Read "competency trap" in a reading APP years - a strong sense a disruptive, forcing I listened to it twice in a row. Several pitfalls mentioned in the book, almost all of them after the condemnation riding in reflecting on. Here recommend to every friend in the workplace, this book should I read the first half of a relatively heavyweight.
Extract some text:
We are very happy to do what we are good at, so they have to do, we will always eventually makes good at those things. Do, the more good, more willing to do more good. Such a loop allows us to gain more experience in this area, but the ability to easily fall into the trap, unable to break through in other ways.
Career-shelter to skills destiny. We are always engaged in their own good things, and that career development, personal interests associated with the transaction will not close automatically to isolate, do not listen do not look do not participate in, followed by the scope of our activities, interpersonal circle, career direction , hobbies and so on, fewer and fewer, smaller, unwittingly caught in the author calls "the ability to trap."
Trap monotonous job skills, interpersonal single trap, trap single occupation, under daily review, I do not know and you have no problem.
At school, learning something fairly comprehensive, basic physics and chemistry History students did not fall, presumably considered a double-digit addition and subtraction must rely on calculators after graduation, not to mention the high mysterious calculus, linear algebra. Job market forcing people to highly specialized, highly skilled professional can only go farther and higher, not knowing that only a few people can, most will encounter a problem, unable to break through the bottleneck. As if caught in the quagmire, unable to extricate themselves. Settle down skills, will undergo a major test, and if a person does not have anti-fragility, it is easy to get on the ground. People development of multi-directional, often the East does not shine bright, not easily reached a dead end.
For example, we once mastered a language that is not experiencing this problem is thinking about language has no corresponding solutions? With a hammer, nails looking everywhere.
都知道程序员圈单身狗多，原因有大致这么几个：工作性质需要常对着电脑、个人性格比较木讷内向、程序媛比较少、爱好比较少(产品、游戏等)、死宅等，有几个命中自己了？其实还有个更重要的原因，是圈子太单调。我们总是喜欢结交我们感兴趣的人，这样一来，同种职业的概率就比较大，不妨数一数，自己身边的朋友有几个不是本职业内的？群体思维是一种限制，阻碍一个人的认知提升，跳出这个圈子会有意想不到的收获，年轻的、年长的、行业上下游的、外行业的，多去接触接触，能更好理解个人的定位，对于未来也会多一份理解。
问题也在于，有多少年轻的朋友发现了这个现象，并去主动采取措施求变呢？
安身立命，仅仅依赖计算机技能，显然远远是不够的，而一个人更需求多方位的。鸡汤总是讲：不给自己设限。老实说，自己的职业本身就是对自己的一种限制。为了在职业发展更进一步，我们花了很多时间精力来提升竞争力，尽量多的学习多种开发语言，尽量多的掌握高深技能，都是在给自己增加底气。（还有一部分同学，并不是对计算机行业很感冒，仅仅是工作需要，职业精进上功夫不足，这一些同学在这一行业是危机很重，但如果能在其它行业开花也是不错的选择。）同时，我们也被限制在这个行业中，你经常可以听到：不做开发，其它什么也不会啊？这个时候就需要多培养几个爱好，顺便看能不能将爱好转变成职业，就是下一步需要提上日常的Plan B。
工作能力，人际交往，单向发展。
如果你很喜欢编程，并且希望可以做到50岁还在一线冲锋陷阵，加油，兄弟！如果可以，不妨走出舒适区，积极的寻找突破口，并不一定非得一个工种、一个职业中框住一辈子，未来还有很多可能，有心的话，多去尝试，人总是会在失败中成长。
To help make learning easy, efficient and free for everyone to share a large number of resources to help you become the front-end engineers, and even the way through the clutter full stack engineers. We are here to recommend a front-end full-stack learning buckle qun: 784783012 unpaid share some senior front-end development engineers recorded video (from zero base to project real case), front-end engineers the necessary knowledge. Also receive free learning resources
when the real start learning inevitably do not know where to start, leading to inefficiencies affect confidence to continue learning.
But the most important thing is I do not know what needs to master key technologies, frequently stepped pit learning, end up wasting a lot of time, it is effective or necessary resources.