数很普通：
ssize_t faulty_write (struct file *filp, const char _ _user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *pos)
{
/* make a simple fault by dereferencing a NULL pointer */
*(int *)0 = 0;
return 0;
}
As you can see, what we do here is dereference a NULL pointer. Since 0 is never a valid pointer value, a fault occurs, which the kernel turns into the oops message shown earlier. The calling process is then killed.
如你所见，我们在这里做的就是废弃一个NULL指针。因为0从来都不是一个可用的指针值，所以会引发一个故障，内核会简单地将其转换为oops消息并显示。然后其调用进程会被杀死。
The faulty module has a different fault condition in its read implementation: faulty
该示例模块在其read函数中则有着不同的故障条件：
ssize_t faulty_read(struct file *filp, char _ _user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *pos)
{
int ret;
char stack_buf[4];
/* Let's try a buffer overflow */
memset(stack_buf, 0xff, 20);
if (count > 4)
count = 4;
/* copy 4 bytes to the user */
ret = copy_to_user(buf, stack_buf, count);
if (!ret)
return count;
return ret;
}
This method copies a string into a local variable; unfortunately, the string is longer than the destination array. The resulting buffer overflow causes an oops when the function returns. Since the return instruction brings the instruction pointer to nowhere land, this kind of fault is much harder to trace, and you can get something such as the following:
该函数将一个字符串赋给一个局部变量；不幸的是，字符串的长度超出了目标数组的范围。当函数返回时就会导致缓冲区溢出而引起一条oops消息。由于返回指令会带来指向空地址的指针，因此这类故障更加难以跟踪，你将会看到下面这样的信息：
EIP: 0010:[<00000000>] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffff printing eip: ffffffff Oops: 0000 [#5] SMP CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[] Not tainted EFLAGS: 00010296 (2.6.6) EIP is at 0xffffffff eax: 0000000c ebx: ffffffff ecx: 00000000 edx: bfffda7c esi: cf434f00 edi: ffffffff ebp: 00002000 esp: c27fff78 ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 Process head (pid: 2331, threadinfo=c27fe000 task=c3226150) Stack: ffffffff bfffda70 00002000 cf434f20 00000001 00000286 cf434f00 fffffff7 bfffda70 c27fe000 c0150612 cf434f00 bfffda70 00002000 cf434f20 00000000 00000003 00002000 c0103f8f 00000003 bfffda70 00002000 00002000 bfffda70 Call Trace: [] sys_read+0x42/0x70 [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Code: Bad EIP value.
In this case, we see only part of the call stack (vfs_read and faulty_read are missing), and the kernel complains about a "bad EIP value." That complaint, and the offending address (ffffffff) listed at the beginning are both hints that the kernel stack has been corrupted.
这种情况下，你只能看到部分函数调用的堆栈情况(vfs_read和faulty_read丢失了)，而且内核会为了一个“不可用的EIP值”而抱怨。这种抱怨以及开始部分列出的讨厌地址(ffffffff)都暗示了内核堆栈已经坍塌。
In general, when you are confronted with an oops, the first thing to do is to look at the location where the problem happened, which is usually listed separately from the call stack. In the first oops shown above, the relevant line is:
通常，当你面临一个oops时，首要问题就是查看故障的发生位置，它通常会与函数调用的堆栈信息分开列出。对于上面第一个oops，与此相关的信息是：
EIP is at faulty_write+0x4/0x10 [faulty]
Here we see that we were in the function faulty_write , which is located in the faulty module (which is listed in square brackets). The hex numbers indicate that the instruction pointer was 4 bytes into the function, which appears to be 10 (hex) bytes long. Often that is enough to figure out what the problem is.
这里可以看出我们正位于faulty模块(方括号中的是模块名称)的faulty_write函数中。十六进制的数字指明了该函数中的指令指针长度为4字节，而现在看起来则有10(十六进制)字节长。通常这足以查明问题的所在了。
If you need more information, the call stack shows you how you got to where things fell apart. The stack itself is printed in hex form; with a bit of work, you can often determine the values of local variables and function parameters from the stack listing. Experienced kernel developers can benefit from a certain amount of pattern recognition here; for example, if we look at the stack listing from the faulty_read oops:
如果你需要更多信息，函数调用的堆栈信息将会告诉你怎样找到已崩溃的东西。堆栈信息会以十六进制列出；稍加分析，你就能从中辨别出局部变量以及函数参数。有经验的内核开发者会从中获得很大的帮助；例如，faulty_read函数的堆栈信息如下所示：
Stack: ffffffff bfffda70 00002000 cf434f20 00000001 00000286 cf434f00 fffffff7 bfffda70 c27fe000 c0150612 cf434f00 bfffda70 00002000 cf434f20 00000000 00000003 00002000 c0103f8f 00000003 bfffda70 00002000 00002000 bfffda70
The ffffffff at the top of the stack is part of our string that broke things. On the x86 architecture, by default, the user-space stack starts just below 0xc0000000; thus, the recurring value 0xbfffda70 is probably a user-space stack address; it is, in fact, the address of the buffer passed to the read system call, replicated each time it is passed down the kernel call chain. On the x86 (again, by default), kernel space starts at 0xc0000000, so values above that are almost certainly kernel-space addresses, and so on.
位于堆栈顶部的ffffffff是引发故障的字符串的一部分。在x86体系中，默认用户空间中的堆栈地址是小于0xc00000000的；因此，其中0xbfffda70很有可能是一个用户空间的堆栈地址；实际上它就是传递给read系统调用的缓冲区的地址，它在内核调用链中每次被下传时都会被复制。在x86中(再次说明，缺省的)，内核空间地址起始自0xc00000000，所以可以基本确定凡是大于该值的地址都是属于内核空间的地址。
Finally, when looking at oops listings, always be on the lookout for the "slab poisoning" values discussed at the beginning of this chapter. Thus, for example, if you get a kernel oops where the offending address is 0xa5a5a5a5, you are almost certainly forgetting to initialize dynamic memory somewhere.
最后要注意的一点是，当你查看oops信息时，始终要留意本章开始时讨论的“slab poisoning”的值。因此，如果一条内核oops中出现了讨厌的地址值0xa5a5a5a5，那么你肯定是在什么地方忘记初始化动态分配的内存了。
Please note that you see a symbolic call stack (as shown above) only if your kernel is built with the CONFIG_KALLSYMS option turned on. Otherwise, you see a bare, hexadecimal listing, which is far less useful until you have decoded it in other ways.
请注意要想看到一条可读的调用堆栈信息(如上所示)，你必须要在构建内核时启用CONFIG_KALLSYMS选项。否则你将会看到一个原始的十六进制列表，在你使用其他方法译解它之前它几乎没什么用处。
转载请注明本文地址： Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 的解决办法