Soul 源码分析09 SOUL admin/bootstrap cluster

SOUL admin/bootstrap cluster

模拟soul 网关集群部署, 启动2个admin, 2个bootstrap

如上开启配置可以启动多个实例,也可以打包后通过java -jar启动

在soul-bootstrap的application.yml配置刚才启动的soul-admin的 url

soul:
    sync:
        websocket :
             urls: ws://localhost:9095/websocket,ws://localhost:9096/websocket

启动后分别打开 http://localhost:9095/#/plug/divide, http://localhost:9096/#/plug/divide,可以看到目前都没有数据

启动一个soul-examples-http, 具体可参考前面的文章

$curl 127.0.0.1:9195/http/order/findById\?id=1
{
    
    "id":"1","name":"hello world findById"}%
$curl 127.0.0.1:9196/http/order/findById\?id=1
{
    
    "id":"1","name":"hello world findById"}%

这时候, 我们看到9195, 9196都可以访问代理到,实际上我们只是因为刚启动的配置注册到了admin:9196, 而后被同步到了配置了两个admin的websocket同步的9195和9196 bootstrap, 那么我好奇的是如果这个时候在启动一个example, 修改接口路径, 同步到9096,那么我们bootstrap得到的是合集还是会被覆盖呢, 接下来操作

修改 soul-examples/soul-examples-http/src/main/resources/application.yml

server:
  port: 8189
  address: 0.0.0.0
soul:
  http:
    adminUrl: http://localhost:9096

soul-examples/soul-examples-http/src/main/java/org/dromara/soul/examples/http/controller/HttpTestController.java

将路径改为

@GetMapping("/findById")
@SoulSpringMvcClient(path = "/9016FindById", desc = "Find by id")
public OrderDTO findById(@RequestParam("id") final String id) {
    
    }

启动后做下

可以看到 8188 和 8189 examples-http分别注册到了 9095和9096admin, 接下来测试下

$url 127.0.0.1:9196/http/order/findById\?id=1
{
    
    "id":"1","name":"hello world findById"}%
$curl 127.0.0.1:9195/http/order/findById\?id=1
{
    
    "id":"1","name":"hello world findById"}%
$curl 127.0.0.1:9195/http/order/9016FindById\?id=1
{
    
    "code":-102,"message":"Rule not found!","data":null}%
$curl 127.0.0.1:9196/http/order/9016FindById\?id=1
{
    
    "code":-102,"message":"Rule not found!","data":null}%

可以看到, 我们新启动的8189 examples-http并没有对任意一个bootstrap生效, 可以猜测只有第一个配置的url生效了

而实际上我们看到 soul-sync-data-center/soul-sync-data-websocket/src/main/java/org/dromara/soul/plugin/sync/data/websocket/WebsocketSyncDataService.java

for (String url : urls) {
    
    
            try {
    
    
                clients.add(new SoulWebsocketClient(new URI(url), Objects.requireNonNull(pluginDataSubscriber), metaDataSubscribers, authDataSubscribers));
            } catch (URISyntaxException e) {
    
    
                log.error("websocket url({}) is error", url, e);
            }
        }
        try {
    
    
            for (WebSocketClient client : clients) {
    
    
                boolean success = client.connectBlocking(3000, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
                if (success) {
    
    
                    log.info("websocket connection is successful.....");
                } else {
    
    
                    log.error("websocket connection is error.....");
                }
                executor.scheduleAtFixedRate(() -> {
    
    
                    try {
    
    
                        if (client.isClosed()) {
    
    
                            boolean reconnectSuccess = client.reconnectBlocking();
                            if (reconnectSuccess) {
    
    
                                log.info("websocket reconnect is successful.....");
                            } else {
    
    
                                log.error("websocket reconnection is error.....");
                            }
                        }
                    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
    
    
                        log.error("websocket connect is error :{}", e.getMessage());
                    }
                }, 10, 30, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
            }

明显所有的client都会同步数据, 这里留下一个TODO:看看为什么会产生这种现象