Static Routing Lab 2 +2 hosts too router interoperability

Experimental environment
1: GNS3 software
2: PC-two initialization state (using VPCS machine) and two router initialization state
3: If the host using a virtual machine, you need to close all the virtual machine's firewall, otherwise they will be late affect the data transmission.
Experiment
1: GNS3 software, say two PC hosts and two routers ready.
2: We use a network cable to connect it all, personal preference is defined according to each IP address, written next to the port, enter the IP address and facilitate their examination.

3: All the machine running, each IP address is recorded to the PC and router
host IP address set command: ip (space) ip address (blank) card resisted
router IP address commands: into the respective interface mode, enter ip ( space) address (space) IP address (space) Subnet Mask




4: start trying to communicate
all of us to try to complete the IP address of PC1 and PC2 communicate.

Because PC1 and PC2 middle line barrier, then we add is R1 between PC1 and PC2 of a static route to 192.168.30.0 R2.
5: Add a static route R1
command line (in the global mode): ip (space) route (space) network number (space) Subnet Mask (blank) next hop address.





6: We found that PC1 can send a message to PC2, PC2 fed back but not receive?
So we also need to go back and open up the path.
We now need to ensure that data can be received back will add a static route 192.168.10.0 in the route of R2.




Experimental Summary:
If we find that PC1 and PC2 can transmit to each other, to receive feedback. It must be set up static routes R1 and R2 routing needs all set, if it is too much, then routing the workload will be great. This is the disadvantage of static routing :( lack of flexibility).