First, I feel satisfied with
1.
The main interface to my overall feeling is: concise, clear functional classification, no bells and whistles. Interface customary.
2.
Individual performance results and curriculum like soon revealed, can give users a quick and timely feedback.
Second, I think local dissatisfied
1.
Scan codes to sign a pretext, feature is not perfect, but I did not find the channel feedback. Violation of the principles to help users troubleshoot software defects
Recommendations to improve as quickly as possible to move side functions, increase user feedback channels
2.
When I try to use unified login authentication even when a 404! ! Several attempts will not work ..... scared, get yourself a unified identity authentication turned out to be such a ......
Violation of the principles of design for all types of users
We recommend appropriate business logic to improve internal service jump
3.
This layout is simply a block to a death sentence for obsessive-compulsive disorder ... interface does not conform to convention
We recommend careful layout ..
to sum up:
Nantong University - teaching general function integrated information service platform to achieve good, but give me the impression that a semi-finished product, I think it lacks many necessary features, such as user feedback channels, mobile terminal and other functions. If a little decoration, complement the corresponding function, I believe, Nantong University - teaching integrated information service platform will become a customer satisfaction and comfortable platform.