What are the factors that affect the publication of professional titles? When it comes to evaluating professional titles, many people still choose to publish a paper, because under the same conditions, whether or not a paper is published has almost become a decisive factor. Regarding the publication of title papers, many people do not have enough knowledge about it and often make very common mistakes. So what factors affect the publication of title papers?
First, the journal selected for submission does not meet the requirements
We have a vast land and resources, and different regions have different regional regulations, and the requirements for professional title evaluation are generally different. For the promotion of job titles, the relevant units will make certain requirements for the titles of the papers that need to be published. Although there is no stipulation on which journals must be published, it is said that what kind of job title is evaluated must be in what kind of journal Publish articles, which can greatly increase the probability of the paper being published.
Second, I don’t care about the collection time of the paper.
Many people are relieved just knowing that their papers are published, but they don't care whether their papers are included or not within the specified time of the title evaluation. Before the thesis is written, clarify the evaluation time of the professional title, and make preparations early, generally one year in advance. Under normal circumstances, the publication time of general papers is about 3 months, and the longest ones may take half a year or even a year. In the evaluation of professional titles, some may also require database retrieval. After the paper is published, the database generally needs It can only be included after 2 months, which means that the inclusion time of 2 months must be considered.
Third, the content of the paper
In terms of the writing content of the title essay, it is necessary to ensure the logic, level, objectivity and professionalism of the essay content. The early detection network lists some mistakes that you may make in your writing here. I hope you will draw attention to it in future writing:
1. The logic of the content of the paper
1) The paper is not enough for a large discussion
The author puts forward an argument in the previous article, and discusses it in the following, but this argument is only a phenomenon. The author failed to distill this phenomenon into an argument. It can only be used as a list of phenomena, and this list is only superficial. Not enough as an argument.
2) The text is wrong
The previous article put forward the argument, but when I explained it later, I found that the explanation and the argument were not consistent, and they were talking about two different things, so that, as a whole, the title of the article and the body of the article were misaligned.
2. The level of the content of the paper
A paper with a few thousand words can be seen from the beginning to the end, without any items. It is easy to feel that the level of the paper is not clear enough and very confusing, and there is no desire to read it. Therefore, when the author writes the thesis, he must explain it by item, start with a short explanation, and then explain it by items 1, 2, and 3, so that it looks clear at a glance. The specific format of the article should refer to the "Instructions for Contributions" in the target journal.
3. Objectivity of the content of the paper
This is a very common problem, especially for novice writing. Seven out of ten people make such a mistake, that is, they like to write papers in the first person. For example, "I", "I think", "I think", etc., can use "author", "author thinks".
4. The professionalism of the content of the paper
Professionalism means that the paper must have the characteristics of a certain discipline and profession from the topic, material selection to the expression of words. It is necessary to understand the "quotation" and use "jargon". Generally speaking, a good academic paper is a high degree of unity and combination of originality, scientificity, and professionalism.
Third, the problem of paper checking rate
And the most important point is that after finishing the paper, many people directly submit the paper without checking it again. This is a very taboo point for paper submission. The publication of title papers was originally published as soon as possible, but if the paper is returned for revision due to the high check rate of the paper, it will delay a lot of time, and some magazines will directly brush down the paper, so you must check it again and confirm it. There is no problem in the degree of repetition before submitting.