Quantitative strategy development, high-quality community, trading ideas sharing and other related content
In the afternoon, I was writing a strategy, and my friend suddenly sent a screenshot and found that he was the top-ranked DISS in the circle. Alas, I'm really speechless. I still have to find time to reply to them. Isn't this a delay in picking up my children from school?
The picture above: I gave you a code, don't say that I smuggle your traffic, it's boring.
At first, I felt that this quant of Song was not us. After all, we didn't name him, so I replied appropriately to take a look.
Yes, they deleted the words of a quant of Song, I'm dizzy, is it really us?
By the time you deleted it, thousands of people had already read it. In fact, it was already defamatory, and I had to talk about it.
You say we are a fake strategy? I will take the earliest SF01 to change this strategy.
This strategy was launched in December 2019. I opened it today and took a look. It cannot be said that there is no retracement, but it still maintains long-term positive expectations.
I haven't changed the parameters and conditions, you can ask me to change this zip file to SF01 and open the workspace for verification. The final version of this strategy is 2015, with unified parameters for all varieties, no future price stealing. Later, we iterated the strategy ourselves, mainly switching to the main link recovery right of the TBquant version.
Which fake policy have you seen with out-of-sample validation for such a long time?
We know that the CTA strategy has a drawdown period, and the market is also divided into large and small years. 2020-2021 is a good year for CTA, really a good year. But from the end of 2021 to the present, it is actually very difficult. Not only us, but also many quantitative private placements are similar, and the drawdown period has overlapped. There is no way, what can I do about it, control the risk, reduce the position, and resist it.
Every major market clearing is laying the foundation for the next round of the market.
The more we talked, the more we went back to being DISS. Squirrel has always pursued the implementation of ideas and strategies, and don't deal with those who are arrogant. We are not doing academics, but transactions! is to survive in this market.
Quantification is a tool, not an end.
I have been following TOP1 for a long time. TOP1 often shares some foreign papers, industry news, recruitment, etc. Frankly speaking, it is quite interesting, although there is no dry goods.
But why do you want to diss us? We have more internal circulation and less publicity. (Busy trading and research every day, so much time for publicity?)
About Squirrel Community
We closed the door, talked about the mountains, chatted about the sky, and from time to time, we made some original content to share with the community, and we made an internal live broadcast salon to share our research experience. It is good to criticize or praise. The community atmosphere has always been harmonious, with many friends from different industries sharing their experiences and stories. Especially the general, the car starts from time to time and takes us off~~~
Again, I said that we are the actual combat faction, and we have publicized the operation status in the third party:
Qihe.com, you can search for quantitative ranking: squirrel quant.
That's right, from November 21 to now, it has not reached a new high. This is a market problem, and it is also improving the strategic direction and position allocation. What we do is not excellent, but you can't say that we are fake, because we are doing it with real swords and guns, and we are surviving in the market.
So TOP1? Show off your muscles please? As the top self-media in the quantitative circle, you must be very good, right?
Show me your capital curve？
Evaluation TOP1:
It's so far away that I can't see its face, the big stick it's waving above the heads of countless fans, and all the QUANTs mocked.
Hold the bull's ear of public opinion, put QUANT in the plaything.
A group of news editors teach others how to study quantification and how to trade? Are you kidding internationally? You're going to end the game to make a gesture. Who gave you the qualifications to sit on the judge's seat and judge others? The ones who are really qualified are the Quants who are silently typing codes and researching strategies to fight in this market.
It's not you, a person who sits and talks about the Tao, who is famous for his reputation.
Finally, I will give you a piece of advice, crack down on fakes, and don't label yourself as "X Zhou X".
Young people, petrol cars can't add diesel.
This is common sense. . .
Oh, by the way, your mailing address has not been sent to me, I want to send a lawyer's letter, please contact us quickly.