The following content is some of the opinions formed by the questions and answers of friends in the past two days, piled up into an article. It seems that there is no connection, but if you taste it carefully, you will feel that they are actually talking about the same thing. As for what it is, I won't say, you can guess for yourself.
（1）
At the beginning of this year, I saw an article: "Yuanqi Forest Bows to Dealers". I just saw another article: "Bianlifeng is in turmoil again: start a new round of layoffs, change the thinking of "store manager's foolish execution""
At the beginning, Xiaomi advertised that it was the first mobile phone for young people and engaged in online direct sales. It was later surpassed by Oppo, which has offline distribution channels.
（2）
Oracle is the best in product side mergers and acquisitions:
Application software acquisition: PeopleSoft HR software and EDS ERP, Siebel CRM software, NetSuite ERP.
System hardware and software mergers and acquisitions: Sun (chips, servers, operating systems, middleware, programming language-language virtual machine technology, MySQL database). In addition, the middleware BEA was acquired. This M&A pattern/courage is too good
Moreover, Oracle's sales side is world-renowned and powerful, known as the four powerful fire pits in Silicon Valley (Dell, Oracle, Salesforce, Cisco, and these companies have a long history of mutual ties and sympathy)
There is production and sales, and a company’s minimum value closed loop is established. It is very difficult to break the golden body.
In the past ten years, NoSQL and data lake warehouses have tried to break the golden body of Oracle. Looking back, they still can’t break the golden body of Oracle’s relational database. This golden hen has always had cash flow, and there is room for maneuver in everything
Old customers - old needs - old products, the world is still led by old guys. The market capacity of new customers for upstarts is not large yet. Therefore, new technologies, new products, and new business models do not overthrow Oracle, but old products, old technologies, old business models, and old customers are enough.
（3）
Before AIGC, researchers at Google made statistics, and 60% of the content on the Internet was duplicated, and people kept copying and copying.
There are two essences behind this phenomenon:
1. There are very few creative people in this world, most of them are mediocre
2. Most moderate people think the same. Just like what we often say: You know all the questions you need to know, but you can’t know all the questions you don’t know
Therefore, the AIGC tool will accelerate the seriousness of this problem.
But it doesn't matter, the public is already producing junk content and is happy to consume junk content, tits, they feel uncomfortable giving them premium content
For professionals, the Internet after AIGC will make them hate the cesspit of the Internet even more. They will move to offline and gather in professional small circles to communicate with each other.
However, AIGC is particularly beneficial to the refined egoists in the middle class of the masses. These refined egoists are not as creative as professionals, but stronger than the general public. They just use AIGC tools to speed up the mass production of garbage content to feed the public.
But refined egoists will not stay for too long, AIGC tools are very efficient, so the tool bonus period they enjoy will be greatly shortened. Therefore, in order to compete for dividends, refined egoists will inevitably step on each other, compete with each other, the lower the competition, the lower they will be, and eventually they will fall into mob groups.
