Article directory
"Silicon Story. AI Writing Master: Learn to write from scratch using ChatGPT"
brief introduction
This book starts from the basic knowledge of writing and ChatGPT, combines the creator's actual writing experience and writing teaching experience, and focuses on the basic skills of writing with ChatGPT, advanced writing methods, writing methods in different styles, and the secrets of writing monetization , allowing readers to systematically understand writing skills and realization ideas. This book includes the following contents: using ChatGPT to reconstruct writing thinking, quickly selecting topics, quickly writing titles, efficiently collecting materials, generating article structure, writing high-quality articles, conducting daily writing training, and using ChatGPT to improve writing monetization capabilities. This book is suitable for readers who want to learn writing from scratch and want to use ChatGPT to improve their writing skills.
Core Essence
1. Cover common writing scenarios: writing novels, writing stories, writing copywriting, writing planning, writing new media articles, writing advertising selling points...
2. Improve writing efficiency: input Effectively ask keywords, generate the required content with one click, and make a complete article with a few modifications, improving writing efficiency hundreds of times.
3. Expand material accumulation: As a naturally large material library, there are only materials you can’t think of, and there are no materials that AI cannot provide. This greatly enriches the material library and makes writing no longer without content. .
4. Quickly refine the text: After writing the manuscript, you have only completed the first step, and revision and proofreading are still the top priority. AI comes with a sentence refinement function, which can comprehensively revise the content, structure, punctuation, etc. of the manuscript, making the revision of the manuscript easier and more precise.
The benefits of using ChatGPT to efficiently complete writing are as follows:
1. Improvement of creative skills: Through continuous writing, writers can continue to hone their writing skills, including description, dialogue, plot construction and other aspects. Over time, writers will continue to improve their writing skills and become more skillful in expressing their thoughts and emotions.
2. Broadening of horizons: Writing is a process of exploring the world and thinking about life. Writers need to conduct extensive reading and research to accumulate knowledge and broaden their horizons. This kind of accumulation and thinking will profoundly affect the writer's creation, allowing him to create richer and deeper works.
3. Cultivation of independent thinking and expression skills: Writing requires writers to have their own unique viewpoints and thinking abilities, and to be able to think about problems independently and express them through words. This ability to think and express independently is crucial for everyone.
4. Improvement of influence and social responsibility: Writers have certain influence and social responsibility. Through writing, writers can convey their own thoughts and values and arouse readers' thinking and resonance. Excellent works created by writers can become part of social culture and have a positive impact on society.
Based on this idea, you can create it based on customer requirements. This saves time in sorting out ideas from scratch, greatly improves writing efficiency, and makes it easier to achieve the goal of making money through writing.
Of course, writing goals are not set in stone. Sometimes we start writing just to talk and heal ourselves, only to later find that we develop a love for writing and want to become writers. It’s perfectly okay for your writing goals to change at different stages. However, no matter what, we need to always be clear about our current writing goals.
Selected book purchase links
"Understanding the Theory of Relativity from Scratch"
The second book recommended: "Understanding the Theory of Relativity from Scratch"
brief introduction
It has been more than a hundred years since the birth of the theory of relativity, but it is still talked about by people. Why is the theory of relativity so attractive? Why did Einstein create the theory of relativity? This book starts from "zero", sticks to the word "relative", places all issues in the historical background, and strives to show the entire process of human exploration of the nature of movement. The content of this book covers geocentric theory, heliocentric theory, relative motion, gravitation, electromagnetic field, ether, relative space and time, Riemannian geometry, special relativity and general relativity, etc.
This book has a rigorous structure and clear thinking. It is written in the form of "one question and one answer", and the questions and answers are interrelated. Comics related to the topic are inserted into each question and answer to make physics science popularization more interesting. In addition to questions and answers, this book inserts relevant physics stories at necessary locations to enrich the content.
key point
1. The comic-style design and time-travel dialogue bring historical figures to life on the page, which is really interesting.
2. Use questions and answers to unfold the picture of human exploration of the truth. The questions and answers before and after are interlocking, making people endless aftertaste.
3. Change the boring explanation and explain it from the perspective of development, making the answer clearer.
4. In addition to the questions and answers, relevant physics stories are also inserted in necessary positions to enrich the content.
book excerpt
Part01 Newton's World
Think, continue to think, waiting for the dawn, and gradually you will see the light. ——Newton
About Me
Hello everyone, I am a physics guy. I like to ask all kinds of strange questions since I was a child. When I grow up, I often answer all kinds of strange questions. . Today, I will take a time machine to go back in time and lead readers to understand how the great sages in history viewed these issues.
01The first station
My first stop was ancient Greece. Here, I will visit two masters of physics and astronomy - Aristotle and Ptolemy.
Question 1
The earth is spherical, what should people do? I mean, of course you don’t have to worry if you’re standing on top, but what about the people on the sides and below? Is it adsorbed on the earth like a gecko?
Aristotle: I can lift the earth easily, do you believe it?
For the Earth, its "downside" always points to the center of the sphere, so every object on the Earth will point downward. Why down? This is because all objects on Earth have gravity, and gravity is always downward. For example, if you throw a small stone upward, it starts to move upward, but due to gravity, it eventually falls to the earth. Gravity is a property of every object. The so-called attributes are innate, just like a person is born with height and weight.
Question 2
The earth is spherical, but the sky cannot be a round cover. What does the sky look like?
Aristotle: It is obvious that the sky is also spherical.
In fact, the sky above our heads has many layers, such as the moon sky, the sun sky, the Venus sky, the Mercury sky, the Mars sky, the Jupiter sky, the Saturn sky, and the star sky - where all the stars are day. In addition to the sidereal sky, there is also the primitive power sky, which is the ultimate source of power for the operation of the universe. All the heavens plus the earth are the entire universe. The earth is at the very center of the universe, so it is called "geocentric theory".
Only the earth is stationary in the universe. The celestial bodies in the sky revolve around the earth every day, so that there is an alternation between day and night. There are some exceptions for the sun. It swings back and forth in the solar sky every year, which causes the angle of direct sunlight to the earth to change, and thus the four seasons change. Although the movements of some celestial bodies are somewhat complex, their daily trajectories are circles and their speeds are uniform, because there is nothing more perfect than a circle and a uniform speed.
Question 3
The earth is the center of the universe, and everything "downward" points to the center of the earth, so a small stone thrown up will fall due to gravity. on the ground. I would like to ask why the sun, moon and stars did not fall to the earth? Don't they have gravity?
Aristotle: I heard that there is a Chinese idiom called "Worrying about the sky in vain", which is very suitable for the question you asked.
The basis of matter is elements, and there are four types of elements - earth, water, air, and fire. Earth is the heaviest, followed by water, followed by air, and fire is the lightest.
Materials composed of earth and water elements will fall due to their strong gravity, while air and fire are relatively light, so the air floats in the air, and fire always points upward.
However, these four elements are only the basis of all things on the earth. In the sky, these four elements no longer exist, but are filled with the fifth element - ether. Celestial bodies are composed of ether and are not affected by gravity, so there is no need to worry about the sun, moon and other celestial bodies falling to the earth.
Geocentric theory
A long time ago, an Indo-European tribe left the Danube River and migrated to the Greek Peninsula and Crete. They merged with the indigenous people and became the ancestors of the Greeks. The ancient Greeks respected nature and believed that all things should be in "moderate mode". If you could go back to ancient Greece and brag in front of them that you are the person who has stood on one leg for the longest time, the ancient Greeks would kick you out with disdain and tell you a truth: No one can stand on one leg better than But a goose.
However, when it comes to natural philosophy, the ancient Greeks’ inquisitiveness has never been “moderate”. For example, when seeing a ship returning from the sea, people standing on the shore always look first When they see the mast of the ship and the hull of the ship, they will guess that the earth may not be a plate, but a ball; when many phenomena confirm that the earth is a ball, they will guess what the universe looks like...
The ancient Greeks realized very early that the earth was a ball. In the 6th century BC, the Milesian philosopher Anaximander (about 610 BC - 545 BC) once said: "The sky continues under our feet." At the same time, the Milesian philosophers believed that The earth is the center of the universe - this is the earliest geocentric theory.
The first person to formulate the geocentric theory was the philosopher Eudoxus (408 BC-355 BC). Eudoxus was one of the greatest astronomers of the ancient Greek era. He studied in Plato's Academy and was a student of Plato. As the "Three Greek Masters" (Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle), Plato's thoughts had a great influence at the time. "The circle is the most beautiful shape" is one of his thoughts.
Eudoxus absorbed Plato’s ideas from the beginning and believed that the planets revolve around the earth-the trajectory is circular and the speed is uniform. Later Eudoxus discovered that the trajectory of the planets was not like this, but he did not revise his theory. There is a saying that he was "saving face" for his teacher Plato. But the physics brother believes that there may be a deeper reason for this: if it is not a circle, you must consider what changes the direction of the celestial body; if it is not uniform, you must consider why the speed of the celestial body changes.
Another student of Plato, Aristotle, inherited the geocentric theory and provided it with a strong theoretical support - the theory of dynamics, that is, the relationship between force and the movement of objects.
Before Aristotle, the famous philosopher Zeno (about 490 BC - 430 BC) once proposed a paradox: To go from point A to point B, a person must first reach To reach point C, the midpoint C of AB must first pass through the midpoint D of AC...if divided infinitely, the midpoint will be infinitely close to point A. In other words, this person cannot leave point A, so Zeno believes that motion does not exist. Maybe you think this is just a statement made by a philosopher, but if you replace a person with an arrow, the absurd logic of "I stand right in front of you, but your arrow can't hit me" will appear.
Aristotle cleverly refuted this view. He believed that "infinity" means "continuity", so an arrow cannot reach the midpoint "infinitely", but will "slip" ” past the midpoint. In other words, motion is like a straight line, and there must be an infinite number of points between any two points.
Aristotle realized that the existence of movement cannot be separated from the subject, so he cannot say "I run like a leopard", but should say "I run like a leopard". So, what causes objects to move? Aristotle believed that there are two reasons: one is from the property of the object itself - gravity; the other is from external force. For example, a car is originally stationary, but can move forward after being pushed by a force.
Movement cannot be separated from time and space. Aristotle believed that time is a number on a number axis. There are infinite numbers between two numbers, so time is also continuous; space is also continuous. For example, a cup filled with water will be empty after the water is poured out. Yet? No, because it's now filled with air. However, the continuity of space will be destroyed by "vacuum", so Aristotle does not believe that vacuum exists. "Nature hates vacuum" is one of his famous sayings. But above the moon and sky, even the air is gone. Aren't they a vacuum? No, there is still a layer of ether permeating the moon sky.
Many of Aristotle’s views are based on feelings and experiences. They have no experimental basis and cannot withstand scrutiny. For example, water will fall due to gravity, but the tide rises for no reason; small stones and feathers fall from the same height at the same time, and the small stone hits the ground first. He simply believed that heavy objects fall quickly and light objects fall slowly; when people push a cart, the cart moves forward. But when the person lets go of his hand, the car will still move a certain distance before stopping. What force is used to maintain this movement?
Among the many hypotheses, the influence of ether on future generations can be said to be huge. In modern physics, ether has long disappeared, but going back about 120 years, finding ether is one of the most important tasks in the entire physics community. In the long history, ether has been a little girl dressed in mystery. Whenever physicists have a need, they will dress it up and push it to the stage.
Question 4
However, the geocentric theory makes me doubtful. Take Mars, for example. It seems not so "obedient". From the perspective of the earth, its trajectory in a certain year is most likely to be "S" shaped. How to explain this?
Ptolemy: Let me explain this question.
As early as the time of Eudoxus, astronomers discovered that the trajectory of celestial bodies was not circular, but almost everyone chose to turn a blind eye. The current needs of navigation require an accurate answer to this question. I propose a solution based on the previous work.
The sun, moon and stars still move in circles around the earth, but the movements of some "disobedient" planets such as Mars and Jupiter are a little more complicated. They do not revolve directly around the Earth, but around an epicycle, the center of which revolves around the Earth - forming a deferent.
However, the celestial bodies rotating around the earth do not rotate at a uniform speed, but at a uniform angular speed. That is to say, at the same moment, the angle of rotation of each celestial body is fixed.
What is physics?
"Excuse me, is the sentence 'All crows in the world are as black' correct or wrong?"
Mathematician: "Until you have found all the crows Before, it could only be a conjecture, like Goldbach's conjecture or the twin prime conjecture; only when it is proved, it is completely correct."
Physicist: "From a large number of Judging from the observation objects, the crow must be black. This is the 'phenomenalism' in physics. If you want to prove that this statement is wrong, you must find a crow that is not black." Ptolemy knew this well, so he emphasized that his geocentric model was not the ultimate theory, but just a summary of experience. If there was a better model, it would be the best. But contrary to expectations, for more than 1,300 years after his death, his "Almagest" has been the textbook of Western astronomy. Later, theological researchers combined geocentric theory with theology, and the theories of Aristotle and Ptolemy were successfully grafted into the theoretical roots of God’s creation of all things. However, what must come must come, and it was Copernicus who believed in God who broke all this. Ptolemy’s geocentric theory fits the first three points well, but runs into trouble on point (4). For the human brain, one epicycle is acceptable, two epicycles can be barely considered, but if there are more than three, the brain will be as chaotic as paste. (4) Mathematics. The theory is only qualitative, and ultimately it must be quantitative, which requires finding a perfect mathematical formula. (3) Theoretical framework. Based on the experience summary, the theoretical system structure is derived. (2) Phenomenological theory. Make empirical summaries of all observable phenomena. (1) Experiment. It refers to all observable phenomena. Is Ptolemy’s geocentric model correct? The answer is also no. The famous physicist Mr. Yang Chenning divides physics into four levels. Whoever wants to prove it wrong must find "a crow that is not black." However, for thousands of years, no one has been able to find "this crow". The reason is that the number of epicycles in Ptolemy's geocentric model is theoretically infinite, that is to say, if one epicycle is not enough, there will be two, if two is not enough, there will be three... until it is completely consistent with the real situation. It can be said that it is consistent with the Fourier transform in mathematics.
From today’s perspective, the geocentric theory is 100% wrong, so what exactly is wrong with it? If we look at it from another perspective, are there any other gentler answers to these mistakes? In fact, every celestial body in the geocentric theory is a "black crow". After being coupled with epicycles and deferents, its trajectory can be completely explained by the theory of epicycles and deferents. From this perspective, Ptolemy’s geocentric theory is not wrong.
at last
If necessary, book purchase link:
-
Dangdang.com link:http://product.dangdang.com/29631093.html
-
JD.com’s link:https://item.jd.com/13864745.html