Analysis analysis

In general, I use three methods to analyze problems, the cross method, the funnel method, and the three-three method. Of course, it does not mean that other methods are not used, but that these three methods are used more and are more skilled. The question is not these three approaches, but whether they have limitations or obstacles.

Naturally, I admit that this habit will inevitably bring some kind of problem, some kind of limitation, some kind of bias. But could there be a way without such a problem? I think the answer is no, there is no comprehensive analysis method that takes care of all demands. The key is that we know where our curves are and where the other side will change, which means we need to know what our weaknesses are and what are our strengths.
Perfection is impossible. The point is to use your own characteristics to solve specific problems and bypass problems you are not good at.

Not extreme, not paranoid, the only means is boring and mediocre. I can't say it's bad, I can only say it's not what I want. Profound and solving specific problems is what I value.