Sky Cloud Paradox






       **Kant believes that human reason has a certain scale, and we can never go beyond our own limitations to fully understand things.

         What we call objectivity is not absolute objectivity, but human objectivity. Although everyone knows things from different angles, the content of knowledge and the process of knowledge of the same thing are repeatable and logical. We all agree that red corresponds to One color, yellow corresponds to another color, these are the human objective


       **Human object is the "humanized world" produced by our interaction with things. For example, color is the process and state of the interaction between the light wave of a certain wavelength reflected by the object and the human eye and consciousness. It is the product of the interaction between the human body system and the natural object system. The beauty of color represents the harmonious result of the interaction between the human body system and the natural system, and is a new material energy system formed by the interaction and combination of the subject and the object. This is the "humanized world": a new material energy world jointly constructed by the interaction and combination of subject and object. --quote


       **Materialism regards the content that embodies the construction of human consciousness as a purely objective existence that does not depend on human consciousness, such as: after the light waves of a certain frequency reflected by the object are reflected in red by The "red" of the "red cup" is regarded as an objective existence, and is regarded as an objective existence that does not depend on human consciousness; another example: the construction of a mass of molecules in random motion is reflected as an entity, reflected as a cup, and Think of this cup as an objective existence that does not depend on human consciousness.

  Materialism cannot cite a "purely objective existence" separate from their consciousness;--quote


       **Dialectical materialism and seeking truth from facts, specific analysis of specific issues, and the dialectical relationship between the universality and particularity of contradictions are consistent; we can analyze the general laws of things contained in a thing, and use this to analyze close to objective facts, but specific to one. The evaluation of a matter requires a very specific and meticulous examination of the details and complexity of all aspects of the matter, sorting out the contradictions (primary contradictions and secondary contradictions), and making judgments that are in line with reality, rather than blindly taking abstract truths (such as morality, justice) Disregarding the actual complexity, directly imposing positive and negative judgments on things. Therefore, dialectical materialism is very "cold", and there are often only factual judgments on an issue, but no value judgments. For example, with regard to the family planning policy, we can analyze its impact on various aspects at the micro and macro levels, and then stop there without making value judgments. If it is time to make a decision, we will further analyze the specific issues, see which aspect of the impact the issue we want to solve is mainly related to, and whether the additional impact of other aspects (from the perspective of balance of interests) is acceptable, and finally make adjustments and decision. --quote


         Vulgar dialectics is the process of telling pros and cons, pros and cons, pros and cons at any time, forcing value judgments, and even distorting factual judgments for the results of value judgments.

       ** Subjective idealism : the epistemology of "subjectivity as the origin" (for example, Xiaoming scored 80 points in the test, Xiaohua scored 100 points, Xiaoming's mother scolded: Look at Xiaohua, the test is better than you, it's all your fault no homework);
        People who hold this epistemological way of thinking first think about problems from the existing concepts and paradigms in their heads, rather than starting from introspective knowledge and analyzing specific problems in real history and practice.
            Objective Idealism : Taking Collective Cognition as the Origin

 **At present, it can be said that there is no absolute truth that is always correct and that covers all things in this world, but only relative truth that is correct in stages and applicable to some things.




Guess you like