Explanation: This article is about Pharaoh offering a reward for the debate [reward discussion (debate)] April Fool's Day should be a scene, once again come up with the folk science fallacy and offer a reward of 1,000 yuan for the hammer! Reply to netizens' questions (questions) in the content of the questions. There are too many bugs in the text editing function of the CSDN Q&A area. So temporarily put the content on the blog and reply to netizens in the form of links.
Hello, welcome to the old debaters of the first battle to return to the second battle! I will first sort out the addresses of the debate between the two of us as follows⬇:
The content of the debate with the teacher "Zhi Zi Zi Cong"
Warm reminder: Since it is a second debate, both of us should be more rigorous, and don't make the mistake of a debate!
Article directory
Netizens ask:
Reply
How to store light? (ps: Was it stored using the force discovered by CERN? Happy April Fools)
How to store?
Logically
The logical form (data structure) of light (scene) I constructed (presumed) in Lao Wang's fallacy, but it is actually very rough. But this extremely simple structure can explain the following "logic" that is currently unexplainable by the mainstream "macromolecular coding theory":
- How simple "memory units" such as a picture, a sound, and a taste are encoded (source information and stored information are both analog continuous signals, without encoding);
- How "connections" are established between memories (eg: Pavlovian conditioning experiments);
- How complex procedural memory (eg: a process a movie) is recorded; etc.
You may want to say: this is your upward build, not as evidence! Answer: Yes! not as evidence. But the problem is that even if it is assumed that the "macromolecular coding theory" is true, it can't logically give me the explanation of the above three questions (note: not only the complete explanation of the three questions together, but one question alone is also very important It is difficult to come up with an explanation), so this passage is only used to reflect the "temporary advantage" of the "Pharaoh's Fallacy" in logic.
Physically speaking
My inference is that "memory space" is a kind of "field-like matter" in the physical sense, and I have no ability to prove it (otherwise I wouldn't have to bother here), but at the same time there is no conclusive evidence to deny it, so I am from the two The rationality of the existence of this inference is analyzed from this perspective:
-
From the perspective of evolution: "Let's talk about macromolecular coding theory and Lao Wang's fallacy from the perspective of evolution"
-
From two famous surgical perspectives: "I did a craniotomy experiment: from the corpus callotomy and prefrontal leukotomy to talk about macromolecular coding theory and the Lao Wang fallacy"
Let's talk about macromolecular coding
Once again, I will give the research results in 2021 of the "Macromolecular Coding Theory" given to me by the highest praised answerer in Zhihu's hot issues some time ago⬇:
《A new theory for how memories are stored in the brain》
The so-called "evidence" of the so-called "macromolecular coding theory" by this high praiser is just the discovery of a potential coding method for a certain macromolecular protein. Personally, I think it is far from the argument that "this protein is the carrier of memory". Far. Very simple reason: even if it is assumed that this protein can store information, then the coding problem, the 3 questions I raised above, and the questions you raised during the war, "How much protein does this have, can it fit in your head", etc. How to explain it? Of course, you can't deny everything because of this one result! But at least it proves: what kind of "macromolecular substance" is still the mainstream "macromolecular coding" is a problem that is hard to explore! It is really necessary to compare the two hypotheses together," said Macromolecular Code. "Actually, I don't even have the qualifications to make a theory, don't you think?
How to filter (by) filter (to retrieve memory)?
If the two hypotheses are compared fairly and without preconceptions, in the previous question, the Pharaoh's fallacy has won out, do you agree? The retrieval method is based on the storage method, whether it is the logical level or the physical level, right? So the following question, the mainstream "macromolecular coding" basically (or even simply) can't answer! My ability is limited and I can't give all the answers, especially the specific logic (mainly refers to the pattern recognition logic) I can't explain, but there is an obvious similarity, which is what I corrected for you after a battle: the "time of memory retrieval" Complexity" , and of course low power consumption, intensity ambiguity, etc., which are also unimaginable by "macromolecular coding". Of course, the problems of physics or chemistry should be left to the interested researchers to explore. Individuals really do not have the ability and experimental conditions.
summary
If you think your expression is clear, you can continue to ask if you have any questions. But please review the question carefully: My question is not to prove who or to deny (this cannot be achieved only through discussion), but to settle for the next best thing, comparing two "hypotheses" which is temporarily more convincing (advantage) .