1. The syntax grammar G [E] is as follows:
–E→E+T | E-T | T
–T→T* F | T/F | F
–F→P^ F | P
–P→(E) | i
- Requirements constructed attribute grammar analysis requirements described semantically
E→E+T {E.place:=newtemp; emit(E.place,':=',E.place'+',T.place)}
E→E-T {E.place:=newtemp; emit(E.place,':=',E.place'-',T.place)}
E → T {E.place:=newtemp; emitting (E.place, '=', T.place)}
T→T* F {T.place:=newtemp; emit(T.place,':=',T.place'*',F.place)}
T→T/F {T.place:=newtemp; emit(T.place,':=',T.place'/',F.place)}
T→F {T.place:=newtemp; emit(T.place, ':=', F.place)}
F→P^ F {F.place:=newtemp; emit(F.place,':=',P.place'^',F.place)}
F→P {F.place:=newtemp; emit(F.place, ':=', P.place)}
P→(E) {P.place:=E.place; }
P→i {if i<>nil then emit(P.place, ':=', i.place) else error}
2. (OPTIONAL) third experiment: Syntax-Semantics translator
Claim:
- To achieve the above expression grammar analysis by operator priority syntax-directed translation process.
- Upon completion of the second experiment (operator priority syntax analysis) on the semantic analysis program design.
- The final output is equivalent to the test Quaternion intermediate code sequence.
Such as
Input: a + b * c, the output
(*,b,c,T1)
(+,a,T1,T2)
Input: b * (c + b) * d, the output
(*,b,c,T1)
(*,b,d,T2)
(+, T1, T2, T3)