关于view的绘制流程,大家都知道会有onMeasure,onLayout,onDraw。想必也很好奇,为什么view为什么会存在这些绘制周期,到底分发控制的源头在什么地方呢?它又是何方神圣?
1,追溯源头在何地?
(1)特殊activity生命周期onCreate(), onResume()。
先理一理思路,要找到视图分发的源头的话,我们首先要知道我们的视图如何跟activity建立联系。其次,经历了什么过程视图才能真正展现起来?
下面说下这两个方法为什么特殊?我们一般在onCreate中去setContentView将我们主视图给传递给Activity,由此activity就显示其主视图。而onResume是一个视图展示到前台与用户交互的重要关节点,onResume之后才会去正常操作。
(2) 源码剖析setContentView做了什么?
Activity :
public void setContentView(View view, ViewGroup.LayoutParams params) { getWindow().setContentView(view, params); initActionBar(); }
这时候出现window概念,且视图交给window去维护了。那我们可以这样理解,window窗口辅助activity实际管理视图交互,这样activity就能把主要心思放在自己关注的方面。
Window:
public abstract class Window { public abstract void setContentView(View view, ViewGroup.LayoutParams params); }
这是个抽象类,隐藏了具体实现细节,那得找到其真正的实现类了。
Activity:
mWindow = PolicyManager.makeNewWindow(this);
PolicyMananger:
private static final String POLICY_IMPL_CLASS_NAME = "com.android.internal.policy.impl.Policy"; static { // Pull in the actual implementation of the policy at run-time try { Class policyClass = Class.forName(POLICY_IMPL_CLASS_NAME); sPolicy = (IPolicy)policyClass.newInstance(); } catch (ClassNotFoundException ex) { throw new RuntimeException( POLICY_IMPL_CLASS_NAME + " could not be loaded", ex); } catch (InstantiationException ex) { throw new RuntimeException( POLICY_IMPL_CLASS_NAME + " could not be instantiated", ex); } catch (IllegalAccessException ex) { throw new RuntimeException( POLICY_IMPL_CLASS_NAME + " could not be instantiated", ex); } }
public static Window makeNewWindow(Context context) { return sPolicy.makeNewWindow(context); }
Policy:
public Window makeNewWindow(Context context) { return new PhoneWindow(context); }
经过重重阻碍找到了真正的Window实现类 PhoneWindow。
该进入正题了:PhoneWindow.setContentView;
PhoneWindow:
public void setContentView(View view, ViewGroup.LayoutParams params) { if (mContentParent == null) { installDecor(); } else { mContentParent.removeAllViews(); } mContentParent.addView(view, params); final Callback cb = getCallback(); if (cb != null && !isDestroyed()) { cb.onContentChanged(); } }
private void installDecor() { if (mDecor == null) { mDecor = generateDecor(); mDecor.setDescendantFocusability(ViewGroup.FOCUS_AFTER_DESCENDANTS); mDecor.setIsRootNamespace(true); if (!mInvalidatePanelMenuPosted && mInvalidatePanelMenuFeatures != 0) { mDecor.postOnAnimation(mInvalidatePanelMenuRunnable); } } if (mContentParent == null) { mContentParent = generateLayout(mDecor);....
protected DecorView generateDecor() { return new DecorView(getContext(), -1); }
generateLayout(DecorView decor) { View in = mLayoutInflater.inflate(layoutResource, null); decor.addView(in, new ViewGroup.LayoutParams(MATCH_PARENT, MATCH_PARENT)); }
这下我们就知道了实际我们有PhoneWindow窗口管理,而View的层级分别为 DecorView-ContentParent-ContentView
ContentParent会根据我们设置的相关主题等属性找到对应的承载容器。
我们追踪到根视图,及管理窗口PhoneWindow,但是还没有到顶层分发入口。那我们就只能再看看实际视图展现前做了什么?
(3) activity resume做了什么?
涉及到resume调用时机要了解到activtyThread处理activity启动过程了(具体暂不赘述)。
final void handleResumeActivity(IBinder token, boolean clearHide, boolean isForward, boolean reallyResume) { ActivityClientRecord r = performResumeActivity(token, clearHide); ... if (r != null) { final Activity a = r.activity; if (r.window == null && !a.mFinished && willBeVisible) { r.window = r.activity.getWindow(); View decor = r.window.getDecorView(); decor.setVisibility(View.INVISIBLE); ViewManager wm = a.getWindowManager(); WindowManager.LayoutParams l = r.window.getAttributes(); a.mDecor = decor; l.type = WindowManager.LayoutParams.TYPE_BASE_APPLICATION; l.softInputMode |= forwardBit; if (a.mVisibleFromClient) { a.mWindowAdded = true; wm.addView(decor, l); }} }
可以发现,在resume的时候,我们实际的之前创建的decorview才会被加入到窗口管理器中。那我们视图肯定跟窗口管理器有关系了。
现在问题来了WindowManager又是何方神圣?
Activity:(windowMananger设置入口)
mWindow.setWindowManager( (WindowManager)context.getSystemService(Context.WINDOW_SERVICE), mToken, mComponent.flattenToString(), (info.flags & ActivityInfo.FLAG_HARDWARE_ACCELERATED) != 0); if (mParent != null) { mWindow.setContainer(mParent.getWindow()); } mWindowManager = mWindow.getWindowManager();
Window:
public void setWindowManager(WindowManager wm, IBinder appToken, String appName,
boolean hardwareAccelerated) {
mAppToken = appToken;
mAppName = appName;
mHardwareAccelerated = hardwareAccelerated
|| SystemProperties.getBoolean(PROPERTY_HARDWARE_UI, false);
if (wm == null) {
wm = (WindowManager)mContext.getSystemService(Context.WINDOW_SERVICE);
}
mWindowManager = ((WindowManagerImpl)wm).createLocalWindowManager(this);
}
WindowManangerImpl
public WindowManagerImpl createLocalWindowManager(Window parentWindow) { return new WindowManagerImpl(mDisplay, parentWindow); }
private final WindowManagerGlobal mGlobal = WindowManagerGlobal.getInstance(); public void addView(View view, ViewGroup.LayoutParams params) { mGlobal.addView(view, params, mDisplay, mParentWindow); }
我们知道WindowMananger实际实现是WindowManagerImpl,而其内部实际实现类为WindowManagerGlobal.
再看看WindowManagerGlobal:
public void addView(View view, ViewGroup.LayoutParams params, Display display, Window parentWindow) { ViewRootImpl root; View panelParentView = null; root = new ViewRootImpl(view.getContext(), display); view.setLayoutParams(wparams); if (mViews == null) { index = 1; mViews = new View[1]; mRoots = new ViewRootImpl[1]; mParams = new WindowManager.LayoutParams[1]; } else { index = mViews.length + 1; Object[] old = mViews; mViews = new View[index]; System.arraycopy(old, 0, mViews, 0, index-1); old = mRoots; mRoots = new ViewRootImpl[index]; System.arraycopy(old, 0, mRoots, 0, index-1); old = mParams; mParams = new WindowManager.LayoutParams[index]; System.arraycopy(old, 0, mParams, 0, index-1); } index--; mViews[index] = view; mRoots[index] = root; mParams[index] = wparams; } // do this last because it fires off messages to start doing things try { root.setView(view, wparams, panelParentView); } catch (RuntimeException e) { // BadTokenException or InvalidDisplayException, clean up. synchronized (mLock) { final int index = findViewLocked(view, false); if (index >= 0) { removeViewLocked(index, true); } } throw e; }
越发的逼近真相了,我们发现有个ViewRootImpl,字面意思就是“根视图”,没错它就是此次的主角。
public void setView(View view, WindowManager.LayoutParams attrs, View panelParentView) { ... requestLayout(); res = mWindowSession.addToDisplay(mWindow, mSeq, mWindowAttributes, getHostVisibility(), mDisplay.getDisplayId(), mAttachInfo.mContentInsets, mInputChannel); view.assignParent(this); }
好啦,最终viewrootimpl调用requestlayout去实现刷新绘制(我们view中也有requestlayout接口是否很熟悉,最终都会调用到这个入口),同时当前窗口与windowmanagerservice建立联系,统筹管理。
assignParent方法后面再说下用途。
我们来写下关系:
Window(PhoneWindow): 包含DecorView(根视图) - contentParent(contentview实际父容器,由主题决定不同父容器) - contentview(activity所传递)
WindowManager(WindowManagerImpl 窗口管理控制) - WindowManagerGlobal (实际全局控制) - ViewRootImpl
(实际视图分发根入口,窗口加入WindowManangerService管理 )
2,viewrootimpl绘制分发
通常我们都会刷新视图,实际刷新基本都依赖requestlayout和invalidate。以requestlayout为例。
View中:
public void requestLayout() { mPrivateFlags |= PFLAG_FORCE_LAYOUT; mPrivateFlags |= PFLAG_INVALIDATED; if (mParent != null && !mParent.isLayoutRequested()) { mParent.requestLayout(); } }
我们发现会逐级调用父视图,我们一步步跟,发现DecorView中并没有reqeustLayout重载,这就奇怪了,难道跟丢了?
换个思路:mParent在什么地方产生?
产生一:ViewGroup.addViewInner();
private void addViewInner(View child, int index, LayoutParams params, boolean preventRequestLayout) { ... if (preventRequestLayout) { child.assignParent(this); } else { child.mParent = this; } }
产生二 view.assignParent:
void assignParent(ViewParent parent) { if (mParent == null) { mParent = parent; } else if (parent == null) { mParent = null; } else { throw new RuntimeException("view " + this + " being added, but" + " it already has a parent"); } }
带着这两个产生入口去看,我们看看上面viewrootimpl.setView中 有这么一行
view.assignParent(this)
;
好了,就这样我们requestlayout原来最终都会由viewRootImpl负责处理。
越来越接近真相了:
viewRootImpl:
@Override public void requestLayout() { checkThread(); mLayoutRequested = true; scheduleTraversals(); } private void performTraversals() { ... performMeasure(childWidthMeasureSpec, childHeightMeasureSpec); ... performLayout(); ... performDraw(); ... }requestlayout做两件事:(1)校验当前线程是否为主线程 (2)执行Traversals实现视图measure, layout, 和 draw
这下我们就都知道,视图绘制流程分发的根路径了,为什么ui必须要在主线程中调用。