1. Description of the plan
1. Test and compare the MOOC and BearingPoint platform
2.
PSP2.1 | PSP stage | Estimated time (minutes) | Actual time (minutes) |
---|---|---|---|
Planning | plan | 30 | 30 |
Estimate | Estimate how long the task will take | 20 | 30 |
Development | develop | 30 | 60 |
Analysis | demand analysis | 30 | 15 |
Design Spec | Generate design documentation | 10 | 5 |
Design Review | Design Review | 10 | 10 |
Coding Standard | code specification | 40 | 10 |
Design | specific design | 20 | 20 |
Coding | specific code | 40 | 30 |
Code Review | code review | 20 | 30 |
Test | test | 50 | 50 |
Reporting | Report | 40 | 30 |
Test Report | testing report | 20 | 20 |
Size Measurement | Computational workload | 20 | 20 |
Postmortem | Summarize | 20 | 20 |
2. Description
】
The red circle is divided into the part I am responsible for. ,
3. Test
The above are the tests corresponding to the two platforms.
4. Conclusion
The tasks assigned to individuals are relatively simple, and the test cases are relatively easy to write, mainly testing the application of various scenarios.
The Xuetang online platform of MOOC is mainly used for online classrooms, while the BearingPoint platform of Huazhong University of Science and Technology was born for the management of university courses. The personal information management of the two has something in common, such as personal information, personal courses, personal grades, etc. However, the MOOC network has more space for personal operation, while the BearingPoint platform has more interaction with teachers and schools.
Fives,
After the group discussion, my personal group contribution is divided into 0.25